Fragments' text were unescaped on reading, producing an owned String and
spending time parsing the text to unescape. We were then copying that into
an internement pool (so, copying twice, effectively).
Further, we were then _re-escaping_ on write.
This was all wasteful, since we do not do any manipulation of the fragment
before outputting to the xmle file; we know that Saxon produced properly
escaped XML to begin with, and can trust to propagate it.
This also introduces a new global `clone_uninterned_utf8_unchecked` method.
In profiling this change, I tested (a) before this change, (b) after writing
without escaping, and (c) after both reading escaped and writing without
escaping.
(a) (b) (c)
sec mem (B) sec B sec B
0:00.95 47896 -> 0:00.91 47988 -> 0:00.87 48288
0:00.40 30176 -> 0:00.37 25656 -> 0:00.36 25788
0:00.39 45672 -> 0:00.37 45756 -> 0:00.35 34952
0:00.39 20716 -> 0:00.38 19604 -> 0:00.36 19956
0:00.33 16836 -> 0:00.32 16988 -> 0:00.31 16892
0:00.23 15268 -> 0:00.23 15236 -> 0:00.22 15312
0:00.44 20780 -> 0:00.44 20048 -> 0:00.41 20148
0:00.54 44516 -> 0:00.50 36964 -> 0:00.49 36728
0:00.62 55976 -> 0:00.57 46204 -> 0:00.54 41468
0:00.31 28016 -> 0:00.30 27308 -> 0:00.28 23844
0:00.23 15388 -> 0:00.22 15316 -> 0:00.21 15304
0:00.05 4888 -> 0:00.05 4760 -> 0:00.05 4948
0:00.41 19756 -> 0:00.41 19852 -> 0:00.40 19992
0:00.47 20828 -> 0:00.46 20844 -> 0:00.44 20968
0:00.27 18152 -> 0:00.26 18184 -> 0:00.25 18312
Interestingly, the peak memory usage increases very slightly between the
second and third steps (though decreases from the first), likely because the
raw (encoded) is larger than the unencoded text (e.g. `>` takes more
space than `>`).
Mike Gerwitz
1cdb3fbbc5