This introduces template/param and regenerates it in the xmli output. Note
that this does not check that applications reference known params; that's a
later phase.
DEV-13163
The previous commit introduced support for a `.experimental` file to tigger
`xmlo-experimental`. This modifies the error message for unsupported
features to make mention of it to help to the user track down the problem.
DEV-13162
If a source file is paired with a `.experimental` file (for example,
`foo.xml` has a silbing `foo.experimental` file), then it will be
precompiled using `--emit xmlo-experimental` instead of `--emit
xmlo`. Further, the contents of the experimental file may contain
`#`-prefixed comments describing why it exists, as well as additional
options to pass to `tamec`.
For example, if this is an experimental file:
```
--foo
--bar=baz
```
Then the tamec invocation will contain:
tamec [...] --emit xmlo-experimental --foo --bar=baz -o foo.xmli
This allows for package-level conditional compilation with new features so
that I am able to focus on packages that will provide the most meaningful
benefits to our team, whether they be performance or features.
DEV-13162
Now that the feature flag for the parser is a command line option, it is
useful to be able to run it on any package and see what errors arise, to use
as a guide for development with the goal of getting a particular package to
compile.
This converts the TODO panic into a recoverable error so that the parser can
spit out as many errors as it can.
DEV-13162
This provides some initial information to help guide a user to discover how
TAMER works, though either the source code or the generated
documentation. This will improve over time, since all of the high-level
abstractions are still under development.
DEV-13162
This introduces `xmlo-experimental` for `--emit`, allowing the new parser to
be toggled selectively for individual packages. This has a few notable
benefits:
1. We'll be able to conditionally compile packages as they are
supported (TAMER will target specific packages in our system to try to
achieve certain results more quickly);
2. This cleans up the code a bit by removing awkward gated logic, allowing
natural abstractions to form; and
3. Removing the compile-time feature flag ensures that the new features
are always built and tested; there are fewer configuration combinations
to test.
DEV-13162
This flag should have never been sprinkled here; it makes the system much
harder to understand.
But, this is working toward a command-line tamec option to toggle NIR
lowering on/off for various packages.
DEV-13162
This was a significant undertaking, with a few thrown-out approaches. The
documentation describes what approach was taken, but I'd also like to
provide some insight into the approaches that I rejected for various
reasons, or because they simply didn't work.
The problem that this commit tries to solve is encapsulation of error
types.
Prior to the introduction of the lowering pipeline macro
`lower_pipeline!`, all pipelines were written by hand using `Lower` and
specifying the applicable types. This included creating sum types to
accommodate each of the errors so that `Lower` could widen automatically.
The introduction of the `lower_pipeline!` macro resolved the boilerplate and
type complexity concerns for the parsers by allowing the pipeline to be
concisely declared. However, it still accepted an error sum type `ER` for
recoverable errors, which meant that we had to break a level of
encapsulation, peering into the pipeline to know both what parsers were in
play and what their error types were.
These error sum types were also the source of a lot of tedious boilerplate
that made adding new parsers to the pipeline unnecessarily unpleasant;
the purpose of the macro is to make composition both easy and clear, and
error types were undermining it.
Another benefit of sum types per pipeline is that callers need only
aggregate those pipeline types, if they care about them, rather than every
error type used as a component of the pipeline.
So, this commit generates the error types. Doing so was non-trivial.
Associated Types and Lifetimes
------------------------------
Error types are associated with their `ParseState` as
`ParseState::Error`. As described in this commit, TAMER's approach to
errors is that they never contain non-static lifetimes; interning and
copying are used to that effect. And, indeed, no errors in TAMER have
lifetimes.
But, some `ParseState`s may. In this case, `AsgTreeToXirf`:
```
impl<'a> ParseState for AsgTreeToXirf<'a> {
// [...]
type Error = AsgTreeToXirfError;
// [...]
