59 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
59 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
# Privacy In Light of the Petraeus Scandal
|
|
|
|
I'm not usually one for scandals (in fact, I couldn't care less who government
|
|
employees are sleeping with). However, it did bring up deep privacy
|
|
concerns---how exactly did the government get a hold of the e-mails?
|
|
|
|
The [EFF had released an article answering some questions][0] about the scandal,
|
|
which is worth a read. In particular, you should take a look at the [EFF's
|
|
Surveillance Self-Defense website][1] for an in-depth summary of the laws
|
|
surrounding government surveillance and tips on how to protect against it.
|
|
|
|
[0]: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/11/when-will-our-email-betray-us-email-privacy-primer-light-petraeus-saga
|
|
[1]: https://ssd.eff.org
|
|
|
|
I'd like to touch upon a couple things. In particular, [the article mentions][0]:
|
|
|
|
<!-- more -->
|
|
|
|
> Broadwell apparently accessed the emails from hotels and other locations, not
|
|
> her home. So the FBI cross-referenced the IP addresses of these Wi-Fi
|
|
> hotspots "against guest lists from other cities and hotels, looking for common
|
|
> names."
|
|
|
|
To stay anonymous in this situation, one should [consider using Tor][2] to mask
|
|
his/her IP address. Additionally, remove all cookies (or use your browser's
|
|
privacy mode if it will disable storing and sending of cookies for you) and
|
|
consider that your User Agent may be used to identify you, especially if
|
|
maleware has inserted its own unique identifiers.
|
|
|
|
Also according to [the EFF article][0]:
|
|
|
|
> According to reports, Patraeus and Broadwell adopted a technique of drafting
|
|
> emails, and reading them in the draft folder rather than sending them.
|
|
|
|
That didn't work out so well. Consider [encrypting important communications][3]
|
|
using GPG/PGP so that (a) the e-mail cannot be deciphered in transit and (b) the
|
|
e-mail can only be read by the intended recipient. Of course, you are then at
|
|
risk of being asked to divulge your password, so to avoid the situation
|
|
entirely, it would be best to delete the e-mails after reading them.
|
|
Additionally, if you host your own services, it may be wise to host your own
|
|
e-mail (guides for doing this vary between operating system, but consider
|
|
looking at software like [Postfix][4] for mail delivery and maybe [Dovecot][5]
|
|
for retrieval).
|
|
|
|
Privacy isn't only for those individuals who are trying to be sneaky or cheat on
|
|
their spouses. Feel free joining the EFF in trying to reform the ECPA to respect
|
|
our privacy in this modern era; storing a document digitally shouldn't change
|
|
its fundamental properties under the law.
|
|
|
|
I'd also encourage you to read [Schneier's post on this topic][6], which
|
|
summarizes points from many articles that I did not cover here.
|
|
|
|
[2]: https://ssd.eff.org/tech/tor
|
|
[3]: https://ssd.eff.org/tech/encryption
|
|
[4]: http://www.postfix.org
|
|
[5]: http://www.dovecot.org/
|
|
[6]: http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2012/11/e-mail_security.html
|
|
|