42 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
42 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
# LuLu Says Goodbye to DRM
|
||
|
||
On January 8th, [LuLu announced that they would be dropping DRM][0] for users
|
||
who "[download] eBooks directly from Lulu.com to the device of their choice".
|
||
This is a wise move (for [those of us who oppose DRM][1]), but unfortunately, as
|
||
John Sullivan of the Free Software Foundation noted on the fsf-community-team
|
||
mailing list, the [comments on LuLu's website][0] are not all positive:
|
||
|
||
[0]: http://www.lulu.com/blog/2013/01/drm-update/
|
||
[1]: http://defectivebydesign.org/
|
||
|
||
> This is a positive development, but unfortunately there has been a lot
|
||
> of negative reaction in the comments on their announcement.
|
||
>
|
||
> It'd be great if people could chime in and support them their move away
|
||
> from DRM.
|
||
|
||
<!-- more -->
|
||
|
||
At first glance, certain authors seem to be concerned that the absense of DRM
|
||
will lead to ["more illegal file sharing"][0]:
|
||
|
||
> [...] I’ve got copies of my non-DRM ebooks all over the torrent sites and
|
||
> thousands of downloads registered, for which I haven’t received a cent. As
|
||
> soon as you push for them to be taken down, they’re posted up again.
|
||
|
||
While it is unfortunate that those authors are not receiving compensation for
|
||
their hard work, it should be noted that this problem exists even *with*
|
||
DRM, so it is not a valid argument toward keeping it.
|
||
|
||
I applaud this move by LuLu, though I'm disappointed to see [this comment in the
|
||
original post][0]:
|
||
|
||
> Companies like Amazon, Apple and Barnes & Noble integrate a reader’s
|
||
> experience from purchasing to downloading and finally to reading. These
|
||
> companies do a fantastic job in this area, and eBooks published through Lulu
|
||
> and distributed through these retail sites will continue to have the same
|
||
> rights management applied as they do today.
|
||
|
||
They do not do it well; no DRM is good DRM.
|
||
|