}
```
Even though `AsgTreeToXirfError` does not have a lifetime, the `ParseState`
it is associated with _does_`. So to reference that type, we must use
`<AsgTreeToXirf<'a> as ParseState>::Error`. So if we have a sum type:
```
enum Sum<'a> {
// ^^ oh no! vv
AsgTreeToXirfError(<AsgTreeToXirf<'a> as ParseState>::Error),
}
```
There's no way to elide or make anonymous that lifetime, since it's not
used, at the time of writing. `for<'a>` also cannot be used in this
context.
The solution in this commit is to use a macro (`lower_error_sum`) to rewrite
lifetimes: to `'static`:
```
enum Sum {
AsgTreeToXirfError(<AsgTreeToXirf<'static> as ParseState>::Error),
}
```
The `Error` associated type will resolve to `AsgTreeToXirfError` all the
same either way, since it has no lifetimes of its own, letalone any
referencing trait bounds.
That's not to say that we _couldn't_ support lifetimes as long as they're
attached to context, but we have no need to at the moment, and it adds
significant cognitive overhead. Further, the diagnostic system doesn't deal
in lifetimes, and so would need reworking as well. Not worth it.
An alternative solution to this that was rejected is an explicitly `Error`
type in the macro application:
```
// in the lowering pipeline
|> AsgTreeToXirf<'a> { // lifetime
type Error = AsgTreeToXirfError; // no lifetime
}
```
But this requires peeling back the `ParseState` to see what its error is and
_duplicate_ it here. Silly, and it breaks encapsulation, since the lowering
pipeline is supposed to return its own error type.
Yet another option considered was to standardize a submodule convention
whereby each `ParseState` would have a module exporting `Error`, among other
types. This would decouple it from the parent type. However, we still have
the duplication between that and an associated type. Further, there's no
way to enforce this convention (effectively a module API)---the macro would
just fail in obscure ways, at least with `macro_rules!`. It would have been
an ugly kluge.
Overlapping Error Types
-----------------------
Another concern with generating the sum type, resolved in a previous commit,
was overlapping error types, which prohibited `impl From<E> for ER`
generation.
The problem with that a number of `ParseState`s used `Infallible` as their
`Error` type. This was resolved in a previous commit by creating
Infallible-like newtypes (variantless enums).
This was not the only option. `From` fits naturally into how TAMER handles
sum types, and fits naturally into `Lower`'s `WidenedError`. The
alternative is generating explicit `map_err`s in `lower_pipeline!`. This
would have allowed for overlapping error types because the _caller_ knows
what the correct target variant is in the sum type.
The problem with an explicit `map_err` is that it places more power in
`lower_pipeline!`, which is _supposed_ to be a macro that simply removes
boilerplate; it's not supposed to increase expressiveness. It's also not
fun dealing with complexity in macros; they're much more confusing that
normal code.
With the decided-upon approach (newtypes + `From`), hand-written `Lower`
pipelines are just as expressive---just more verbose---as `lower_pipeline!`,
and handles widening for you. Rust's type system will also handle the
complexity of widening automatically for us without us having to reason
about it in the macro. This is not always desirable, but in this case, I
feel that it is.
This configures the pipeline and returns a closure that can then be provided
with the source and sink.
The next obvious step would be to curry the source and sink.
But I wanted to commit this before I take a different (but equivalent)
approach that makes the pipeline operations more explicit and helps to guide
the user (developer) in developing and composing them. The FP approach is
less boilerplate, but is also more general and provides less
guidance. Given that composition at the topmost levels of the system,
especially with all the types involved, is one of the most confusing aspects
of the system---and one of the most important to get right and make clear,
since it's intended to elucidate the entire system at a high level, and
guide the reader. Well, it does a poor job at that now, but that's the
ultimate goal.
In essence---brutally general abstractions make sense at lower levels, but
the complexity at higher levels benefits from rigid guardrails, even though
it does not necessitate it.
DEV-13162
This cleanup is an interesting one, because I think the present me may
disagree with the past me.
