Some investigation into the disassembly of TAMER's binaries showed that Rust
was not able to conditionalize `expect`-like expressions as I was hoping due
to eager evaluation language semantics in combination with the use of
`format!`.
This solves the problem for the diagnostic system be creating types that
prevent this situation from occurring statically, without the need for a
lint.
This invokes clippy as part of `make check` now, which I had previously
avoided doing (I'll elaborate on that below).
This commit represents the changes needed to resolve all the warnings
presented by clippy. Many changes have been made where I find the lints to
be useful and agreeable, but there are a number of lints, rationalized in
`src/lib.rs`, where I found the lints to be disagreeable. I have provided
rationale, primarily for those wondering why I desire to deviate from the
default lints, though it does feel backward to rationalize why certain lints
ought to be applied (the reverse should be true).
With that said, this did catch some legitimage issues, and it was also
helpful in getting some older code up-to-date with new language additions
that perhaps I used in new code but hadn't gone back and updated old code
for. My goal was to get clippy working without errors so that, in the
future, when others get into TAMER and are still getting used to Rust,
clippy is able to help guide them in the right direction.
One of the reasons I went without clippy for so long (though I admittedly
forgot I wasn't using it for a period of time) was because there were a
number of suggestions that I found disagreeable, and I didn't take the time
to go through them and determine what I wanted to follow. Furthermore, it
was hard to make that judgment when I was new to the language and lacked
the necessary experience to do so.
One thing I would like to comment further on is the use of `format!` with
`expect`, which is also what the diagnostic system convenience methods
do (which clippy does not cover). Because of all the work I've done trying
to understand Rust and looking at disassemblies and seeing what it
optimizes, I falsely assumed that Rust would convert such things into
conditionals in my otherwise-pure code...but apparently that's not the case,
when `format!` is involved.
I noticed that, after making the suggested fix with `get_ident`, Rust
proceeded to then inline it into each call site and then apply further
optimizations. It was also previously invoking the thread lock (for the
interner) unconditionally and invoking the `Display` implementation. That
is not at all what I intended for, despite knowing the eager semantics of
function calls in Rust.
Anyway, possibly more to come on that, I'm just tired of typing and need to
move on. I'll be returning to investigate further diagnostic messages soon.
This introduces a number of abstractions, whose concepts are not fully
documented yet since I want to see how it evolves in practice first.
This introduces the concept of edge ontology (similar to a schema) using the
type system. Even though we are not able to determine what the graph will
look like statically---since that's determined by data fed to us at
runtime---we _can_ ensure that the code _producing_ the graph from those
data will produce a graph that adheres to its ontology.
Because of the typed `ObjectIndex`, we're also able to implement operations
that are specific to the type of object that we're operating on. Though,
since the type is not (yet?) stored on the edge itself, it is possible to
walk the graph without looking at node weights (the `ObjectContainer`) and
therefore avoid panics for invalid type assumptions, which is bad, but I
don't think that'll happen in practice, since we'll want to be resolving
nodes at some point. But I'll addres that more in the future.
Another thing to note is that walking edges is only done in tests right now,
and so there's no filtering or anything; once there are nodes (if there are
nodes) that allow for different outgoing edge types, we'll almost certainly
want filtering as well, rather than panicing. We'll also want to be able to
query for any object type, but filter only to what's permitted by the
ontology.
DEV-13160
Working with the graph can be confusing with all of the layers
involved. This begins to provide a better layer of abstraction that can
encapsulate the concept and enforce invariants.
Since I'm better able to enforce invariants now, this also removes the span
from the diagnostic message, since the invariant is now always enforced with
certainty. I'm not removing the runtime panic, though; we can revisit that
if future profiling shows that it makes a negative impact.
DEV-13160
This addresses the two outstanding `todo!` match arms representing errors in
lowering expressions into the graph. As noted in the comments, these errors
are unlikely to be hit when using TAME in the traditional way, since
e.g. XIR and NIR are going to catch the equivalent problems within their own
contexts (unbalanced tags and a valid expression grammar respectively).
_But_, the IR does need to stand on its own, and I further hope that some
tooling maybe can interact more directly with AIR in the future.
DEV-13160
This introduces a number of concepts together, again to demonstrate that
they were derived.
This introduces support for nested expressions, extending the previous
work. It also supports error recovery for dangling expressions.
The parser states are a mess; there is a lot of duplicate code here that
needs refactoring, but I wanted to commit this first at a known-good state
so that the diff will demonstrate the need for the change that will
follow; the opportunities for abstraction are plainly visible.
The immutable stack introduced here could be generalized, if needed, in the
future.
Another important note is that Rust optimizes away the `memcpy`s for the
stack that was introduced here. The initial Parser Context was introduced
because of `ArrayVec` inhibiting that elision, but Vec never had that
problem. In the future, I may choose to go back and remove ArrayVec, but I
had wanted to keep memory allocation out of the picture as much as possible
to make the disassembly and call graph easier to reason about and to have
confidence that optimizations were being performed as intended.
With that said---it _should_ be eliding in tamec, since we're not doing
anything meaningful yet with the graph. It does also elide in tameld, but
it's possible that Rust recognizes that those code paths are never taken
because tameld does nothing with expressions. So I'll have to monitor this
as I progress and adjust accordingly; it's possible a future commit will
call BS on everything I just said.
Of course, the counter-point to that is that Rust is optimizing them away
anyway, but Vec _does_ still require allocation; I was hoping to keep such
allocation at the fringes. But another counter-point is that it _still_ is
allocated at the fringe, when the context is initialized for the parser as
part of the lowering pipeline. But I didn't know how that would all come
together back then.
...alright, enough rambling.
DEV-13160
I had wanted to implement expression operations in terms of user-defined
functions (where primitives are just marked as intrinsic), and would still
like to, but I need to get this thing working, so I'll just include a note
for now.
Yes, TAMER's formalisms are inspired by APL, if that hasn't been documented
anywhere yet.
DEV-13160
This commit is purposefully coupled with changes that utilize it to
demonstrate that the need for this abstraction has been _derived_, not
forced; TAMER doesn't aim to be functional for the sake of it, since
idiomatic Rust achieves many of its benefits without the formalisms.
But, the formalisms do occasionally help, and this is one such
example. There is other existing code that can be refactored to take
advantage of this style as well.
I do _not_ wish to pull an existing functional dependency into TAMER; I want
to keep these abstractions light, and eliminate them as necessary, as Rust
continues to integrate new features into its core. I also want to be able
to modify the abstractions to suit our particular needs. (This is _not_ a
general recommendation; it's particular to TAMER and to my experience.)
This implementation of `Functor` is one such example. While it is modeled
after Haskell in that it provides `fmap`, the primitive here is instead
`map`, with `fmap` derived from it, since `map` allows for better use of
Rust idioms. Furthermore, it's polymorphic over _trait_ type parameters,
not method, allowing for separate trait impls for different container types,
which can in turn be inferred by Rust and allow for some very concise
mapping; this is particularly important for TAMER because of the disciplined
use of newtypes.
For example, `foo.overwrite(span)` and `foo.overwrite(name)` are both
self-documenting, and better alternatives than, say, `foo.map_span(|_|
span)` and `foo.map_symbol(|_| name)`; the latter are perfectly clear in
what they do, but lack a layer of abstraction, and are verbose. But the
clarity of the _new_ form does rely on either good naming conventions of
arguments, or explicit type annotations using turbofish notation if
necessary.
This will be implemented on core Rust types as appropriate and as
possible. At the time of writing, we do not yet have trait specialization,
and there's too many soundness issues for me to be comfortable enabling it,
so that limits that we can do with something like, say, a generic `Result`,
while also allowing for specialized implementations based on newtypes.
DEV-13160
Really, with a C background, I should have known that `write` may not write
all bytes, and I'm pretty sure I was aware, so I'm not sure how that slipped
my mind for every call. But it's not a great default, and I do feel like
`write_all` should be the deafult behavior, despite the syscall and C
library name.
It shouldn't take clippy to warn about something so significant.
This uses `ObjectIndex` to automatically narrow the type to what is
expected.
Given that `ObjectIndex` is supposed to mean that there must be an object
with that index, perhaps the next step is to remove the `Option` from `get`
as well.
DEV-13160
This makes the system a bit more ergonomic and introduces additional type
safety by associating the narrowed object type with the
`ObjectIndex` (previously `ObjectRef`). Not only does this allow us to
explicitly state the type of object wherever those indices are stored, but
it also allows the API to automatically narrow to that type when operating
on it again without the caller having to worry about it.
DEV-13160
This begins to place expressions on the graph---something that I've been
thinking about for a couple of years now, so it's interesting to finally be
doing it.
This is going to evolve; I want to get some things committed so that it's
clear how I'm moving forward. The ASG makes things a bit awkward for a
number of reasons:
1. I'm dealing with older code where I had a different model of doing
things;
2. It's mutable, rather than the mostly-functional lowering pipeline;
3. We're dealing with an aggregate ever-evolving blob of data (the graph)
rather than a stream of tokens; and
4. We don't have as many type guarantees.
I've shown with the lowering pipeline that I'm able to take a mutable
reference and convert it into something that's both functional and
performant, where I remove it from its container (an `Option`), create a new
version of it, and place it back. Rust is able to optimize away the memcpys
and such and just directly manipulate the underlying value, which is often a
register with all of the inlining.
_But_ this is a different scenario now. The lowering pipeline has a narrow
context. The graph has to keep hitting memory. So we'll see how this
goes. But it's most important to get this working and measure how it
performs; I'm not trying to prematurely optimize. My attempts right now are
for the way that I wish to develop.
Speaking to #4 above, it also sucks that I'm not able to type the
relationships between nodes on the graph. Rather, it's not that I _can't_,
but a project to created a typed graph library is beyond the scope of this
work and would take far too much time. I'll leave that to a personal,
non-work project. Instead, I'm going to have to narrow the type any time
the graph is accessed. And while that sucks, I'm going to do my best to
encapsulate those details to make it as seamless as possible API-wise. The
performance hit of performing the narrowing I'm hoping will be very small
relative to all the business logic going on (a single cache miss is bound to
be far more expensive than many narrowings which are just integer
comparisons and branching)...but we'll see. Introducing branching sucks,
but branch prediction is pretty damn good in modern CPUs.
DEV-13160
This will be used for expression start and end spans to merge into a span
that represents the entirety of the expression; see future commits for its
use.
Though, this has been generalized further than that to ensure that it makes
sense in any use case, to avoid potential pitfalls.
DEV-13160
This adds a line of padding between the last line of a source marking and
the first line of a footer, making it easier to read. This also matches the
behavior of Rust's error message.
This is something I intended to do previously, but didn't have the
time. Not that I do now, but now that we'll be showing some more robust
diagnostics to users, it ought to look decent.
DEV-13430
This moves the special handling of circular dependencies out of
`poc.rs`---and to be clear, everything needs to be moved out of there---and
into the source of the error. The diagnostic system did not exist at the
time.
This is one example of how easy it will be to create robust diagnostics once
we have the spans on the graph. Once the spans resolve to the proper source
locations rather than the `xmlo` file, it'll Just Work.
It is worth noting, though, that this detection and error will ultimately
need to be moved so that it can occur when performing other operation on the
graph during compilation, such as type inference and unification. I don't
expect to go out of my way to detect cycles, though, since the linker will.
DEV-13430
This ASG implementation is a refactored form of original code from the
proof-of-concept linker, which was well before the span and diagnostic
implementations, and well before I knew for certain how I was going to solve
that problem.
