This has been a long time coming, and has been repeatedly stashed as other
parts of the system have evolved to support it. The introduction of the XIR
tree was to write tests for this (which are sloppy atm).
This currently writes out the `xmle` header and _most_ of the `l:dep`
section; it's missing the object-type-specific attributes. There is,
relatively speaking, not much more work to do here.
The feature flag `wip-xir-xmle-writer` was introduced to toggle this system
in place of `XmleWriter`. Initial benchmarks show that it will be
competitive with the quick-xml-based writer, but remember that is not the
goal: the purpose of this is to test XIR in a production system before we
continue to implement it for a frontend, and to refactor so that we do not
have multiple implementations writing XML files (once we echo the source XML
files).
I'm excited to get this done with so that I can move on. This has been
rather exhausting.
The 16-bit interner at present will be used only for span contexts. In the
future, this interner may become specialized specifically for that, but for
now let's just re-use what we already have so that I can move on.
DEV-10733
I want to make it clear in the assertion that the problem could be caused by
duplicate strings. We do not sort by string, because in part we may in the
future want to group certain symbols together in some arbitrary way so we
can compare ranges (using the markers).
If that doesn't end up happening, it may be better to just sort by string
to obviate the problem.
It's really awkward not having them caps, when not only are constants
expected to be, but also that we cannot maintain consistency between the
string and the identifier name in even the simplest of cases.
(We could use `r#`, but that's too cumbersome.)
`StaticSymbolId` was created before the more specific types, which render it
unnecessary. If we need a generic type, it can be re-introduced, but using
`static_symbol_newtypes!`.
This is the interner that is intended to be used with the majority of the
system; the 16-bit interner is left around for the moment, but will likely
later become specialized.
This had the writing on the wall all the same as the `'i` interner lifetime
that came before it. It was too much of a maintenance burden trying to
accommodate both 16-bit and 32-bit symbols generically.
There is a situation where we do still want 16-bit symbols---the
`Span`. Therefore, I have left generic support for symbol sizes, as well as
the different global interners, but `SymbolId` now defaults to 32-bit, as
does `Asg`. Further, the size parameter has been removed from the rest of
the code, with the exception of `Span`.
This cleans things up quite a bit, and is much nicer to work with. If we
want 16-bit symbols in the future for packing to increase CPU cache
performance, we can handle that situation then in that specific case; it's a
premature optimization that's not at all worth the effort here.
We'll see how the syntax evolves over time. It's not ideal to have to
specify the type, rather than having the compiler infer it, but I don't much
feel like getting into my first procedural macro right now, so we'll stick
with this approach for the time being.
This will set the stage to be able to safely e.g. create QNames statically
at compile-time and would allow us to make any attempts to bypass it
unsafe.
Previously, we were allocating only u32 versions of `SymbolId` for the
statically allocated symbols. This introduces a new symbol type with a very
small datatype (8 bits) that is able to cast into any `SymbolId`. This is
explained in the docs.
We'll be taking this typing further in future commits so that static symbols
are better-suited for compile-time guarantees for static newtype
construction.
DEV-10710
This is the beginning of static symbols, which is becoming increasing
necessary as it's quite a pain to have to deal with interning static strings
any place they're used.
It's _more_ of a pain to do that in conjunction with newtypes (e.g. `QName`,
`AttValue`, etc) that make use of `SymbolId`; this will allow us to
construct _those_ statically as well, and additional work to support that
will be coming up.
DEV-10701
These were using GiB of memory, which is ...unnecessary.
I reduced the iteration count significantly, but it was still wasting a lot
of time and memory and needed `with_capacity` to reduce the number of copies
after reallocation.
It is not typical that a buffer would contain this much information.
This broke when I removed `SelfClose`. I used to run
`make all fmt check bench` before every push, but they take a while to run,
in part because it uses nightly and has to recompile too.
But it looks like I need to be more diligent again.
This is exactly was I said I was _not_ going to do in the previous commit,
but apparently hacking late at night had me forget the whole reason that
XIRT is being introduced now---unit tests. I'll be emitting a XIR stream
and I need to parse it for convenience in the tests.
So, here's a good start. Next will be some generalizations that are useful
for the tests as well. This is pretty bare, but accomplishes the task.
See docs for more info.
The `tree` module is getting more difficult to navigate. The tests still
remain where they were, since a bunch of concerns are mixed together. Any
tests specific only to this module will be added here.
This is implemented only for the writer, since its use case is to be able to
concatenate strings without copying during writing.
It doesn't really make sense to support this in XIR Tree, since a reader
should never produce this. But if we ever run into this (e.g. due to some
internal processing pipeline), we'll address it then; XIR Tree might have to
do copying, then, but should probably wait until encountering all fragments
before interning. That'd be a distraction right now.
This commit will make more sense once the broader context is committed, but
it's needed for lowering from `Sections` into a XIR stream.
This will also change once we pre-allocate symbols, like rustc, when the
interner is initialized.
This is my first use of the `paste` crate, which is used to generate
identifiers. So this is partly an experiment, and it seems much better than
having to write a proc macro, at least at this point in time. If this code
stays around, it'll probably be generalized further and used elsewhere, but
I'd prefer not to go this route long-term.
