62 lines
2.4 KiB
Plaintext
62 lines
2.4 KiB
Plaintext
|
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 20:47:00 -0400
|
||
|
|
From: Mike Gerwitz <mikegerwitz@gnu.org>
|
||
|
|
To: "[Name Removed] (GitHub Staff)" <support@github.com>
|
||
|
|
Subject: Re: Free GitHub's JavaScript
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Hey [Name Removed]; thank you for your reply.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 04:45:02PM -0700, [Name Removed] (GitHub Staff) wrote:
|
||
|
|
> Thanks for getting in touch with us here. Some of our internal projects
|
||
|
|
> are specific to running GitHub, and as such will probably remain closed.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Unfortunately, the code that I am referring to---the code that is served to
|
||
|
|
the client---is not internal; it runs on the user's web browser, just as any
|
||
|
|
other software. By visiting GitHub's website, users' web browsers download
|
||
|
|
and execute proprietary JavaScript.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
And much of this JavaScript performs fairly trivial tasks---tasks that could
|
||
|
|
conventionally be done without JavaScript:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
* Updating account/profile data;
|
||
|
|
* Sending pull requests;
|
||
|
|
* Forking, staring, and watching repositories;
|
||
|
|
* Changing repository/organization settings;
|
||
|
|
- Creating wiki pages;
|
||
|
|
- The issue tracking system; and more.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
I would consider the starred ones above to be the most essential features of
|
||
|
|
the website---it may be lacking, since I use GitHub with JavaScript
|
||
|
|
disabled---that users should be permitted to do without being required to
|
||
|
|
surrender their freedoms, especially on a website that should understand at
|
||
|
|
a deep level the fundamental need for those freedoms (even if GitHub's
|
||
|
|
philosophy does not coincide).
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
So my question is this: would GitHub consider:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
(a) Permitting those functions to work without JavaScript enabled; and
|
||
|
|
(b) Releasing the JavaScript---including any libraries used to perform
|
||
|
|
those tasks---under a free software license of GitHub's choice?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
These features would be a great start.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
> We do make an effort to open source projects that we create that we think
|
||
|
|
> would be beneficial to the community, some of which is JavaScript.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
And while I and many others do certainly appreciate that---some good free
|
||
|
|
software projects have come out of GitHub---these are things that are
|
||
|
|
*essential* to the community. Using GitHub's website with JavaScript enabled
|
||
|
|
is no different than using any other proprietary software and is therefore
|
||
|
|
very difficult for free software users to take full advantage of.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The free software community and myself would appreciate a strong
|
||
|
|
consideration on this topic.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Thank you,
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
--
|
||
|
|
Mike Gerwitz
|
||
|
|
Free Software Hacker | GNU Maintainer
|
||
|
|
http://mikegerwitz.com
|
||
|
|
FSF Member #5804 | GPG Key ID: 0x8EE30EAB
|