This was quite the pain in the ass, but introduces spans to the AIR tokens
and graph so that we always have useful diagnostic information. With that
said, there are some important things to note:
1. Linker spans will originate from the `xmlo` files until we persist
spans to those object files during `tamec`'s compilation. But it's
better than nothing.
2. Some additional refactoring is still needed for consistency, e.g. use
of `SPair`.
3. This is just a preliminary introduction. More refactoring will come as
tamec is continued.
DEV-13041
The previous commit had the ASG implicitly constructed and then
discarded. This will keep it around, which will be necessary not only for
imports, but for passing the ASG off to the next phases of lowering.
DEV-13429
This does not yet yield the produces ASG, but does set up the lowering
pipeline to prepare to produce it. It's also currently a no-op, with
`NirToAsg` just yielding `Incomplete`.
The goal is to begin to move toward vertical slices for TAMER as I start to
return to the previous approach of a handoff with the old compiler. Now
that I've gained clarity from my previous failed approach (which I
documented in previous commits), I feel that this is the best way forward
that will allow me to incrementally introduce more fine-grained performance
improvements, at the cost of some throwaway work as this progresses. But
the cost of delay with these build times is far greater.
DEV-13429
This finalizes the implementation for interpolation. There is some more
cleanup that can be done, but it is now functioning as intended and
providing errors.
Finally. How deeply exhausting all of this has been.
DEV-13156
This just cleans up these tests a bit before I add to them. What we're left
with follows the structure of most other parser tests and is atm a good
balance between boilerplate and clarity in isolation (a fair level of
abstraction).
Could possibly do better by putting the inner objects in a callback so that
the `Close` can be asserted on commonly as well, but that's a bit awkward
with how the assertion is based on the collection; we'd have to keep the
last item from being collected from the iterator. I'd rather not deal with
such restructuring right now and figuring out a decent pattern. Perhaps in
the future.
DEV-13156
This is the culmination of all the recent work---the third attempt at trying
to integrate this. It ended up much cleaner than what was originally going
to be done, but only after gutting portions of the system and changing my
approach to how NIR is parsed (WRT attributes). See prior commits for more
information.
The final step is to fill the error branches with actual errors rather than
`todo!`s.
What a relief.
DEV-13156
This begins to introduce the new, simplified NIR by creating tokens that
serve as the expansion for interpolation. Admittedly, `Text` may change, as
it doesn't really represent `<text>foo</text>`, and I'd rather that node
change as well, though I'll probably want to maintain some sort of BC.
DEV-13156
This removes quite a bit of work, and work that was difficult to reason
about. While I'm disappointed that that hard work is lost (aside from
digging it up in the commit history), I am happy that it was able to be
removed, because the extra complexity and cognitive burden was significant.
This removes more `memcpy`s than the sum state could have hoped to, since
aggregation is no longer necessary. Given that, there is a slight
performacne improvement. The re-introduction of required and duplicate
checks later on should be more efficient than this was, and so this should
be a net win overall in the end.
DEV-13346
This cleans up the old implementation now that it's no longer used (as of
the previous commit) by `ele_parse!`. It also removes the two error
variants that no longer apply: required attributes and duplicate
attributes.
DEV-13346
This handles the bulk of the integration of the new `attr_parse_stream!` as
a replacement for `attr_parse!`, which moves from aggregate attribute
objects to a stream of attribute-derived tokens. Rationale for this change
is in the preceding commit messages.
The first striking change here is how it affects the test cases: nearly all
`Incomplete`s are removed. Note that the parser has an existing
optimization whereby `Incomplete` with lookahead causes immediate recursion
within `Parser`, since those situations are used only for control flow and
to keep recursion out of `ParseState`s.
Next: this removes types from `nir::parse`'s grammar for attributes. The
types will instead be derived from NIR tokens later in the lowering
pipeline. This simplifies NIR considerably, since adding types into the mix
at this point was taking an already really complex lowering phase and making
it ever more difficult to reason about and get everything working together
the way that I needed.
Because of `attr_parse_stream!`, there are no more required attribute
checks. Those will be handled later in the lowering pipeline, if they're
actually needed in context, with possibly one exception: namespace
declarations. Those are really part of the document and they ought to be
handled _earlier_ in the pipeline; I'll do that at some point. It's not
required for compilation; it's just required to maintain compliance with the
XML spec.
We also lose checks for duplicate attributes. This is also something that
ought to be handled at the document level, and so earlier in the pipeline,
since XML cares, not us---if we get a duplicate attribute that results in an
extra NIR token, then the next parser will error out, since it has to check
for those things anyway.
A bunch of cleanup and simplification is still needed; I want to get the
initial integration committed first. It's a shame I'm getting rid of so
much work, but this is the right approach, and results in a much simpler
system.
DEV-13346
This really does need documentation.
With that said, this changes things up a bit: the value is now derived from
an `SPair` rather than an `Attr`, given that the name is redundant. We do
not need the attribute name span, since the philosophy is that we're
stripping the document and it should no longer be important beyond the
current context.
It does call into question errors, but my intent in the future is to be able
to have the lowering pipline augment errors with its current state---since
we're streaming, then an error that is encountered during lowering of an
element will still have the element parser in the state representing the
parsing of that element; so that information does not need to be propagated
down the pipeline, but can be augmented as it bubbles back up.
More on that at some point in the future; not right now.
DEV-13346
As I talked about in the previous commit, this is going to be the
replacement for the aggreagte `attr_parse!`; the next commit will integrate
it into `ele_parse!` so that I can begin to remove the old one.
It is disappointing, since I did put a bit of work into this and I think the
end result was pretty neat, even if was never fully utilized. But, this
simplifies things significantly; no use in maintaining features that serve
no purpose but to confound people.
DEV-13346
Alright, this has been a rather tortured experience. The previous commit
began to state what is going on.
This is reversing a lot of prior work, with the benefit of
hindsight. Little bit of history, for the people who will probably never
read this, but who knows:
As noted at the top of NIR, I've long wanted a very simple set of general
primitives where all desugaring is done by the template system---TAME is a
metalanguage after all. Therefore, I never intended on having any explicit
desugaring operations.
But I didn't have time to augment the template system to support parsing on
attribute strings (nor am I sure if I want to do such a thing), so it became
clear that interpolation would be a pass in the compiler. Which led me to
the idea of a desugaring pass.
That in turn spiraled into representing the status of whether NIR was
desugared, and separating primitives, etc, which lead to a lot of additional
complexity. The idea was to have a Sugared and Plan NIR, and further within
them have symbols that have latent types---if they require interpolation,
then those types would be deferred until after template expansion.
The obvious problem there is that now:
1. NIR has the complexity of various types; and
2. Types were tightly coupled with NIR and how it was defined in terms of
XML destructuring.
The first attempt at this didn't go well: it was clear that the symbol types
would make mapping from Sugared to Plain NIR very complicated. Further,
since NIR had any number of symbols per Sugared NIR token, interpolation was
a pain in the ass.
So that lead to the idea of interpolating at the _attribute_ level. That
seemed to be going well at first, until I realized that the token stream of
the attribute parser does not match that of the element parser, and so that
general solution fell apart. It wouldn't have been great anyway, since then
interpolation was _also_ coupled to the destructuring of the document.
Another goal of mine has been to decouple TAME from XML. Not because I want
to move away from XML (if I did, I'd want S-expressions, not YAML, but I
don't think the team would go for that). This decoupling would allow the
use of a subset of the syntax of TAME in other places, like CSVMs and YAML
test cases, for example, if appropriate.
This approach makes sense: the grammar of TAME isn't XML, it's _embedded
within_ XML. The XML layer has to be stripped to expose it.
And so that's what NIR is now evolving into---the stripped, bare
repsentation of TAME's language. That also has other benefits too down the
line, like a REPL where you can use any number of syntaxes. I intend for
NIR to be stack-based, which I'd find to be intuitive for manipulating and
querying packages, but it could have any number of grammars, including
Prolog-like for expressing Horn clauses and querying with a
Prolog/Datalog-like syntax. But that's for the future...
The next issue is that of attribute types. If we have a better language for
NIR, then the types can be associated with the NIR tokens, rather than
having to associate each symbol with raw type data, which doesn't make a
whole lot of sense. That also allows for AIR to better infer types and
determine what they ought to be, and further makes checking types after
template application natural, since it's not part of NIR at all. It also
means the template system can naturally apply to any sources.
Now, if we take that final step further, and make attributes streaming
instead of aggregating, we're back to a streaming pipeline where all
aggregation takes place on the ASG (which also resolves the memcpy concerns
worked around previously, also further simplifying `ele_parse` again, though
it sucks that I wasted that time). And, without the symbol types getting
in the way, since now NIR has types more fundamentally associated with
tokens, we're able to interpolate on a token stream using simple SPairs,
like I always hoped (and reverted back to in the previous commit).
Oh, and what about that desugaring pass? There's the issue of how to
represent such a thing in the type system---ideally we'd know statically
that desugaring always lowers into a more primitive NIR that reduces the
mapping that needs to be done to AIR. But that adds complexity, as
mentioned above. The alternative is to just use the templat system, as I
originally wanted to, and resolve shortcomings by augmenting the template
system to be able to handle it. That not only keeps NIR and the compiler
much simpler, but exposes more powerful tools to developers via TAME's
metalanguage, if such a thing is appropriate.
Anyway, this creates a system that's far more intuitive, and far
simpler. It does kick the can to AIR, but that's okay, since it's also
better positioned to deal with it.
Everything I wrote above is a thought dump and has not been proof-read, so
good luck! And lets hope this finally works out...it's actually feeling
good this time. The journey was necessary to discover and justify what came
out of it---everything I'm stripping away was like a cocoon, and within it
is a more beautiful and more elegant TAME.
DEV-13346
Also: Revert "tamer: nir::desugar::interp: Token {SPair=>Attr}"
This reverts commit 7fd60d6cdafaedc19642a3f10dfddfa7c7ae8f53.
This reverts commit 12a008c66414c3d628097e503a98c80687e3c088.
This has been quite a tortured experience, trying to figure out how to best
fit desugaring into the existing system. The truth is that it ultimately
failed because I was not sticking with my intuition---I was trying to get
things out quickly by compromising on the design, and in the end, it saved
me nothing.
But I wouldn't say that it was a waste of time---the path was a dead end,
but it was full of experiences.
More to come, but interpolation is back to operating on NIR directly, and I
chose to treat it as a source-to-source mapping and not represent it using
the type system---interpolation can be an optional feature when writing TAME
frontends (the principal one being the XML-based one), and it's up to later
checks to assert that identifiers match a given domain.
I am disappointed by the additional context we lose here, but that can
always be introduced in the future differently, e.g. by maintaining a
dictionary of additional context for spans that can be later referenced for
diagnostic purposes. But let's worry about that in the future; it doesn't
make sense to further complicate IRs for such a thing.
DEV-13346
Converts to use TAME's diagnostic panics, same as previous commits. Also
introduces impl for `Result`, which I apparently hadn't needed yet.
In the future, I hope trait impl specializations will be available to
automatically derive and expose span information in these diagnostic
messages for certain types.
DEV-13156
This changes the input token from a more generic `SPair` to `Attr`, which
reflects the new target integration point in the `attr_parse!`
parser-generator.
This is a compromise---I'd like for it to remain generic and have stitching
deal with all integration concerns, but I have spent far too much time on
this and need to keep moving.