The use of generics here to compose the parser from smaller parsers was due
to how I wrote my object-oriented code in other languages: where a class was
an independently tested unit. I was trying to reproduce the same here,
utilizing generics in the same way that one would use compoisition via
object constructors in other languages.
But it's been a long time since then, and I've come to settle on different
standards in Rust. The components of `XmloReader` really are just
implementation details. As I find myself about to want to modify its
behavior, I don't _want_ to compose `XmloReader` from _different_ parsers;
that may result in an invalid parse. There's one correct way to parse an
xmlo file.
If I want to parse the file differently, then `XmloReader` ought to expose
a way of doing so. This is more rigid, but that rigidity buys us confidence
that the system has been explicitly designed to support those
operations. And that confidence gives us peace of mind knowing that the
system won't compose in ways that we don't intend for it to.
Of course, I _could_ design the system to compose in generic ways. But
that's an over-generalization that I don't think will be helpful; it's not
only a greater cognitive burden, but it's also a lot more work to ensure
that invariants are properly upheld and to design an API that will ensure
that parsing is always correct. It's simply not worth it.
So, this makes `XmloReader` consistent with other parsers now, like
`AirAggregate` and nir::parse (ele_parse). This prepares for a change to
make `XmloReader` configurable to avoid loading fragments from object files,
since that's very wasteful for `tamec`.
DEV-13162
More information will be presented in the commit that follows to generalize
these, but this sets the stage.
The recently-introduced pipeline macro takes care of most of the job of a
declarative pipeline, but it's still leaky, since it requires that the
_caller_ create error sum types. This not only exposes implementation
details and so undermines the goal of making pipelines easy to declare and
compose, but it's also one of the last major components of boilerplate for
the lowering pipeline.
My previous attempts at generating error sum types automatically for
pipelines ran into a problem because of overlapping `impl`s for the various
`<S as ParseState>::Error` types; this resolves that issue via
newtypes. I had considered other approaches, including explicitly
generating code to `map_err` as part of the lowering pipeline, but in the
end this is the easier way to reason about things that also keeps manual
`Lower` pipelines on the same level of expressiveness as the pipeline macro;
I want to restrict its unique capabilities as much as possible to
elimination of boilerplate and nothing more.
DEV-13162
At or around 00492ace01, I modified packages
to output canonical `@name`s, which contains a leading forward
slash. Previously, names omitted that slash. I did not believe that this
caused any problems.
It seems that the XSLT-based `standalones` system utilizes this package name
to derive a supplier name, which is supposed to be the filename of the
package without any path. Since the package name changed from
`suppliers/foo` to `/suppliers/foo`, for example, this was now producing
"suppliers/name" instead of "name".
Of course, it was never a good idea to strip off only the first path
component. But, this is how it has been since TAME was originally created
well over a decade ago.
I did not catch this since I was diff'ing the output of the xmle files, not
the final JS files. I had thought that was sufficient, given what I was
changing, but I was wrong.
DEV-14502
I had never intended to avoid pinning nightly. This is an unfortunate thing
to have to do---require a _specific_ version of a compiler to build your
software; it's madness. But the unstable features utilized by TAMER (as
rationalized in `src/lib.rs`) are still worth the effort.
It's not _actually_ that case that we need a specific version of the
compiler, granted; this is outlined in `rust-toolchain.toml`'s
rationale. You should look there for more information; my approach still
utilizes explicit channels via cargo. Unfortunately, I had hard-coded it
previously, putting me in a bit of a bind an unable to override the behavior
without modifying the software.
The reason for this change is that `adt_const_params` has a BC break
involving the introduction of `ConstParamTy`. This is only the second time
I've been bitten by a nightly BC break; the other was the renaming of
`int_log`'s API, as mentioned in
709291b107. This pinning will in fact
mitigate those future issues---TAMER will be able to resolve the issue at
its leisure, and will further be able to continue to build earlier commits
in the future by simply re-bootstrapping with the committed nightly
version.