This moves some logic into `ElementStack` (which would be part of `Stack` if
variants were their own types), rather than peering so deeply into its
data.
This correctly retains and restores the parent stack after processing an
attribute for a child element.
This does increase the size of [`Stack`] a bit, but we can evaluate whether
it's too large at a later time. It's currently 832 bits with `Ix=u32`,
which is large, but the question is whether it matters; we'll see as we
begin to use it.
This moves most of the parsing logic into `Stack`, which rightfully owns the
stack manipulation and state transitions. `ParserState` becomes exactly
what it says it is---a management of the persistent state of the parser, and
is also responsible for digesting tokens and dispatching their data to the
proper event.
This approach has a number of benefits over the old design: it's
self-documenting, making the intent clear; and it is easier to reason about
the subset of states (for both humans and Rusts) than a large match of
transitions.
This contains a number of TODO items that will be addressed shortly. It
also obviated that the previous commit was incomplete---it doesn't persist
`pstack` for attributes on child elements! That'll be fixed too.
This modifies the tree parser to handle child elements. It's mostly
proof-of-concept code; the next commit will clean it up a bit so that it's
largely self-documenting.
This removes `SelfClose` and merges it with `Close` by making the first
parameter an `Option`. This isn't really ideal, but it really simplifies
pattern matching, especially for the next commit. I'll have more details
there.
The primary motivation was lack of stabalization for binding after `@` in
matches, e.g. `Foo(name, ele) | ele @ Element { name, .. }`. It looks like
it's ready, though; maybe next Rust release?
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65490
I don't know if I'll revert this change after then. This seems plenty
clear, albeit more verbose.
This introduces parser errors, but does not yet support error recovery; that
problem will be discussed in a commit in the near future, after the writer
is sorted out a bit more.
DEV-10561
The idea, previously, was that parsing could begin at attributes selectively
and be parsed independently. But that's really awkward with `Tree`, since
it effectively allows orphan attributes as children of an
`Element`. Nonsense.
Instead, if we truly only want an attribute list, we can offer a function to
create a parser with an empty `Stack::BuddingElement` that can accumulate
them.
Previously, `parser_from` was a simple wrapper around `parse`; now, this
provides a more convenient API where `next` will yield the next parsed
object.
See docs for much more information and rationale.
These traits are intended to eliminate boilerplate, primarily in tests, in
situations where from/into is not expected to fail.
Given that TAMER must only panic for internal compiler errors, this should
not often be used outside of test cases. Further, there may be better
options in the future (e.g. QNames could be statically compiled rather than
trying to convert at runtime, in this case).
This begins to introduce the XIR tree. I was originally going to wait on
this until after implementing the xmle writer in terms of XIR, but writing
unit tests is too much of a pain on the stream, so now is as good of a time
as any.
This has very limited support so far; it'll be added to as time goes on.
These groups happen to correspond with the sections of the xmle file, which
suggests again that this lives in the wrong place. But I should really have
my focus elsewhere right now, so I don't know if I'll go any further right
now. I guess we'll see as the writer is reimplemented.
`SectionsIter` was introduced to remove that responsibility from xmle
writer, since that's currently being reimplemented using XIR.
The existing iterator has been renamed SectionIter{ator=>} for a more
idiomatic name for iterator structs, and now has a static type rather than
relying on dynamic dispatch. The author of that code wasn't sure how to
handle it otherwise. (Which is understandable, since we were both still
getting acquainted with Rust.) There's no notable change in performance in
my benchmarking.
This abstraction is a bit awkward, in that it's named for object file
sections, but they aren't. Further, it's coupled with the ASG via
`SortableAsg` and perhaps should be generalized into a sorting routine that
takes a function for sorting, so that `Sections` can be moved into xmle's
packages.
This macro is used to consume whitespace so that the following sentence can
start on the next line without producing any whitespace in the output. Its
argument is, therefore, whitespace.
This used to work in earlier versions of Texinfo, but around 6.{6,7} it
began failing because an argument was provided when it wasn't defined with
one.
The return value has no meaningful side-effects at all; the write operation
failing isn't worth pointing out, since it has to be used regardless.
The normal `write` does have useful side-effects, of course.
This change was primarily intended to clean up unit tests. Since it
allocates and returns a new buffer, I do not expect this to have much use
within TAMER itself in the near future. Maybe in later tooling.
If this is abused, person from the future: add `#[cfg(test)]` to its
definition.
I decided not to do this in a previous commit because I had documented
"NodeStream" elsewhere, so I'd like it to be in the Git history to
understand its evolution.
This never was a "Node" stream beyond the initial concept phase, because it
represents tokens that aren't themselves nodes. It is intended to generate
XML nodes, but may need to accommodate non-nodes (e.g. XML declarations) in
the future.
The name originated from `Node`, which was a tree-based IR that was
initially conceived, but removed because it's not yet needed. What we need
is a streaming IR for xmle writing, and then for reading and echoing back
out XML for the new frontend.
This is a working streaming IR for XML. I want to get this committed before
I go further cleaning it up and integrating it into the xmle writer.