With that said, we do benefit from knowing where this must fit in---it's
easier to reason about in a more concrete way, and we can take advantage of
the extra information rather than being burdened by its presence and
ignoring it. We need to be able to convert back into `XirfToken` (see a
recent commit that discusses that) for `StitchExpansion`, which is why
`Attr` is here. And since it is, we can use it to explain to the user not
just the interpolation specification used to derive params, but also the
attribute it is associated with. This is what TAME (in XSLT) does today,
IIRC (I wrote it, I just forget exactly). It also means that I can name the
parameters after the attribute.
So, that'll be in a following commit; I was disappointed when my prior
approach with `SPair` didn't give me enough information to be able to do
that, since I think it's important that the system be as descriptive as
possible in how it derives information. Of course, traces would reveal how
the parser came about the derivation, but that requires recompilation in a
special tracing mode.
DEV-13156
Of course I would run into integration issues. My foresight is lacking.
The purpose of this is to allow for type narrowing before passing data to a
more specialized ParseState, so that the other ParseState doesn't need to
concern itself with the entire domain of inputs that it doesn't need, and
repeat unnecessary narrowing.
For example, consider XIRF: it has an `Attr` variant, which holds an `Attr`
object. We'll want to desugar that object. It does not make sense to
require that the desugaring process accept `XirfToken` when we've already
narrowed it to an `Attr`---we should accept an Attr.
However, we run into a problem immediately: what happens with tokens that
bubble back up due to lookahead or errors? Those tokens need to be
converted _back_ (widened). Fortunately, widening is a much easier process
than narrowing---we can simply use `From`, as we do today so many other
places.
So, this still keeps the onus of narrowing on the caller, but for now that
seems most appropriate. I suspect Rust would optimize away duplicate
checks, but that still leaves the maintenance concern---the two narrowings
could get out of sync, and that's not acceptable.
Unfortunately, this is just one of the problems with integration...
DEV-13156
My initial plan with expansion was to wrap a `PasteState` in another that
unwraps `Expansion` and converts into a `Dead` state, so that existing
`TransitionResult` stitching methods (`delegate`, specifically) could be
used.
But the desire to use that existing method was primarily because stitching
was a complex operation that was abstracted away _as part of the `delegate`
method_, which made writing new ones verbose and difficult. Thus began the
previous commits to begin to move that responsibility elsewhere so that it
could be more composable.
This continues with that, introducing a new trait that will culminate in the
removal of a wrapping `ParseState` in favor of a stitching method. The old
`StitchableExpansionState` is still used for tests, which demonstrates that
the boilerplate problem still exists despite improvements made here These
will become more generalized in the future as I have time (and the
functional aspects of the code more formalized too, now that they're taking
shape).
The benefit of this is that we avoid having to warp our abstractions in ways
that don't make sense (use of a dead state transition) just to satisfy
existing APIs. It also means that we do not need the boilerplate of a
`ParseState` any time we want to introduce this type of
stitching/delegation. It also means that those methods can eventually be
extracted into more general traits in the future as well.
Ultimately, though, the two would have accomplished the same thing. But the
difference is most emphasized in the _parent_---the actual stitching still
has to take place for desugaring in the attribute parser, and I'd like for
that abstraction to still be in terms of expansion. But if I utilized
`StitchableExpansionState`, which converted into a dead state, I'd have to
either forego the expansion abstraction---which would make the parser even
more confusing---or I'd have to create _another_ abstraction around the dead
state, which would mean that I stripped one abstraction just to introduce
another one that's essentially the same thing. It didn't feel right, but it
would have worked.
The use of `PhantomData` in `StitchableExpansionState` was also a sign that
something wasn't quite right, in terms of how the abstractions were
integrating with one-another.
And so here we are, as I struggle to wade my way through all of the yak
shavings and make any meaningful progress on this project, while others
continue to suffer due to slow build times.
I'm sorry. Even if the system is improving.
DEV-13156
This is just intended to simplify the job of panicing when something is
expected to be `None`. In my case, `Lookahead`; see upcoming commits.
This is intended to be generalized to more than just `Option`, but I have no
use for it elsewhere yet; I primarily just needed to implement a method on
`Option` so that I could have the ergonomics of the dot notation.
DEV-13156
There's no use in duplicating this in util::expand.
Lookahead tokens are one of the few invariants that I haven't taken the time
of enforcing using the type system, because it'd be quite a bit of work that
I do not have time for, and may not be worth it with changes that may make
the system less ergonomic. Nonetheless, I do hope to address it at some
point in the (possibly-far) future.
If ever you encounter this diagnostic message, ask yourself how stable TAMER
otherwise is and how many other issues like this have been entirely
prevented through compile-time proofs using the type system.
DEV-13156
As in previous commits, this continues to replace panics with
`diagnostic_panic!`, which provides much more useful information both for
debugging and to help the user possibly work around the problem. And lets
the user know that it's not their fault, and it's a TAMER bug that should be
reported.
...am I going to rationalize it in each commit message?
DEV-13156
This moves enough of the handling of complex type conversions into the
various components of `TransitionResult` (and itself), which simplifies
delegation and opens up the possibility of having specialized
delegation/stitching methods implemented atop of `TransitionResult`.
DEV-13156
These delegation methods have been a pain in my ass for quite some time, and
their lack of generalization makes the introduction of new delegation
methods (in the general sense, not necessarily trait methods) very tedious
and prone to inconsistencies.
I'm going to progressively refactor them in separate commits so it's clear
what I'm doing, primarily for future me to reference if need be.
DEV-13156
This beings to introduce more primitive operations to `TransitionResult` and
its components so that I can actually work with them without having to write
a bunch of concrete, boilerplate implementations. This is demonstrated in
part by `EchoState` (which is nearly all boilerplate, but whose correctness
should be verifiable at a glance), which will be used going forward as a
basis for default implementations for parsers (e.g. expansion delegation).
DEV-13156
This has evolved into a more robust and independent concept, but it is still
a utility in the sense that it's utilizing existing parsing framework
features and making them more convenient.
DEV-13156
These traits serve to abstract away some of the type-level details and
clearly state what the end result is (something stitchable with a parent).
I'm admittedly battling myself on this concept a bit. The proper layer of
abstraction is the concept of expansion, which is an abstraction that is
likely to be maintained all the way through, but we strip the abstraction
for the sake of delegation. Maybe the better option is to provide a
different method of delegation and avoid the stripping at all, and avoid the
awkward interaction with the dead state.
The awkwardness comes from the fact that delegating right now is so rigid
and defined in terms of a method on state rather than a mapping between
`TransitionResult`s. But I really need to move on... ;_;
The original design was trying to generalize this such that composition at
the attribute parser level (for NIR) would be able to just accept any
sitchable parser with the convention that the dead state is the replacement
token. But that is the wrong layer of abstraction, which not only makes it
confusing, but is asking for trouble when someone inevitably violates that
contract.
With all of that said, `StitchableExpansionState` _is_ a delegation. It
could just as easily be a function (`is_accepting` always delegates too), so
perhaps that should just be generalized as reifying delegation as a
`ParseState`.
DEV-13156
This parser really just allows me to continue developing the NIR
interpolation system using `Expansion` terminology, and avoid having to use
dead states in tests. This allows for the appropriate level of abstraction
to be used in isolation, and then only be stripped when stitching is
necessary.
Future commits will show how this is actually integrated and may introduce
additional abstraction to help.
DEV-13156
This is a shift in approach.
My original idea was to try to keep NIR parsing the way it was, since it's
already hard enough to reason about with the `ele_parse!` parser-generator
macro mess. The idea was to produce an IR that would explicitly be denoted
as "maybe sugared", and have a desugaring operation as part of the lowering
pipeline that would perform interpolation and lower the symbol into a plain
version.
The problem with that is:
1. The use of the type was going to introduce a lot of mapping for all the
NIR token variants there are going to be; and
2. _The types weren't even utilized for interpolation._
Instead, if we interpolated _as attributes are encountered_ while parsing
NIR, then we'd be able to expand directly into that NIR token stream and
handle _all_ symbols in a generic way, without any mapping beyond the
definition of NIR's grammar using `ele_parse!`.
This is a step in that direction---it removes `NirSymbolTy` and introduces a
generic abstraction for the concept of expansion, which will be utilized
soon by the attribute parser to allow replacing `TryFrom` with something
akin to `ParseFrom`, or something like that, which is able to produce a
token stream before finally yielding the value of the attribute (which will
be either the original symbol or the replacement metavariable, in the case
of interpolation).
(Note that interpolation isn't yet finished---errors still need to be
implemented. But I want a working vertical slice first.)
DEV-13156
This was a substantial change. Design and rationale are documented on
`AttrFieldSum` and related as part of this change, so please review the diff
for more information there.
If you're a Ryan employee, DEV-13209 gives plenty of profiling information,
including raw data and visualizations from kcachegrind. For everyone else:
you're able to easy produce your own from this commit and the previous and
comparing the `__memcpy_avk_unaligned_erms` calls. The reduction is
significant in this commit (~90%), and the number of Parsers invoking it has
been reduced. Rust has been able to optimize more aggressively, and
compound some of those optimizations, with the smaller `NirParseState`
width.
It also worth noting that `malloc` calls do not change at all between
these two changes, so when we refer to memory, we're referring to
pre-allocated memory on the stack, as TAMER was designed to utilize.
DEV-13209
This is a diagnostic replacement for `unreachable!`.
Eventually TAMER'll have build-time checks to enforce the use of these over
alternatives; I need to survey the old instances on a case-by-case basis to
see what diagnostic information can be reasonably presented in that context.
DEV-13209
The spans were previously not being calculated relative to the offset of the
original symbol span. Tests were passing because all of those spans began
at offset 0.
DEV-13156
This demonstrates how desugaring of interpolated strings will work, testing
one of the happy paths. The remaining work to be done is largely
refactoring; handling some other cases; and errors. Each of those items are
marked with `todo!`s.
I'm pleased with how this is turning out, and I'm excited to see diagnostic
reporting within the specification string using the derived spans once I get
a bit further along; this robust system is going to be much more helpful to
developers than the existing system in XSLT.
This also eliminates the ~50% performance degredation mentioned in a recent
commit by eliminating the SugaredNirSymbol enum and replacing it with a
newtype; this is a much better approach, though it doesn't change that I do
need to eventually address the excessive `memcpy`s on hot code paths.
DEV-13156
Not sure why I didn't add a prelude sooner, considering all the import
boilerplate. This will evolve as needed and I'll go back and replace other
imports when I'm not in the middle of something.
DEV-13156
Add initial descriptions and consolodate some of the types. There'll be
more to come; this is just to get `Display` derives working for types
that'll be using it. I'd like to see where this description manifests
itself before I decide how user-friendly I'd like it to be.
DEV-13156
This mirror is only a `Todo` variant at the moment, but my hope had been to
try to creatively nest or use generics to simplify the conversaion between
the two flavors without a lot of boilerplate. But it doesn't seem like I'm
going to be successful, and may have to resort to macros to remove
boilerplate.
But I need to stop fighting with myself and move on. Though I would still
like to keep the types purely compile-time via const generics if possible,
since they're not needed in memory (or disk) until we get to templates;
they're otherwise static relative to a NIR token variant.
DEV-13209
This simply detects whether a value will need to be further parsed for
interpolation; it does not yet perform the parsing itself, which will happen
during desugaring.
This introduces a performance regression, for an interesting reason. I
found that introducing a single new variant to `SugaredNir` (with a
`(SymbolId, Span)` pair), was causing the width of the `NirParseState` type
to increase just enough to cause Rust to be unable to optimize away a
significant number of memcpys related to `Parser` moves, and consequently
reducing performance by nearly 50% for `tamec`. Yikes.