If you're curious of my rationale for wanting to inhibit toolchain
downloading during build, or use system libraries, have a look at GNU Guix's
approach to building software safely and reproducibly. In particular,
dependencies are also built from source (rather than downloading binaries
from external sources), and builds take place in network-isolated
containers. The `TAMER_RUST_TOOLCHAIN` configure parameter is meant to
facilitate these situations by giving more flexibility to packagers.
DEV-14476
The code utilizing this is flagged, and so the build would output warnings
saying that it was not used. This resolves that (I've been aware of it for
far too long; I'm developing behind the `wip-asg-derived-xmli` flag where I
don't usually see it).
DEV-13162
This generates some documentation helping to describe the lowering pipeline,
since the function type signature can be daunting to those unfamiliar with
it (and I'm sure to the future me too).
DEV-13162
Like the previous commit's removal of the error type, this eliminates the
explicit source token type since we're able to infer it from the pipeline
definition.
DEV-13162
It does not matter what the error of the source is as long as the caller is
able to deal with it, especially given that the particular error is a
property of the source, which is under control of the caller.
DEV-13162
The macro is off-putting and more complicated than the pipeline definitions
themselves (of course), so this tucks it away so that readers are able to
more easily observe the definitions that they're probably looking for
without feeling compelled to try to understand the macro definition.
DEV-13162
All lowering pipelines are now using `lower_pipeline!`. Finally.
The macro does require some refactoring and documentation, but it's working,
and we now have three pipelines whose definitions are smaller than a single
one was previously. I've been hoping to do this for many months, so it's
nice to finally see this come to fruition.
I had been putting it off, but doing so has made it difficult to compose
other parts of the system, not knowing what abstractions I'll have at my
disposal.
DEV-13162
This makes the sink similar to other pipelines without creating a new
ParseState, and so will allow for integrating into the `lower_pipeline!`
abstraction.
DEV-13162
This has been the ultimate goal for the pipeline for some time---the ability
to declaratively define the lowering pipeline in a way that is clear,
concise, and is correct by definition.
The reason that the lowering pipeline required so much boilerplate was
because of the robust types involved, which ensures that everything in the
pipeline is compatible with one-another---it's not possible to construct a
pipeline that will not work.
Of course, there is nuance involved in some cases---I didn't want to include
the `until` clause, which makes it fail the "obviously correct" criterion,
but that can be improved over time.
This only abstracts away `load_xmlo` and `parse_package_xml`; next I'll have
to evolve the abstraction to support lifetimes for `lower_xmli`'s
`AsgTreeToXirf`. That pipeline also ends with a custom sink that really
ought to become its own parser, but I don't want to jump down that rabbit
hole right now, so we may just support custom sinks for now with the intent
of removing it in the future.
This has been a long time coming. The ultimate goal is that you should be
able to look at the parser pipelines to have a clear, high-level overview of
how everything fits together. I'm not generating documentation yet, but
that'll help serve as a guide as well.
DEV-13162
The report acts as the sink for `load_xmlo` and `parse_package_xml`. At the
moment, the type is `()`, and so there's nothing to report on but the
error. But the idea is to add logging via `AirAggregate::Object`, which is
currently just `()`.
This change therefore is only a refactoring---it changes no functionality
but sets up for future changes.
This also introduces consistency with `lower_xmli` in use of `terminal` for
the final operation.
DEV-13162
Diagnostic events need not be errors. While that was the original intent,
it'd also be nice to be able to use the diagnostic system for any type of
logging, where the verbosity level would determine the type of report that
is output (whether source information should be provided).
Then we could have e.g. AirAggregate produce events describing what actions
are occurring, which could be much more useful than a trace in many
contexts, and would be able to operate via a runtime toggle/filter without
having an adverse effect on performance (since the diagnostic rendering
itself is the hit; the underlying data are cheap).
Anyway---I'm addressing this now to generalize the reporter in the lowering
pipeline, so that it can report on not just errors but anything.
