This change requires every package to have a canonical name, and performs
namespec canonicalization on imports.
Since all package names are canonicalized, this opens the door to being able
to index package names at import, allowing the object to be shared on the
graph and properly reference a package after it has been resolved.
Note that the system tests' canonicalization is relative to the hard-coded
`/TODO` presently; that will change in the near future once `tamec`
generates names from the provided path.
DEV-13162
NOTE: This temporarily breaks `tameld`. It is fixed in a future commit when
names are bound. This was an oversight when breaking apart changes into
separate commits, because the linker does not yet have system tests like
tamec does.
This is preparing for a full transition to requiring a canonical package
name. The previous `Unnamed` variant has been removed and `AirAggregate`
will provide a default `WS_EMPTY` name, as `Pkg` had done before.
The intent of this change is to allow for consulting the index before a
new `Pkg` object is created on the graph, but we're not quite ready for that
yet.
Well, that's not entirely true---the linker can be ready for that. But the
compiler needs to canonicalize import paths relative to the active package
canonical name, which it can't even do yet because tamec isn't generating a
name.
So maybe the linker will be first; it's useful to have that in a separate
commit anyway to emphasize the change.
DEV-13162
tameld isn't yet adding edges to Idents from their associated Pkg (see
previous commit), but this formalizes how the ontology will interpret such a
relationship. The idea is that Idents are always owned by Pkgs, but they
may be optionally explicitly rooted, which will be used by a particular type
of DFS walk that is about to be written, which can ignore Root->Pkg and
focus instead on cross edges to Idents.
Though it's not lost on me that now that I'll be introducing a DFS for the
linker, the terms "cross" and "tree" edge now become ambiguous; I used to
call them "ontological X edge", but I had fallen out of that habit; perhaps
I need to reintroduce that rigor.
DEV-13162
Historically, the ASG was better described as a "dependency graph",
containing only identifiers (which are simply called "symbols" in the
XSLT-based compiler). Consequently, it was appropriate for the graph to
have operations specific to identifiers. (Indeed, that's the only type of
object the graph supported.)
Much has changed since then. This cleans things up, and makes parenting
identifiers to root an _explicit_ operation. This will make it easier to
move forward with handling of scope, and importing identifiers into
packages, and removing `Source`, and so on.
DEV-13162
These are used by virtually every `ObjectKind`; I've been meaning to do this
for a while, but now that I'm about to introduce a new one (`Doc`), let's
just get it out of the way.
DEV-13708
This creates another trait and struct `ObjectIndexToTree` that assert a
stronger invariant than `ObjectIndexRelTo`---that not only does it uphold
the invariants of `ObjectIndexRelTo`, but also that it represents a _tree_
edge, which indicates _ownership_ rather than just a reference.
This will be used to statically infer what can serve as a scope boundary for
upcoming changes. Specifically, anything that can own an `Ident` introduces
a new level of scope.
DEV-13708
The previous commit demonstrated the amount of boilerplate necessary for
introducing new `ObjectKind`s; this abstracts away a lot of that
boilerplate, and allows for declarative relationship definition for the
ASG's ontology.
DEV-13708
There's quite a bit of boilerplate here that'll eventually need factoring
out. But it's also clear that it is somewhat onerous to add new object
types.
Note that a good chunk of this burden is _intentional_, via exhaustiveness
checks---adding a new type of object is an exceptional occurrence (well, in
principle, but we haven't added them all yet, so it'll be more common
initially), and we'd rather be safe to ensure that everything is properly
considering how that new type of object interacts with it.
Let's not confuse coupling with safety---the latter causes a burden because
of the former, not because of itself; it provides a service to us.
But, nonetheless, we'll want to reduce this burden somewhat since there are
a number more to add.
DEV-13708
This introduces the concept of ontological cross edges.
The term "cross edge" is most often seen in the context of graph traversals,
e.g. the trees formed by a depth-first search. This, however, refers to the
trees that are inherent in the ontology of the graph.
For example, an `ExprRef` will produce a cross edge to the referenced
`Ident`, that that is a different tree than the current expression. (Well,
I suppose technically it _could_ be a back edge, but then that'd be a cycle
which would fail the process once we get to preventing it. So let's ignore
that for now.)
DEV-13708
This causes a package definition to be rooted (so that it can be easily
accessed for a graph walk). This keeps consistent with the new
`ObjectIndex`-based API by introducing a unit `Root` `ObjectKind` and the
boilerplate that goes with it.
This boilerplate, now glaringly obvious, will be refactored at some point,
since its repetition is onerous and distracting.
DEV-13159
Mike Gerwitz