I suspected this would be a problem, and indeed have tried in all other
cases to avoid aggregation until the ASG---the problem is that I had wanted
to aggregate attributes for NIR so that the IR could actually make some
progress toward simplifying the stream (and therefore working with the
data), and be able to validate against a grammar defined in a single
place. The problem is that the `NirParseState` type contains a sum type for
every attribute parser, and is therefore as wide as the largest one. That
is what Rust is having trouble optimizing memcpy away for.
Indeed, reducing the number of attributes improves the situation
drastically. However, it doesn't make it go away entirely.
If you look at a callgrind profile for `tameld` (or a dissassembly), you'll
notice that I put quite a bit of effort into ensuring that the hot code path
for the lowering pipeline contains _no_ memcpys for the parsers. But that
is not the case with `tamec`---I had to move on. But I do still have the
same escape hatch that I introduced for `tameld`, which is the mutable
`Context`.
It seems that may be the solution there too, but I want to get a bit further
along first to see how these data end up propagating before I go through
that somewhat significant effort.
DEV-13156
Various parts of the system have to be converted to use `diagnostic_panic!`,
which makes it very clear that this is a bug in TAMER that should be
reported. I just happened to see this one near code I was about to touch.
DEV-13156
This introduces the concept of sugared NIR and provides the boilerplate for
a desugaring pass. The earlier commits dealing with cleaning up the
lowering pipeline were to support this work, in particular to ensure that
reporting and recovery properly applied to this lowering operation without
adding a ton more boilerplate.
DEV-13158
I'm struggling to go much further yet without sorting out some other things
first with regards to mutable `Context` and, in particular, the ASG.
I'm going to pause on refactoring the lowering pipeline---it's been improved
significantly with the recent work---and I will continue in the next few
weeks.
DEV-13158
Lowering errors in tamec end up utilizing recovery and reporting, so there
is a distinction between recoverable and unrecoverable errors.
tameld aborts on the first error, since recovery is not currently
supported (we'll want to add it, since tameld should output e.g. lists of
unresolved externs).
Note that tamec does not yet handle `FinalizeError` like tameld because it
uses `Lower::lower`, which does not yet finalize (though it does in practice
when it reaches the end of the stream and auto-finalizes, but that is
widened into a `ParseError`).
DEV-13158
This helps to clarify the situations under which these errors can occur, and
the generality also helps to show why the inner types are as they
are (e.g. use of `String`).
But more importantly, this allows for an error type in `finalize` that is
detached from the `ParseState`, which will be able to be utilized in the
lowering pipeline as a more general error distinguishable from other
lowering errors. At the moment I'm maintaining BC, but a following commit
will demonstrate the use case to introduce recoverable vs. non-recoverable
errors.
DEV-13158
This newtype allows a caller to prove (using types) that a parser of a given
type (`ParseState`) has been finalized.
This will be used by the lowering pipeline to ensure that all parsers in the
pipeline end up getting finalized (as you can see from a TODO added in the
code, one of them is missing). The lack of such a type was an oversight
during the (rather stressed) development of the parsing system, and I
shouldn't need to resort to unit tests to verify that parsers have been
finalized.
DEV-13158
This reverts commit 85ec626fcd804eb2fac3fd6f0339182554f72cfd.
This revert had to be modified to work alongside other changes. Interior
mutability is fortunately no longer needed after the previous commit which
allows reporting to occur in a single place in the lowering pipeline (at the
terminal parser).
DEV-13158
The term "terminal parser" isn't formalized yet in the system, but is meant
to refer to the innermost parser that is responsible for pulling tokens
through the lowering pipeline.
This approach is more of what one would expect when dealing with
`Result`-like monads---we are effectively chaining the inner operation while
propagating errors to short-circuit lowering and let the caller decide
whether recovery ought to be permitted with diagnostic messages. This will
become more clear as it is further refactored.
This also means that the previous changes for introducing interior
mutability for a shared mutable `Reporter` can be reverted, which is great,
since that approach was antithetical to how the streaming pipeline
operates (and introduces awkward mutable state into an
otherwise-mostly-immutable system).
DEV-13158
This extracts error tracking into the Reporter itself, which is already
shared between lowering operations. This can then be used to display the
number of errors.
A new formatter (in tamer::fmt) will be added to handle the singular/plural
conversion in place of "error(s)" in the future; I have more important
things to work on right now.
DEV-13158
Previously these errors would immediately abort.
This results in some duplicate code, but it's beginning to derive a common
implementation. Check out the commits that follow; this is really an
intermediate refactoring state.
DEV-13158
Another baby step. The small commits are intended to allow comprehension of
what changes when looking at the diffs.
This also removes a comment stating that errors do not fail compilation,
since they most certainly do.
DEV-13158
This begins refactoring the lowering pipeline to begin to obviate
abstraction boundaries. The lowering pipeline is the backbone of the
system, and so it needs to become clear and self-documenting, which will
take a little bit of work.
DEV-13158
Just preparing to actually define NIR itself. The _grammar_ has been
represented (derived from our internal systems, using them as a test case),
but the IR itself has not yet received a definition.
DEV-7145
This is a quick-and-dirty change. The lowering pipeline needs a proper
abstraction, but I'm about to be on vacation at the end of the week and
would like to get NIR->AIR lowering started before I consider that
abstraction further, so this will do for now.
NIR parsing has been tested in production without failing for over a week.
DEV-7145
This was originally the "noramlized" IR, but that's not possible to do
without template expansion, which is going to happen at a later point. So,
this is just "NIR", pronounced "near", which is an IR that is "near" to the
source code. You can define it was "Near IR" if you want, but it's just a
homonym with a not-quite-defined acronym to me.
DEV-7145
A type alias was added for BC before errors were hoisted out in a previous
commit, but they are unnecessary because of the associated type on
`ParseState`.
This also corrects the long-existing issue of using generated identifiers in
tests.
DEV-7145
This moves `paste::paste!` up a line and reduces a level of indentation,
since it's so squished. Aside from docblock reformatting, there are no
other changes.
DEV-7145
This slims out the macro even further. It does result in an
awkwardly-placed `PhantomData` because I don't want to add another variant
that isn't actually used (since they represent states).
DEV-7145
This is in preparation for hoisting out the common states, as was done with
the Sum NT in a previous commit.
I also think that organizing states in this way is more clear. The previous
embedding of the variants named after the NTs themselves was because the
parser was storing the child state within it, before the introduction of the
superstate trampoline.
DEV-7145
Everything except for one state was already accounted for. We can now have
confidence that the parser will never panic due to state transitions (beyond
legitimate error conditions).
There are some `unreachable!`s to contend with still.
DEV-7145
This is the same as the previous commits, but for non-sum NTs.
This also extracts errors into a separate module, which I had hoped to do in
a separate commit, but it's not worth separating them. My _original_ reason
for doing so was debugging (I'll get into that below), but I had wanted to
trim down `ele.rs` anyway, since that mess is large and a lot to grok.
My debugging was trying to figure out why Rust was failing to derive
`PartialEq` on `NtError` because of `AttrParseError`. As it turns out,
`AttrParseError::InvalidValue` was failing, thus the introduction of the
`PartialEq` trait bound on `AttrParseState::ValueError`. Figuring this out
required implementing `PartialEq` myself without `derive` (well, using LSP,
which did all the work for me).
I'm not sure why this was not failing previously, which is a bit of a
concern, though perhaps in the context of the macro-expanded code, Rust was
able to properly resolve the types.
DEV-7145
The `ele_parse!` macro is a monstrosity, and expands into many different
identifiers. The hope is that chipping away at things like this will not
only make the template easier to understand by framing portions of the
problem in terms of more traditional Rust code, but will also hopefully
reduce compile times by reducing the amount of code that is expanded by the
macro.
DEV-7145
This introduces NIR, but only as an accepting grammar; it doesn't yet emit
the NIR IR, beyond TODOs.
This modifies `tamec` to, while copying XIR, also attempt to lower NIR to
produce parser errors, if any. It does not yet fail compilation, as I just
want to be cautious and observe that everything's working properly for a
little while as people use it, before I potentially break builds.
This is the culmination of months of supporting effort. The NIR grammar is
derived from our existing TAME sources internally, which I use for now as a
test case until I introduce test cases directly into TAMER later on (I'd do
it now, if I hadn't spent so much time on this; I'll start introducing tests
as I begin emitting NIR tokens). This is capable of fully parsing our
largest system with >900 packages, as well as `core`.
`tamec`'s lowering is a mess; that'll be cleaned up in future commits. The
same can be said about `tameld`.
NIR's grammar has some initial documentation, but this will improve over
time as well.
The generated docs still need some improvement, too, especially with
generated identifiers; I just want to get this out here for testing.
DEV-7145
This includes when on the last state / expecting a close.
Previously, there were a couple major issues:
1. After parsing an NT, we can't allow preemption because we must emit a
dead state so that we can remove the NT from the stack, otherwise
they'll never close (until the parent does) and that results in
unbounded stack growth for a lot of siblings. Therefore, we cannot
preempt on `Text`, which causes the NT to receive it, emit a dead
state, transition away from the NT, and not accept another NT of the
same type after `Text`.
2. When encountering an unknown element, the error message stated that a
closing tag was expected rather than one of the elements accepted by the
final NT.
For #1, this was solved by allowing the parent to transition back to the NT
if it would have been matched by the previous NT. A future change may
therefore allow us to remove repetition handling entirely and allow the
parent to deal with it (maybe).
For #2, the trouble is with the parser generator macro---we don't have a
good way of knowing the last NT, and the last NT may not even exist if none
was provided. This solution is a compromise, after having tried and failed
at many others; I desperately need to move on, and this results in the
correct behavior and doesn't sacrifice performance. But it can be done
better in the future.
It's also worth noting for #2 that the behavior isn't _entirely_ desirable,
but in practice it is mostly correct. Specifically, if we encounter an
unknown token, we're going to blow through all NTs until the last one, which
will be forced to handle it. After that, we cannot return to a previous NT,
and so we've forefitted the ability to parse anything that came before it.
NIR's grammar is such that sequences are rare and, if present, there's
really only ever two NTs, and so this awkward behavior will rarely cause
practical issues. With that said, it ought to be improved in the future,
but let's wait to see if other parts of the lowering pipeline provide more
appropriate places to handle some of these things (even though it really
ought to be handled at the grammar level).
But I'm well out of time to spend on this. I have to move on.
DEV-7145
`ele_parse!` was recently converted to accept zero-or-more for every NT to
simplify the parser-generator, since NIR isn't going to be able to
accurately determine whether child requirements are met anyway (because of
the template system).
This ensures that `Close` can be accepted when we're expecting an
element. It also adds a test for a scenario that's causing me some trouble
in stashed code so that I can ensure that it doesn't break.
DEV-7145
This sets the maximum depth to 64, which is still arbitrary, but
unfortunately the sum types introduce multiple levels of nesting, in
particular for template applications, so nested applications can result in a
fairly large stack.
I have various ideas to improve upon that---limited a bit in that repetition
as it is current implemented inhibits tail calls---but they're not worth
doing just yet relative to other priorities. The impact of this change is
not significant.
DEV-7145
This removes support for configurable repetition.
What? Why?
As it turns out, the complexity that repetition adds is quite significant
and is not worth the effort. The truth is that NIR is going to have to
allow zero-or-more matches on virtually everything _anyway_ because template
application is allowed virtually anywhere---it is not possible to fully
statically analyze TAME's sources because templates can expand into just
about anything. Given that, AIR (or something down the line) is going to
have to supply the necessary invariants instead.
