From 5f3e9aad1ca21a2ed0238c0db4c69c83a7599b77 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Gerwitz <gerwitzm@lovullo.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:31:59 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Comment to indicate that `f:thrushl' is not yet implemented

It will be; I just do not need it at this moment and want to get other
things moving.
---
 src/apply/thrush.xsl | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/apply/thrush.xsl b/src/apply/thrush.xsl
index 68e3233..e08ef2e 100644
--- a/src/apply/thrush.xsl
+++ b/src/apply/thrush.xsl
@@ -70,6 +70,8 @@
   Indeed, the syntax @code{A.B(C)} is just syntactic sugar for
   applying @code{B} within the context of @code{A}—@code{B(A,C)}—which
   can be done using @code{f:thrushl}.
+
+  @emph{@code{thrushl} is not yet implemented.}
 -->
 
 <stylesheet version="2.0"