DEV-13162
This formats the pipeline to mirror the style of
`parse_package_xml`. Based on the previous commits, the end goal (though
not necessarily now) will be to derive a concise abstraction for all the
lowering pipelines, which means first factoring them into a common form.
DEV-13162
This makes the API of `load_xmlo` much closer to `parse_package_xml`, both
accepting a reporter and distinguishing between recoverable and
unrecoverable errors.
The linker still does not use a reporter and still fails on the first
error, as before; I wanted to keep this change small.
DEV-13162
This allows us to drop `AirIdent::IdentRef`, which in turn allows dropping
`AirIdent` entirely from `AirPkgAggregate`.
This is also a more appropriate abstraction; having to track all the ways in
which `IdentRef` was used can be confusing. This means that `AirIdent` is
true to its name---used only for identifiers. The new token type makes it
very clear where package imports are recognized, and it's also easier to
search for.
DEV-13162
This is the same idea as the previous two commits: get all the lowering
pipelines into the same place so that we can observe commonalities and
attempt to derive an appropriate abstraction.
`lower_xmli` could have invoked `tree_reconstruction` itself, since it has
all the information that it needs to do so, but the idea is that these will
accept sources from the caller. This also demonstrates that sinks need to
be flexible. In an ideal abstraction, perhaps this would be able to produce
an iterator that accepts the first token type and yields the last, which can
then be directed to a sink, but that's not compatible with how the lowering
operations currently work, which requires a single value to be
returned. But if it did work that way, then they'd be able to compose just
as any other parser.
Maybe for the future.
DEV-13162
The previous commit extracted xmlo loading, because that will be a common
operation between `tamec` and `tameld`. This extracts parsing, which will
only used by `tamec` for now, though components of the pipeline are similar
to xmlo loading.
Not only does it need to be removed from `tamec` and better abstracted, but
the intent now is to get all of these things into one place so that the
patterns are obviated and a better abstraction can be created to remove all
of this boilerplate and type complexity.
Furthermore, xmlo loading needs to use reporting and recovery, so having
`parse_package_xml` here will help show how to make that happen easily. I'm
pleased that it ended up being trivial to extract error reporting from the
lowering pipeline as a simple (mutable) callback. I'm not pleased about
the side-effects, but, this works well for now given how the system works
today.
DEV-13162
I want to clean this up a bit further. The motivation is that we need this
for imports in `tamec`.
Eventually this will be cleaned up to the point where it's declarative and
easy to understand---there's a mess of types involved now and, when
something goes wrong, it can be brutally confusing.
DEV-13162
This extracts and decouples the boundary rules from the stack frames
themselves, which not only clarifies what the rules are (and makes them
match the scope diagrams), but paves the way for future isolation.
DEV-13162
This was used for metavariable declaration before scoping was sorted
out. That was just resolved, and so this is no longer needed (and is indeed
not desirable, since it side-steps the scope index and so will not be found
except by `lookup_local_linear`).
DEV-13162
The ASG had its output reduced previously but I had apparently stashed it; I
found it while trying to clean up after so many failed or partial attempts
and the various scoping changes.
The most fundamental issue is that there's too much information: it's very
difficult to interrogate so I seldom look at it, and it slows down Parser
trace output to the point where it's useless on even one of our smallest
systems, generating 1.5GiB of output for a graph of ~10k
objects (via tameld).
DEV-13162
The scope system works with the AIR stack frames, expecting all parent
environments to be on that stack. Since metavariables were (awkwardly) part
of the template parser, that didn't happen.
This change extracts metavariable parsing (with some remaining TODOs) into
its own parser, so that `AirTplAggregate` will be on the stack; then it's a
simple matter of using the existing `AirAggregateCtx` methods to define a
variable and index its shadow scope, which addresses TODOs in the existing
scope test cases.
This also involved separating the tokens from `AirTpl` into `AirMeta`; they
need to be renamed, which will happen in a following commit, since this is
large enough as it is.