It does suck, though, that this removes a lot of code that I fairly recently
wrote, and spent a decent amount of time on. But it's important to know
when to cut your losses.
Perhaps I could have planned better, but deriving this whole system as been
quite the experiment.
DEV-7145
If attributes fail to parse (e.g. missing required attribute) and parsing
reaches a dead state, this will recover by ignoring the entire element. It
previously panicked with a TODO.
DEV-7145
These were initially used to prevent conflicts with generated variants, but
we are no longer generating such variants since they're being jumped to via
the trampoline.
DEV-7145
I'm starting to clean up some TODOs, and this was a glaring one causing
panics when encountered. The recovery for this is simple, because we have
no choice: just stop parsing; leave it to the next lowering operation(s) to
complain that we didn't provide what was necessary. They'll have to,
anyway, since templates mean that NIR cannot ever have enough information to
guarantee that a document is well-formed, relative to what would expand from
the template.
DEV-7145
This allows for a construction like this:
```
ele_parse! {
[...]
StmtX := QN_X {
[...]
};
StmtY := QN_Y {
[...]
};
ExprA := QN_A {
[...]
};
ExprB := QN_B {
[...]
};
Expr := (A | B);
Stmt := (StmtX | StmtY);
// This previously was not allowed:
StmtOrExpr := (Stmt | Expr);
}
```
There were initially two barriers to doing so:
1. Efficiently matching; and
2. Outputting diagnostic information about the union of all expected
elements.
The first was previously resolved with the introduction of `NT::matches`,
which is macro-expanded in a way that Rust will be able to optimize a
bit. Worst case, it's effectively a linear search, but our Sum NTs are not
that deep in practice, so I don't expect that to be a concern.
The concern that I was trying to avoid was heap-allocated `NodeMatcher`s to
avoid recursive data structures, since that would have put heap access in a
very hot code path, which is not an option.
That left problem #2, which ended up being the harder problem. The solution
was detailed in the previous commit, so you should look there, but it
amounts to being able to format individual entries as if they were a part
of a list by making them a function of not just the matcher itself, but also
the number of items in (recursively) the sum type and the position of the
matcher relative to that list. The list length is easily
computed (recursively) at compile-time using `const`
functions (`NT::matches_n`).
And with that, NIR can be abstracted in sane ways using Sum NTs without a
bunch of duplication that would have been a maintenance burden and an
inevitable source of bugs (from having to duplicate NT references).
DEV-7145
This exposes the internal rendering of `ListDisplayWrapper::fmt` such that
we can output a list without actually creating a list. This is used in an
upcoming change for =ele_parse!= so that Sum NTs can render the union of all
the QNames that their constituent NTs match on, recursively, as a single
list, without having to create an ephemeral collection only for display.
If Rust supports const functions for arrays/Vecs in the future, we could
generate this at compile-time, if we were okay with the (small) cost, but
this solution seems just fine. But output may be even _more_ performant
since they'd all be adjacent in memory.
This is used in these secenarios:
1. Diagnostic messages;
2. Error messages (overlaps with #1); and
3. `Display::fmt` of the `ParseState`s themselves.
The reason that we want this to be reasonably performant is because #3
results in a _lot_ of output---easily GiB of output depending on what is
being traced. Adding heap allocations to this would make it even slower,
since a description is generated for each individual trace.
Anyway, this is a fairly simple solution, albeit a little bit less clear,
and only came after I had tried a number of other different approaches
related to recursively constructing QName lists at compile time; they
weren't worth the effort when this was so easy to do.
DEV-7145
This allows using a `[attr]` special form to stream attributes as they are
encountered rather than aggregating a static attribute list. This is
necessary in particular for short-hand template application and short-hand
function application, since the attribute names are derived from template
and function parameter lists, which are runtime values.
The syntax for this is a bit odd since there's a semi-useless and confusing
`@ {} => obj` still, but this is only going to be used by a couple of NTs
and it's not worth the time to clean this up, given the rather significant
macro complexity already.
DEV-7145
This uses the same mechanism that was introduced for handling `Text` nodes
in mixed content, allowing for arbitrary element `Open` matches for
preemption by the superstate.
This will be used to allow for template expansion virtually
anywhere. Unlike the existing TAME, it'll even allow for it at the root,
though whether that's ultimately permitted is really depending on how I
approach template expansion; it may fail during a later lowering operation.
This is interesting because this approach is only possible because of the
CPS-style trampoline implementation. Previously, with the composition-based
approach, each and every parser would have to perform this check, like we
had to previously with `Text` nodes.
As usual, this is still adding to the mess a bit, and it'll need some future
cleanup.
DEV-7145
This introduces the concept of superstate node preemption generally, which I
hope to use for template application as well, since templates can appear in
essentially any (syntatically valid, for XML) position.
This implements mixed content handling by defining the mapping on the
superstate itself, which really simplifies the problem but foregoes
fine-grained text handling. I had hoped to avoid that, but oh well.
This pushes the responsibility of whether text is semantically valid at that
position to NIR->AIR lowering (which we're not transition to yet), which is
really the better place for it anyway, since this is just the grammar. The
lowering to AIR will need to validate anyway given that template expansion
happens after NIR.
Moving on!
DEV-7145
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100332
The above MR replaces `log10` and friends with `ilog10`; this is the first
time an unstable feature bit us in a substantially backwards-incompatible
way that's a pain to deal with.
Fortunately, I'm just not going to deal with it: this is used with the
diagnostic system, which isn't yet used by our projects (outside of me
testing), and so those builds shouldn't fail before people upgrade.
This is now pending stabalization with the new name, so hopefully we're good
now:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/70887#issuecomment-1210602692
This was accepting an early EOF when the active child `ParseState` was in an
accepting state, because it was not ensuring that anything on the stack was
also accepting.
Ideally, there should be nothing on the stack, and hopefully in the future
that's what happens. But with how things are today, it's important that, if
anything is on the stack, it is accepting.
Since `is_accepting` on the superstate is only called during finalization,
and because the check terminates early, and because the stack practically
speaking will only have a couple things on it max (unless we're in tail
position in a deeply nested tree, without TCO [yet]), this shouldn't be an
expensive check.
Implementing this did require that we expose `Context` to `is_accepting`,
which I had hoped to avoid having to do, but here we are.
DEV-7145
Along with this change we also had to change how we handle dead states in
the superstate. So there were two problems here:
1. Sum states were not yielding a dead state after recovery, which meant
that parsing was unable to continue (we still have a `todo!`); and
2. The superstate considered it an error when there was nothing left on
the stack, because I assumed that ought not happen.
Regarding #2---it _shouldn't_ happen, _unless_ we have extra input after we
have completed parsing. Which happens to be the case for this test case,
but more importantly, we shouldn't be panicing with errors about TAMER bugs
if somebody puts extra input after a closing root tag in a source file.
DEV-7145
This does two things:
1. Places the expected list on a separate help line as a footnote where
it'll be a bit more tolerable when it inevitably overflows the terminal
width in certain contexts (we may wrap in the future); and
2. Removes angled brackets from the element names so that they (a) better
correspond with the span which highlights only the element name and (b)
do not imply that the elements take no attributes.
DEV-7145
When we match a QName against a namespace, we ought to store the matching
QName to use (a) in error messages and (b) to make available as a
binding. The former is necessary for sensible errors (rather than saying
that it's e.g. expecting a closing `t:*`) and the latter is necessary for
e.g. getting the template name out of `t:foo`.
DEV-7145
This allows matching on a namespace prefix by providing a `Prefix` instead
of a `QName`. This works, but is missing a couple notable things (and
possibly more):
1. Tracking the QName that is _actually_ matched so that it can be used in
messages stating what the expected closing tag is; and
2. Making that QName available via a binding.
This will be used to match on `t:*` in NIR. If you're wondering how
attribute parsing is supposed to work with that (of course you're wondering
that, random person reading this)---that'll have to work differently for
those matches, since template shorthand application contains argument names
as attributes.
DEV-7145
This introduces `NodeMatcher`, with the intent of introducing wildcard QName
matches for e.g. `t:*` nodes. It's not yet clear if I'll expand this to
support text nodes yet, or if I'll convert text nodes into elements to
re-use the existing system (which I had initially planned on doing, but
didn't because of the work and expense (token expansion) involved in the
conversion).
DEV-7145
I need to move on, and there are (a) a couple different ways to proceed that
I want to mull over and (b) upcoming changes that may influence my decision
one way or another.
DEV-7145
This will utilize the superstate's error object in place of nested errors,
which was the result of the previous composition-based delegation.
As you can see, all we had to do was remove the special handling of these
errors; the existing delegation setup continues to handle the types properly
with no change. The composition continues to work for `*Attr_`.
The alternative was to box inner errors, since they're far from the hot code
path, but that's clearly unnecessary.
To be clear: this is necessary to allow for recursive grammars in
`ele_parse` without creating recursive data structures in Rust.
DEV-7145
Comments ought not have any more semantic meaning than whitespace. Other
languages may have conventions that allow for various types of things in
comments, like annotations, but those are symptoms of language
limitations---we control the source language here.
DEV-7145
This properly integrates the trampoline into `ele_parse!`. The
implementation leaves some TODOs, most notably broken mixed text handling
since we can no longer intercept those tokens before passing to the
child. That is temporarily marked as incomplete; see a future commit.
The introduced test `ParseState`s were to help me reason about the system
intuitively as I struggled to track down some type errors in the monstrosity
that is `ele_parse!`. It will fail to compile if those invariants are
violated. (In the end, the problems were pretty simple to resolve, and the
struggle was the type system doing its job in telling me that I needed to
step back and try to reason about the problem again until it was intuitive.)
This keeps around the NT states for now, which are quickly used to
transition to the next NT state, like a couple of bounces on a trampoline:
NT -> Dead -> Parent -> Next NT
This could be optimized in the future, if it's worth doing.
This also makes no attempt to implement tail calls; that would have to come
after fixing mixed content and really isn't worth the added complexity
now. I (desperately) need to move on, and still have a bunch of cleanup to
do.
I had hoped for a smaller commit, but that was too difficult to do with all
the types involved.
DEV-7145
This change introduces diagnostic messages for panics. The intent is to be
able to use panics in situations where it is either not possible to or not
worth the time to recover from errors and ensure a consistent/sensible
system state. In those situations, we still ought to be able to provide the
user with useful information to attempt to get unstuck, since the error is
surely in response to some particular input, and maybe that input can be
tweaked to work around the problem.
Ideally, invalid states are avoided using the type system and statically
verified at compile-time. But this is not always possible, or in some cases
may be way more effort or cause way more code complexity than is worth,
given the unliklihood of the error occurring.
With that said, it's been interesting, over the past >10y that TAME has
existed, seeing how unlikely errors do sometimes pop up many years after
they were written. It's also interesting to have my intuition of what is
"unlikely" challenged, but hopefully it holds generally.
DEV-7145
I had previously used `Context` to hold the parser configuration for
repetition, since that was the easier option. But I now want to utilize the
`Context` for a stack for the superstate trampoline, and I don't want to
have to deal with the awkwardness of the repetition in doing so, since it
requires that the configuration be created during delegation, rather than
just being passed through to all child parsers.
This adds to a mess that needs cleaning up, but I'll do that after
everything is working.
DEV-7145
And here's the thing that I've been dreading, partly because of the
`macro_rules` issues involved. But, it's not too terrible.
This module was already large and complex, and this just adds to it---it's
in need of refactoring, but I want to be sure it's fully working and capable
of handling NIR before I go spending time refactoring only to undo it.
_This does not yet use trampolining in place of the call stack._ That'll
come next; I just wanted to get the macro updated, the superstate generated,
and tests passing. This does convert into the
superstate (`ParseState::Super`), but then converts back to the original
`ParseState` for BC with the existing composition-based delegation. That
will go away and will then use the equivalent of CPS, using the
superstate+`Parser` as a trampoline. This will require an explicit stack
via `Context`, like XIRF. And it will allow for tail calls, with respect to
parser delegation, if I decide it's worth doing.
The root problem is that source XML requires recursive parsing (for
expressions and statements like `<section>`), which results in recursive
data structures (`ParseState` enum variants). Resolving this with boxing is
not appropriate, because that puts heap indirection in an extremely hot code
path, and may also inhibit the aggressive optimizations that I need Rust to
perform to optimize away the majority of the lowering pipeline.
Once this is sorted out, this should be the last big thing for the
parser. This unfortunately has been a nagging and looming issue for months,
that I was hoping to avoid, and in retrospect that was naive.
DEV-7145
I'm disappointed that I keep having to implement features that I had hoped
to avoid implementing.
This introduces a "superstate" feature, which is intended really just to be
a sum type that is able to delegate to stitched `ParseState`s. This then
allows a `ParseState` to transition directly to another `ParseState` and
have the parent `ParseState` handle the delegation---a trampoline.
This issue naturally arises out of the recursive nature of parsing a TAME
XML document, where certain statements can be nested (like `<section>`), and
where expressions can be nested. I had gotten away with composition-based
delegation for now because `xmlo` headers do not have such nesting.
The composition-based approach falls flat for recursive structures. The
typical naive solution is boxing, which I cannot do, because not only is
this on an extremely hot code path, but I require that Rust be able to
deeply introspect and optimize away the lowering pipeline as much as
possible.
Many months ago, I figured that such a solution would require a trampoline,
as it typically does in stack-based languages, but I was hoping to avoid
it. Well, no longer; let's just get on with it.
This intends to implement trampolining in a `ParseState` that serves as that
sum type, rather than introducing it as yet another feature to `Parser`; the
latter would provide a more convenient API, but it would continue to bloat
`Parser` itself. Right now, only the element parser generator will require
use of this, so if it's needed beyond that, then I'll debate whether it's
worth providing a better abstraction. For now, the intent will be to use
the `Context` to store a stack that it can pop off of to restore the
previous `ParseState` before delegation.
DEV-7145
Since we'll never be reading past the header, this is all that is needed.
If in the future this is violated, XIRF will cause a nice diagnostic error
displaying precisely what opening tag caused the increased level of nesting,
which will aid in debugging and allow us to determine if it ought to be
increased. Here's an example, if I set the max to `3`:
error: maximum XML element nesting depth of `3` exceeded
--> /home/.../foo.xmlo:261:10
|
261 | <preproc:sym-ref name=":_vproduct:vector_a"/>
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ error: this opening tag increases the level of nesting past the limit of 3
Of course, the longer-term goal is to do away with `xmlo` entirely.
This had no (perceivable via `/usr/bin/time -v`, at least) impact on memory
or CPU time.
DEV-7145
"Mixed content" is the XML term representing element nodes mixed with text
nodes. For example, `foo <strong>bar</strong> baz` is mixed.
TAME supports text nodes as documentation, intended to be in a literate
style but never fully realized. In any case, we need to permit them, and I
wanted to do more than just ignore the nodes.
This takes a different approach than typical parser delegation---it has the
parent parser _preempt_ the child by intercepting text before delegation
takes place, rather than having the child reject the token (or possibly
interpret it itself!) and have to handle an error or dead state.
And while this makes it more confusing in terms of state machine stitching,
it does make sense, in the sense that the parent parser is really what
"owns" the text node---the parser is delegating _element_ parsing only, take
asserts authority when necessary to take back control where it shouldn't be
delegated.
DEV-7145
Previously a `Depth` was provided only for `Open` and `Close`. This depth
information, for example, will be used by NIR to quickly determine whether a
given parser ought to assert ownership of a text/comment token rather than
delegating it.
This involved modifying a number of test cases, but it's worth repeating in
these commits that this is intentional---I've been bit in the past using
`..` in contexts where I really do want to know if variant fields change so
that I can consider whether and how that change may affect the code
utilizing that variant.
DEV-7145
Recent changes regarding whitespace were all to support this change (though
it was also needed for XIRF, pre- and post-root).
Now I'll have to conted with how I want to handle text nodes in various
circumstances, in terms of `ele_parse!`.
DEV-7145
Various DUMMY_SPAN-derived spans are used by many test cases, so this
finally extracts them---something I've been meaning to do for some time.
This also places DUMMY_SPAN behind a `cfg(test)` directive to ensure that it
is _only_ used in tests; UNKNOWN_SPAN should be used when a span is actually
unknown, which may also be the case during development.
DEV-7145
Whether or not quoting is appropriate depends on context, and that parent
context is already performing the quoting. For example:
error: expected `</rater>`, but found `<import>`
--> /home/[...]/foo.xml:2:1
|
2 | <rater xmlns="http://www.lovullo.com/rater"
| ------ note: element starts here
--> /home/[...]/foo.xml:7:3
|
7 | <import package="/rater/core/base" />
| ^^^^^^^ error: expected `</rater>`
In these cases (obviously I'm still working on the parser, since this is
nonsense), the parser is responsible for quoting the token "<import>".
DEV-7145
There were two problem errors: one showing "element element" and one showing
the value along with the name of the attribute.
The change for `<Attr as Display>::fmt` is debatable. I'm going to do this
for now (only show `@name`) and adjust later if necessary.
I'll need to go use `crate::fmt` consistently in previously-existing format
strings at some point, too.
DEV-7145
This teaches XIRF to optionally refine Text into RefinedText, which
determines whether the given SymbolId represents entirely whitespace.
This is something I've been putting off for some time, but now that I'm
parsing source language for NIR, it is necessary, in that we can only permit
whitespace Text nodes in certain contexts.
The idea is to capture the most common whitespace as preinterned
symbols. Note that this heuristic ought to be determined from scanning a
codebase, which I haven't done yet; this is just an initial list.
The fallback is to look up the string associated with the SymbolId and
perform a linear scan, aborting on the first non-whitespace character. This
combination of checks should be sufficiently performant for now considering
that this is only being run on source files, which really are not all that
large. (They become large when template-expanded.) I'll optimize further
if I notice it show up during profiling.
This also frees XIR itself from being concerned by Whitespace. Initially I
had used quick-xml's whitespace trimming, but it messed up my span
calculations, and those were a pain in the ass to implement to begin with,
since I had to resort to pointer arithmetic. I'd rather avoid tweaking it.
tameld will not check for whitespace, since it's not important---xmlo files,
if malformed, are the fault of the compiler; we can ignore text nodes except
in the context of code fragments, where they are never whitespace (unless
that's also a compiler bug).
Onward and yonward.
DEV-7145
The trace outputs a note in the footer indicating _why_ it's being output,
so that the reader understands both where the potentially-unexpected
behavior originates from and so they know (in the case of the feature flag)
how to inhibit it.
That information originally lived in `Parser`, where the `cfg` directive to
enable it lives, but it was moved into the abstraction. This corrects that.
DEV-7145
This has gotten large and was cluttering `feed_tok`. This also provides the
ability to more easily expand into other types of tracing in the future.
DEV-7145
This information is likely redundant in a lowering pipeline, but is more
useful outside of such a pipeline. It's also more clear.
`Object` does not implement `Display`, though, because that's too burdensome
for how it's currently used. Many `Object`s are also `Token`s though and,
if fed to another `Parser` for lowering, it'll get `Display::fmt`'d.
DEV-7145
Rust was warning that `cfg` was unused if both `test` and
`parser-trace-stderr`. This both allows that and adjusts the precedence to
make more sense for tests.
DEV-7145
Because of recovery, the trace otherwise paints a really confusing-looking
picture when given unexpected input.
This is large enough now that it really ought to be extracted from
`feed_tok`, but I'll wait to see how this evolves further. I considered
adding color too, but it's not yet clear to me that the visual noise will be
all that helpful.
DEV-7145
This flag allows toggling the parser trace that was previously only
available to tests. Unfortunately, at the time of writing, Cargo cannot
enable flags in profiles, so I have to check for either `test` or this flag
being set to enable relevant features.
This trace is useful as I start to run the parser against existing code
written in TAME so that our existing systems can help to guide my
development. Unlike the current tests, it also allows seeing real-world
data as part of the lowering pipeline, where multiple `Parser`s are in
play.
Having this feature flag also makes this feature more easily discoverable to
those wishing to observe how the lowering pipeline works.
DEV-7145
impl for `&Token` instead of Token; the writer is just copying data into the
destination stream anyway.
This will allow us to continue writing the token while also using it for
further processing, like `tee`.
DEV-7145
We need to be able to export generated identifiers. Trying to figure out a
syntax for this was a bit tricky considering how much is generated, so I
just settled on something that's reasonably clear and easy to parse with
`macro_rules!`.
I had intended to just make everything public by default and encapsulate
using private modules, but that then required making everything else that it
uses public (e.g. error and token objects), which would have been a bizarre
thing to do in e.g. test cases.
DEV-7145
Values can be parsed using `TryFrom<Attr>`. Previously only `From<Attr>`
was supported, which could not fail.
This is critical for parsing values into types, which will wrap `SymbolId`
to provide data assurances.
DEV-7145
The tests had certain things in scope, but now that I'm trying to use it
outside of those modules, some fixes are needed.
This is admittedly a sloppy commit, with a number of miscellaneous fixes. I
didn't bother separating it more because most of them are type fixes, and
the `From<Attr>` stuff is going to have to change into, likely,
`TryFrom<Attr>` so that parse failures can occur when attributes do not
match certain patterns.
DEV-7145
The only additional information needed was opening spans so that we can
provide useful information regarding closing tags.
This uses a generic Span in place of {Open,Close}Span because the latter
wasn't necessary, but more descriptive types would be nice; it may be
beneficial later on to introduce newtypes for each of the span generated by
{Open,Close}Span.
DEV-7145
This was a TODO for the attribute parser generator. The first attribute
will be kept and later ones will be ignored, producing an error. Recovery
permits further attribute parsing having ignored the duplicate.
DEV-7145
This allows an element to be repeated by the parent NT. The easiest way I
saw to implement this for now was to abuse the Context to provide a runtime
configuration that would allow the state machine to reset after it has
completed parsing.
This also influences error recovery, in that if we're expecting zero or more
of something, we cannot provide an error for an unexpected name, and instead
must emit a dead state so that the caller can determine what to do.
DEV-7145
This produces useful parse traces that are output as part of a failing test
case. The parser generator macros can be a bit confusing to deal with when
things go wrong, so this helps to clarify matters.
This is _not_ intended to be machine-readable, but it does show that it
would be possible to generate machine-readable output to visualize the
entire lowering pipeline. Perhaps something for the future.
I left these inline in Parser::feed_tok because they help to elucidate what
is going on, just by reading what the trace would output---that is, it helps
to make the method more self-documenting, albeit a tad bit more
verbose. But with that said, it should probably be extracted at some point;
I don't want this to set a precedent where composition is feasible.