Another change that had to be included here, which I wish I could have just
done separately if it wasn't too much work, was to permit overlapping
identifier shadows. Local variables have to cast a shadow so that we can
figure out if they would in turn shadow an identifier (which would be an
error), but they don't conflict with one-another if they don't have a
shared (visible) scope.
`AirAggregate` can be simplified even further, e.g. to eliminate the
expression stack and just use the ctx stack (which didn't previously exist),
but I need to continue; I'll return to it.
DEV-13162
That was being done automatically before this change, but the change that
I'm about to introduce for metavariables will require this distinction, at
the very least to emphasize the behavior of the indexing.
See the next commit for more information.
(The next commit has a bit too much going on, so I wanted to at least
attempt to separate things where it wasn't much work to do so.)
DEV-13162
The motivating factor here is some out of date or corrupted rustc cache,
however we really ought to be doing fresh builds for TAME; it doesn't add
enough time that it's worth sacrificing assurances.
This finally removes the awkward index from the ASG. This will need much
more documentation and a better organized abstraction, but in the meantime,
previous commit dive into some of the rationale.
In essence: it only really makes sense to have indexing on the ASG itself if
it is used to cache queries or other expensive operations. But that is not
what we were using it for---it was used for caching _lexical_ properties,
which are useful only during parsing for the sake of forming relationships
on the graph. Once those relationships have formed, different types of
indexes will be useful in different lowering, optimization, or querying
contexts.
This formalizes that, and in doing so, ensures that the index is will always
be accurate relative to the content of the ASG. Once the index becomes
separated from it---through the `AirAggregateCtx::finish` operation---then
it is discarded and the ASG exposed.
This is also important because the index is incomplete---it contains only
the information necessary for the parser to carry out its task.
This change was a long time coming, and has reduced ASG to its essence.
DEV-13162
A new AirAggregate parser is utilized for each package import. This
prevents us from moving the index from `Asg` onto `AirAggregateCtx` because
the index would be dropped between each import.
This allows re-using that context and solves for problems that result from
attempting to do so, as explained in the new
`resume_previous_parsing_context` test case.
But, it's now clear that there's a missing abstraction, and that reasoning
about this problem at the topmost level of the compiler/linker in terms of
internal parsing details like "context" is not appropriate. What we're
doing is suspending parsing and resuming it later on for another package,
aggregating into the same destination (ASG + index). An abstraction ought
to be formed in terms of that.
DEV-13162
This was the remaining of my stashed changes that I had mentioned in a
previous commit, but is accomplished differently than I had prototyped. My
initial approach was a bit too klugey: to accept as an argument in various
scope contexts the active parser, as if it were the top stack frame. This
was prototyped before the `AirPkgAggregate` parser was even created.
So we've since created a Pkg parser and now an opaque parser for opaque
idents. There may be other opaque objects in the future.
Because of this change, the parent `AirPkgAggregate` gets stored on the
stack and just naturally becomes part of the lexical scope determination,
and so everything Just Works!
This commit was _supposed_ to be moving the index from `Asg` onto
`AirAggregateCtx`, but I wasn't able to do that because that context is
re-created for each package import currently.
DEV-13162
As evidenced by this change, the tuple syntax was no longer serving us
well. But the real reason for this change is to prepare for the addition of
a fourth field: the index, taken from `Asg`.
DEV-13162
This change means that `asg::air` is now the only module that directly
invokes index-related methods on `Asg`. This clears the way, finally, to
removing the index from `Asg` entirely.
Not only does this result in a less awkward architecture, it also ensures
that lookups are forced to go through the system that understands and
controls lexical scoping, which will be able to give the correct answer.
Of course, the caveat is that the "correct" answer depends on what's
currently on the stack, depending on what type of lookup is being performed,
but those details are still encapsulated within the `asg::air` module and
its tests.