Here's an example from test cases:
[Parser::feed_tok] (input IR: XIRF)
| ==> Parser before tok is parsing attributes for `package`.
| | Attrs_(SutAttrsState_ { ___ctx: (QName(None, LocalPart(NCName(SymbolId(46 "package")))), OpenSpan(Span { len: 0, offset: 0, ctx: Context(SymbolId(1 "#!DUMMY")) }, 10)), ___done: false })
|
| ==> XIRF tok: `<unexpected>`
| | Open(QName(None, LocalPart(NCName(SymbolId(82 "unexpected")))), OpenSpan(Span { len: 0, offset: 1, ctx: Context(SymbolId(1 "#!DUMMY")) }, 10), Depth(1))
|
| ==> Parser after tok is expecting opening tag `<classify>`.
| | ChildA(Expecting_)
| | Lookahead: Some(Lookahead(Open(QName(None, LocalPart(NCName(SymbolId(82 "unexpected")))), OpenSpan(Span { len: 0, offset: 1, ctx: Context(SymbolId(1 "#!DUMMY")) }, 10), Depth(1))))
= note: this trace was output as a debugging aid because `cfg(test)`.
[Parser::feed_tok] (input IR: XIRF)
| ==> Parser before tok is expecting opening tag `<classify>`.
| | ChildA(Expecting_)
|
| ==> XIRF tok: `<unexpected>`
| | Open(QName(None, LocalPart(NCName(SymbolId(82 "unexpected")))), OpenSpan(Span { len: 0, offset: 1, ctx: Context(SymbolId(1 "#!DUMMY")) }, 10), Depth(1))
|
| ==> Parser after tok is attempting to recover by ignoring element with unexpected name `unexpected` (expected `classify`).
| | ChildA(RecoverEleIgnore_(QName(None, LocalPart(NCName(SymbolId(82 "unexpected")))), OpenSpan(Span { len: 0, offset: 1, ctx: Context(SymbolId(1 "#!DUMMY")) }, 10), Depth(1)))
| | Lookahead: None
= note: this trace was output as a debugging aid because `cfg(test)`.
DEV-7145
This resolves a TODO by including the name of the element whose attributes
are currently being parsed.
This also frees a parent from having to provide additional context, allowing
Display to be fully delegated when stitching.
DEV-7145
This introduces `Nt := (A | ... | Z);`, where `Nt` is the name of the
nonterminal and `A ... Z` are the inner nonterminals---it produces a parser
that provides a choice between a set of nonterminals.
This is implemented efficiently by understanding the QName that is accepted
by each of the inner nonterminals and delegating that token immediately to
the appropriate parser. This is a benefit of using a parser generator macro
over parser combinators---we do not need to implement backtracking by
letting inner parsers fail, because we know ahead of time exactly what
parser we need.
This _does not_ verify that each of the inner parsers accept a unique QName;
maybe at a later time I can figure out something for that. However, because
this compiles into a `match`, there is no ambiguity---like a PEG parser,
there is precedence in the face of an ambiguous token, and the first one
wins. Consequently, tests would surely fail, since the latter wouldn't be
able to be parsed.
This also demonstrates how we can have good error suggestions for this
parsing framework: because the inner nonterminals and their QNames are known
at compile time, error messages simply generate a list of QNames that are
expected.
The error recovery strategy is the same as previously noted, and subject to
the same concerns, though it may be more appropriate here: it is desirable
for the inner parser to fail rather than retrying, so that the sum parser is
able to fail and, once the Kleene operator is introduced, retry on another
potential element. But again, that recovery strategy may happen to work in
some cases, but'll fail miserably in others (e.g. placing an unknown element
at the head of a block that expects a sequence of elements would potentially
fail the entire block rather than just the invalid one). But more to come
on that later; it's not critical at this point. I need to get parsing
completed for TAME's input language.
DEV-7145
This adds the ability to bind identifiers to represent `OpenSpan` and
`CloseSpan`, available to the `@` and `/` maps. Since identifiers in TAME
originate from attributes, this may not get a whole lot of use, but it's
important to be available.
There is some awkwardness in that the opening span appears to be scoped to
the entire nonterminal, but it's actually only available in the `@`
mapping. I'll change this if it's actually needed; this keeps things simple
for now.
DEV-7145
Since the parsers produce streaming IRs, we need to be able to emit tokens
representing closing delimiters, where they are important.
This notably doesn't use spans; I'll add those next, since they're also
needed for the previous work.
DEV-7145
The comment explains the issue. I don't think the strategy is going to be a
desirable one, but I want to move on and observe in retrospect how it ought
to be handled.
The important part right now is that recovery is accounted for and possible,
which was a long-standing concern.
DEV-7145
This begins generating parsers that are capable of parsing elements. I need
to move on, so this abstraction isn't going to go as far as it could, but
let's see where it takes me.
This was the work that required the recent lookahead changes, which has been
detailed in previous commits.
This initial support is basic, but robust. It supports parsing elements
with attributes and children, but it does not yet support the equivalent of
the Kleene star (`*`). Such support will likely be added by supporting
parsers that are able to recurse on their own definition in tail position,
which will also require supporting parsers that do not add to the stack.
This generates parsers that, like all the other parsers, use enums to
provide a typed stack. Stitched parsers produce a nested stack that is
always bounded in size. Fortunately, expressions---which can nest
deeply---do not need to maintain ancestor context on the stack, and so this
should work fine; we can get away with this because XIRF ensures proper
nesting for us. Statements that _do_ need to maintain such context are not
nested.
This also does not yet support emitting an object on closing tag, which
will be necessary for NIR, which will be a streaming IR that is "near" to
the source XML in structure. This will then be used to lower into AIR for
the ASG, which gives structure needed for further analysis.
More information to come; I just want to get this committed to serve as a
mental synchronization point and clear my head, since I've been sitting on
these changes for so long and have to keep stashing them as I tumble down
rabbit holes covered in yak hair.
DEV-7145
Having the lookahead token generic over the `ParseState` was a pain in the
ass for stitching, since they shared the same token type but not the same
parser. I don't expect there to be any need to be able to infer other
parser-related types for a token of lookahead, so I'd rather just make my
life easier until such a thing is needed.
DEV-7145
Oh what a tortured journey. I had originally tried to avoid formalizing
lookahead for all parsers by pretending that it was only needed for dead
state transitions (that is---states that have no transitions for a given
input token), but then I needed to yield information for aggregation. So I
added the ability to override the token for `Dead` to yield that, in
addition to the token. But then I also needed to yield lookahead for error
conditions. It was a mess that didn't make sense.
This eliminates `ParseStatus::Dead` entirely and fully integrates the
lookahead token in `Parser` that was previously implemented.
Notably, the lookahead token is encapsulated in `TransitionResult` and
unavailable to `ParseState` implementations, forcing them to rely on
`Parser` for recursion. This not only prevents `ParseState` from recursing,
but also simplifies delegation by removing the need to manually handle
tokens of lookahead.
The awkward case here is XIRT, which does not follow the streaming parsing
convention, because it was conceived before the parsing framework. It needs
to go away, but doing so right now would be a lot of work, so it has to
stick around for a little bit longer until the new parser generators can be
used instead. It is a persistent thorn in my side, going against the grain.
`Parser` will immediately recurse if it sees a token of lookahead with an
incomplete parse. This is because stitched parsers will frequently yield a
dead state indication when they're done parsing, and there's no use in
propagating an `Incomplete` status down the entire lowering pipeline. But,
that does mean that the toplevel is not the only thing recursing. _But_,
the behavior doesn't really change, in the sense that it would infinitely
recurse down the entire lowering stack (though there'd be an opportunity to
detect that). This should never happen with a correct parser, but it's not
worth the effort right now to try to force such a thing with Rust's type
system. Something like TLA+ is better suited here as an aid, but it
shouldn't be necessary with clear implementations and proper test
cases. Parser generators will also ensure such a thing cannot occur.
I had hoped to remove ParseStatus entirely in favor of Parsed, but there's a
lot of type inference that happens based on the fact that `ParseStatus` has
a `ParseState` type parameter; `Parsed` has only `Object`. It is desirable
for a public-facing `Parsed` to not be tied to `ParseState`, since consumers
need not be concerned with such a heavy type; however, we _do_ want that
heavy type internally, as it carries a lot of useful information that allows
for significant and powerful type inference, which in turn creates
expressive and convenient APIs.
DEV-7145
*NB: This is the initial change to introduce the token of lookahead, but this
does not fully integrate it. In particular, this is missing from the
stitching/delegation layer.*
This has been a long time coming, I suppose, though I had tried to avoid it
with `Parser::delegate_lookahead`. But the problem with doing that is that
it forced the ParserState to recurse, which both violates that I want no
looping constructs except for the toplevel, and performs additional stack
allocation as it is not in tail position.
The final straw was having to both return an error _and_ an aggregate object
for the attribute parser when an unexpected element is encountered (this
code is not yet committed). One option was to add a recovery object to the
error object, and formalize that, but then we have other concerns; for
example, what if that recovery object triggered an error? We'd have to mask
either the old or the new error. But we wouldn't want to mask either,
because the object causing the error would be the aggregate attributes,
which is _not_ a recovery object, but actual data we want to emit. And so
it's a kluge right off of the bat.
The use of a token of lookahaed is a more traditional approach and has uses
outside of just this one scenario. It'll also allow for the removal of
recursion from the existing ParserStates, and possibly the elimination of
dead state associated data, though I may end up leaving that; more to come.
Rust will also optimize away lookahead storage and processing in Parsers
that do not utilize it.
DEV-7145
I'd feel rather silly if I used `debug_assert!` for the sake of tests and
they weren't actually being run due to optimization settings.
This is just to catch potential future regressions; all is well today.
DEV-7145
There was only one test outside of the `parse` module using these
fields. The next commit will be introducing lookahead, and I do not want to
have to trust callers to ensure invariants are met.
DEV-7145
This reverts commit b973d36862.
Alright, I'm getting sick of fighting with myself on this. But rather than
just removing the last commit, I'm going to keep it around, so that my
thoughts are clearly documented for my future quarrels with myself.
Firstly: this added more overhead than I wanted it to. While it wasn't
significant, it did add 100--150ms to one of our largest systems, up from
~2.8s, which seems a bit much for a token that's really just meant to make
life easier for the parser.
Further, it seems that all I've managed to do is push my original problem to
a different layer---this started as a means to resolve having to emit both
an object and an error simultaneously in the case where aggregate attribute
parsing has completed, but we encounter an error on the next token (e.g. an
unexpected element). But XIRF, if it's missing AttrEnd, should throw an
error, but should also recover. Recovery is easy---just assume that it was
present---_but then we don't emit a XIRF `AttrEnd` token_, which is
necessary for downstream systems. So we'd need to either:
(a) emit both a token and an error; or
(b) panic.
But if we're doing (a), then the need for `AttrEnd` goes away, because it
solves the original problem (though the other concerns of the previous
commit still stand). (b) is not ideal at all, even though the missing token
does represent an internal system error; it's not something the user can
correct. But, given that it's something that the user cannot correct,
doesn't that imply that it's an awkward thing to include in the token
stream? So back to `AttrEnd` being an awkward PITA to have.
So, given (a), I'll just do that: errors will become more of a "hey, this
error just occurred, but I'm trying to recover---here's an object that you
should use if you choose to continue parsing, but it may or may not be what
you're looking for; proceed with caution". That flips the original script:
I imagined having external systems feed recovery tokens, but this
encapsulates recovery within the parser, which really is more appropriate,
though less flexible than having an omniscient external recovery system;
such a monolith was always an awkward concept and would be difficult to
implement cleanly.
This can also potentially be implemented as a generalization of the Dead
state change that allowed an object to be emitted alongside the
lookahead/error.