DEV-13162
This is the culmination of a great deal of work over the past few
weeks. Indeed, this change has been prototyped a number of different ways
and has lived in a stash of mine, in one form or another, for a few weeks.
This is not done just yet---I have to finish moving the index out of Asg,
and then clean up a little bit more---but this is a significant
simplification of the system. It was very difficult to reason about prior
approaches, and this finally moves toward doing something that I wasn't sure
if I'd be able to do successfully: formalize scope using AirAggregate's
stack and encapsulate indexing as something that is _supplemental_ to the
graph, rather than an integral component of it.
This _does not yet_ index the AirIdent operation on the package itself
because the active state is not part of the stack; that is one of the
remaining changes I still have stashed. It will be needed shortly for
package imports.
This rationale will have to appear in docs, which I intend to write soon,
but: this means that `Asg` contains _resolved_ data and itself has no
concept of scope. The state of the ASG immediately after parsing _can_ be
used to derive what the scope _must_ be (and indeed that's what
`asg::air::test::scope::derive_scopes_from_asg` does), but once we start
performing optimizations, that will no longer be true in all cases.
This means that lexical scope is a property of parsing, which, well, seems
kind of obvious from its name. But the awkwardness was that, if we consider
scope to be purely a parse-time thing---used only to construct the
relationships on the graph and then be discarded---then how do we query for
information on the graph? We'd have to walk the graph in search of an
identifier, which is slow.
But when do we need to do such a thing? For tests, it doesn't matter if
it's a little bit slow, and the graphs aren't all that large. And for
operations like template expansion and optimizations, if they need access to
a particular index, then we'll be sure to generate or provide the
appropriate one. If we need a central database of identifiers for tooling
in the future, we'll create one then. No general-purpose identifier lookup
_is_ actually needed.
And with that, `Asg::lookup_or_missing` is removed. It has been around
since the beginning of the ASG, when the linker was just a prototype, so
it's the end of TAMER's early era as I was trying to discover exactly what I
wanted the ASG to represent.
DEV-13162
This is in the same spirit as previous commits modifying (or removing)
tests and benchmarks related to accessing the ASG and its indexes directly.
With this change, only `asg::air` uses the indexing and lookup methods on
`Asg`. This will allow me to extract the index from `Asg` entirely and have
`Air` solely responsible for lookup; the graph will be responsible only for,
well, being a graph. Indexing is an optimization strategy.
More information in the commit to follow. But notice how this moving
environment-related concerns away from `Asg` and into AIR, and how the
remaining environment concerns are index-related.
But there is one remaining barrier: to fully move the indexing away from
`Asg`, we have to use an alternative (and complete)
abstraction---AirAggregateCtx with its ability to resolve and introduce
scope based on the stack. The `AirIdent` token subset doesn't yet do that,
and all the work up to this point was in prepartion for doing that. Since
introducing indexing at Root a few commits ago, it's now possible to
proceed.
DEV-13162
These benchmarks were useful as TAMER was in its infancy and I was trying to
gain an intuition for working with Rust. But they are now out of date, and
there are better ways to measure TAMER's performance, including running it
on real-world data (which wasn't possible previously) and through profiling
tools like Valgrind.
With that said, these types of benchmarks _would_ be useful for helping to
dig down into improvements that could be made, at a glance. The problem is,
they aren't testing anything new, and they're also testing something I'm
about to extract from `Asg`. It is not worth the ongoing maintenance cost.
So benchmarks may be reintroduced in the future if they are found to be
valuable.
DEV-13162
The previous commit introduced a duplicate `asg_from_toks`; this just makes
it available publicly for any tests that might utilize AIR to lower the
barrier to writing such tests and provide some guidance in doing so.
DEV-13162
This uses AIR---the ASG's proper public interface now---to construct the
graph for tests, just as all the other modern tests do. This is change
works towards encapsulating index operations (both creation and lookups) so
that the index can be moved off of Asg and into AIR, where it belongs. More
information on that and rationale to come.
DEV-13162
Mike Gerwitz