Anyway, back to where I was...I'm sure I'll look back on this in the future
shaking my head, reflecting on how naive I was.
DEV-7145
AttrEnd was initially removed in
0cc0bc9d5a (and the commit prior), because
there was not a compelling reason to use it over a lookahead
operation (returning a token via the a dead state transition); `AttrEnd`
simply introduced inconsistencies between the XIR reader (which produced
AttrEnd) and internal XIR stream generators (e.g. the lowering operations
into XIR->XML, which do not).
But now that parsers are performing aggregation---in particular the
attribute parser-generator `xir::parse::attr`---this has become quite a
pain, because the dead state is an actionable token. For example:
1. Open
2. Attr
3. Attr
4. Open
5. ...
In the happy case, token #4 results in `Parsed::Incomplete`, and so can just
be transformed into the object representing the aggregated attributes. But
even in this happy path, it's ugly, and it requires non-tail recursion on
the parser which requires a duplicate stack allocation for the
`ParserState`. That violates a core principle of the system.
But if there is an error at #4---e.g. an unexpected element---then we no
longer have a `Parsed::Incomplete` to hijack for our own uses, and we'd have
to introduce the ability to return both an error and a token, or we'd have
to introduce the ability to keep a token of lookahead instead of reading
from the underlying token stream, but that's complicated with push parsers,
which are used for parser composition. Yikes.
And furthermore, the aggregation has caused me to introduce the ability to
override the dead state type to introduce both a token of lookahead and
aggregation information. This complicates the system and is going to be
confusing to others.
Given all of this, AttrEnd does now seem appropriate to reintroduce, since
it will allow processing of aggregate operations when encountering that
token without having to worry about the above scenario; without having to
duplicate a `ParseState` stack; without having to hijack dead state
transitions for producing our aggregate object; and everything else
mentioned above.
This commit does not modify those abstractions to use AttrEnd yet; it
re-introduces the token to the core system, not the parser-generators, and
it doesn't yet replace lookahead operations in the parsers that use
them. That'll come next. Unlike the commit that removed it, though, we are
now generating proper spans, so make note of that here. This also does not
introduce the concept to XIRF yet, which did not exist at the time that it
was removed, so XIRF is filtering it out until a following commit.
DEV-7145
This isn't conceptally all that significant of a change, but there was a lot
of modify to get it working. I would generally separate this into a commit
for the implementation and another commit for the integration, but I decided
to keep things together.
This serves a role similar to AttrSpan---this allows deriving a span
representing the element name from a span representing the entire XIR
token. This will provide more useful context for errors---including the tag
delimiter(s) means that we care about the fact that an element is in that
position (as opposed to some other type of node) within the context of an
error. However, if we are expecting an element but take issue with the
element name itself, we want to place emphasis on that instead.
This also starts to consider the issue of span contexts---a blob of detached
data that is `Span` is useful for error context, but it's not useful for
manipulation or deriving additional information. For that, we need to
encode additional context, and this is an attempt at that.
I am interested in the concept of providing Spans that are guaranteed to
actually make sense---that are instantiated and manipulated with APIs that
ensure consistency. But such a thing buys us very little, practically
speaking, over what I have now for TAMER, and so I don't expect to actually
implement that for this project; I'll leave that for a personal
project. TAMER's already take a lot of my personal interests and it can
cause me a lot of grief sometimes (with regards to letting my aspirations
cause me more work).
DEV-7145
Non-attribute and non-empty start/end tags will have their whitespace
as part of the produced span. This sets us up for a following change that
will allow for deriving the name span from this span given a QName, which
gives us a span that both represents the entire XIR token and allows
deriving the element name.
An accurate token span is necessary for parsing errors where an element was
not expected, while an element name span is more appropriate for issues of
grammar and semantic errors that deal not with the fact that an element was
encountered, but _what_ element was encountered.
DEV-7145
This both adds clarifying tests and corrects the case of `<foo/>`, where the
offset was erroneously off by one---it saw that there were no attributes and
added a byte thinking it'd include `>`, as in `<foo>`.
DEV-7145
This is the first parser generator for the parsing framework. I've been
waiting quite a while to do this because I wanted to be sure that I
understood how I intended to write the attribute parsers manually. Now that
I'm about to start parsing source XML files, it is necessary to have a
parser generator.
Typically one thinks of a parser generator as a separate program that
generates code for some language, but that is not always the case---that
represents a lack of expressiveness in the language itself (e.g. C). Here,
I simply use Rust's macro system, which should be a concept familiar to
someone coming from a language like Lisp.
This also resolves where I stand on parser combinators with respect to this
abstraction: they both accomplish the exact same thing (composition of
smaller parsers), but this abstraction doesn't do so in the typical
functional way. But the end result is the same.
The parser generated by this abstraction will be optimized an inlined in the
same manner as the hand-written parsers. Since they'll be tightly coupled
with an element parser (which too will have a parser generator), I expect
that most attribute parsers will simply be inlined; they exist as separate
parsers conceptually, for the same reason that you'd use parser combinators.
It's worth mentioning that this awkward reliance on dead state for a
lookahead token to determine when aggregation is complete rubs me the wrong
way, but resolving it would involve reintroducing the XIR AttrEnd that I had
previously removed. I'll keep fighting with myself on this, but I want to
get a bit further before I determine if it's worth the tradeoff of
reintroducing (more complex IR but simplified parsing).
DEV-7145
This was missed. It was not possible, using the documentation
alone (without looking at the linked source) to tell what the QName actually
represented, though you could assume by the name.
DEV-7145
This is partly an experiment, but is designed to simplify producing English
sentences in various contexts. It makes use of a not only unstable, but
incomplete, Rust feature---adt_const_params, for a static str const type
parameter. Hopefully that ends up being stabalized.
This uses types, but it's the same as function composition due to Rust's
monomorphization.
DEV-7145
`ParseState` originally required `Default` for use with `mem::take` in
`Parser::feed_tok`. This unfortunately cannot last, since more specialized
parsers require context during initialization in order to provide useful
diagnostic information. (The other option is to require the caller to
augment errors with diagnostic information, but that would have to be
duplicated by every caller and complicates parser composition; I'd prefer
those diagnostic details remain encapsulated.)
Replacing `Default` with `Option` is uglier, but it ends up producing the
same assembly as `mem::take` did, at least at the time of writing. Because
Rust is able to elide unnecessary moves using this implementation, there is
no need for `unwrap_unchecked` or other unsafe methods, which is great,
since it shows that this parsing methodology is viable entirely in safe
Rust.
DEV-7145
Previously, `ParseStatus::Dead` always yielded
`ParseState::Token`. However, I'm working on introducing parsers that
aggregate (parsing XML attributes into structs), and those parsers do not
know that they have completed aggregation until they reach a dead state;
given that, I need to yield additional information at that time.
I played around with a number of alternative ideas, but this ended up being
the cleanest, relative to the effort involved. For example, introducing
another parameter to `ParseStatus::Dead` was too burdensome on APIs that
ought not concern themselves with the possibility of receiving an object in
addition to a lookahead token, since many parsers are not capable of doing
so (given that they map M:(N<=M)).
Another option that I abandoned fairly quickly was having
`is_accepting` (potentially renamed) return an aggregate object, since
that's on the side and didn't feel like it was part of the parsing pipeline.
The intent is to abstract this some in a new `ParseState` method for
delegation + aggregation.
DEV-7145
I'll document it more formally eventually, but this settles on a mix of the
two: square brackets and dashes for intervals, `+` for intersecting lines,
byte offsets below interval endpoints, and names below that.
The docblock for `Span` itself iss still off; I'll probably just take one of
the test cases and paste it there at some point.
DEV-7145
This replaces a tuple with a tuple struct that allows for calculating more
complete span information, such as the span encompassing the entire
attribute and the value span including the surrounding quotes.
This includes logic that ought to be abstracted into `Span` itself, and it's
not as formal as I'd like it to be (e.g. not ensuring context), but this is
a good starting point.
Note that parsers call `Token::span`, which in turn calculates the attribute
span, each time an attribute is encountered during lowering. But Rust does
a good job at optimizing away unnecessary operations, so this didn't have an
observable impact on time.
DEV-7145
This provides much more clarity as to what is going on. Further, it's less
ambiguous, since I'm about to introduce a new type of xmlo lowering into XIR
for writing the actual xmlo files.
DEV-7145
This allows `XmlXirReader` to be used in a `Lower` operation, just as
everything else, bringing me one step closer to a pipeline that can be
concisely represented; this is finally beginning to unify in a clear way,
though it is still a bit of a mess.
This causes `XmlXirReader` to _act_ like a `parse::Parser` in that it yields
a `ParsedResult`, but it does not use `parse::Parser` itself; that was the
_original_ plan: convert it into a `ParseState` where `XmlXirReader` became
a context, and force `Parser` to yield by feeding it a stream of tokens with
`repeat`, but that ended up performing poorly relative to this change. I
did some investigation, which I might write about in the future, but for
now, this solution works just fine.
DEV-7145
This abstraction has grown quite a bit, and it's time to start formalizing
it a bit. This split doesn't change any behavior, but it does start to make
it easier to reason about by clearly stating the broad components and how
they interact with one-another.
This doesn't yet move the tests; those will come next, but they are very
few. The reason I gave previously for this was because (a) they're tested
indirectly via the systems that utilize them and (b) because the abstraction
was not yet settled on the process was already very expensive. No test
coverage was lost---it's only that failures were potentially harder to debug
on test failures, but in practice not even this was true, because the deeply
expressive types all but ensured that, if it compiles, it will function in a
way that is expected. Unit tests and documentation for this system will be
added once I'm sure that this abstraction is in a proper state.
DEV-7145
This also modifies `poc` such that `Lower` is invoked as an associated
function rather than a method to emphasize the pattern that is forming, so
that it can be later abstracted away.
DEV-11864
The `while_ok` can just be implied with a lowering operation, and that
reduces the name complexity so that we can maybe introduce even more
specialized methods without resulting in a huge sentence as a name.
DEV-11864
This finally uses `parse` all the way up to aggregation into the ASG, as can
be seen by the mess in `poc`. This will be further simplified---I just need
to get this committed so that I can mentally get it off my plate. I've been
separating this commit into smaller commits, but there's a point where it's
just not worth the effort anymore. I don't like making large changes such
as this one.
There is still work to do here. First, it's worth re-mentioning that
`poc` means "proof-of-concept", and represents things that still need a
proper home/abstraction.
Secondly, `poc` is retrieving the context of two parsers---`LowerContext`
and `Asg`. The latter is desirable, since it's the final aggregation point,
but the former needs to be eliminated; in particular, packages need to be
worked into the ASG so that `found` can be removed.
Recursively loading `xmlo` files still happens in `poc`, but the compiler
will need this as well. Once packages are on the ASG, along with their
state, that responsibility can be generalized as well.
That will then simplify lowering even further, to the point where hopefully
everything has the same shape (once final aggregation has an abstraction),
after which we can then create a final abstraction to concisely stitch
everything together. Right now, Rust isn't able to infer `S` for
`Lower<S, LS>`, which is unfortunate, but we'll be able to help it along
with a more explicit abstraction.
DEV-11864
This is intended to describe, to the user, the state that the parser is
in. This will be used to convey additional information for general parser
errors, but it should also probably be integrated into parsers' individual
errors as well when appropriate.
This is something I expected to add at some point, but I wanted to add them
because, when dealing with lowering errors, it can be difficult to tell
what parser the error originated from.
DEV-11864
Mike Gerwitz
Brandon Ellis