This is lacking detailed documentation, and the names of things may end up
changing.
Initial benchmarks do show that it has a ~2x performance improvement over
quick-xml when dealing with two attributes on a node, and I suspect that
improvement will increase with the number of attributes. We will see how it
compares in real-world benchmarks once the linker has been modified to use
it.
The goal isn't to _avoid_ quick-xml---it'll be used in the future for things
like escaping that would be a huge waste to implement ourselves. It just so
happened that quick-xml was not beneficial for these changes; indeed, its
own writer is fairly simple for the portions that were implemented here, so
there's no use in fighting with its API, particularly around attributes and
our need to explicitly control whitespace (with the intent of handling code
formatters in the future).
To put this into perspective: the reason this work is being done isn't to
refactor the linker, or to speed it up, but to generalize XML writing and
provide a suitable IR for use in the compiler. The first step of the
frontend is to essentially echo the XML token stream back out so we can
incrementally parse it and do something useful, to incrementally rewrite the
compiler in Rust.
This adds benchmarking for the memchr crate. It is used primarily by
quick-xml at the moment, but the question is whether to rely on it for
certain operations for XIR.
The benchmarking on an Intel Xeon system shows that memchr and Rust's
contains() perform very similarly on small inputs, matching against a single
character, and so Rust's built-in should be preferred in that case so that
we're using APIs that are familiar to most people.
When larger inputs are compared against, there's a greater benefit (a little
under ~2x).
When comparing against two characters, they are again very close. But look
at when we compare two characters against _multiple_ inputs:
running 24 tests
test large_str:1️⃣:memchr_early_match ... bench: 4,938 ns/iter (+/- 124)
test large_str:1️⃣:memchr_late_match ... bench: 81,807 ns/iter (+/- 1,153)
test large_str:1️⃣:memchr_non_match ... bench: 82,074 ns/iter (+/- 1,062)
test large_str:1️⃣:rust_contains_one_byte_early_match ... bench: 9,425 ns/iter (+/- 167)
test large_str:1️⃣:rust_contains_one_byte_late_match ... bench: 123,685 ns/iter (+/- 3,728)
test large_str:1️⃣:rust_contains_one_byte_non_match ... bench: 123,117 ns/iter (+/- 2,200)
test large_str:1️⃣:rust_contains_one_char_early_match ... bench: 9,561 ns/iter (+/- 507)
test large_str:1️⃣:rust_contains_one_char_late_match ... bench: 123,929 ns/iter (+/- 2,377)
test large_str:1️⃣:rust_contains_one_char_non_match ... bench: 122,989 ns/iter (+/- 2,788)
test large_str:2️⃣:memchr2_early_match ... bench: 5,704 ns/iter (+/- 91)
test large_str:2️⃣:memchr2_late_match ... bench: 89,194 ns/iter (+/- 8,546)
test large_str:2️⃣:memchr2_non_match ... bench: 85,649 ns/iter (+/- 3,879)
test large_str:2️⃣:rust_contains_two_char_early_match ... bench: 66,785 ns/iter (+/- 3,385)
test large_str:2️⃣:rust_contains_two_char_late_match ... bench: 2,148,064 ns/iter (+/- 21,812)
test large_str:2️⃣:rust_contains_two_char_non_match ... bench: 2,322,082 ns/iter (+/- 22,947)
test small_str:1️⃣:memchr_mid_match ... bench: 4,737 ns/iter (+/- 842)
test small_str:1️⃣:memchr_non_match ... bench: 5,160 ns/iter (+/- 62)
test small_str:1️⃣:rust_contains_one_byte_non_match ... bench: 3,930 ns/iter (+/- 35)
test small_str:1️⃣:rust_contains_one_char_mid_match ... bench: 3,677 ns/iter (+/- 618)
test small_str:1️⃣:rust_contains_one_char_non_match ... bench: 5,415 ns/iter (+/- 221)
test small_str:2️⃣:memchr2_mid_match ... bench: 5,488 ns/iter (+/- 888)
test small_str:2️⃣:memchr2_non_match ... bench: 6,788 ns/iter (+/- 134)
test small_str:2️⃣:rust_contains_two_char_mid_match ... bench: 6,203 ns/iter (+/- 170)
test small_str:2️⃣:rust_contains_two_char_non_match ... bench: 7,853 ns/iter (+/- 713)
Yikes.
With that said, we won't be comparing against such large inputs
short-term. The larger strings (fragments) are copied verbatim, and not
compared against---but they _were_ prior to the previous commit that stopped
unencoding and re-encoding.
So: Rust built-ins for inputs that are expected to be small.
Fragments' text were unescaped on reading, producing an owned String and
spending time parsing the text to unescape. We were then copying that into
an internement pool (so, copying twice, effectively).
Further, we were then _re-escaping_ on write.
This was all wasteful, since we do not do any manipulation of the fragment
before outputting to the xmle file; we know that Saxon produced properly
escaped XML to begin with, and can trust to propagate it.
This also introduces a new global `clone_uninterned_utf8_unchecked` method.
In profiling this change, I tested (a) before this change, (b) after writing
without escaping, and (c) after both reading escaped and writing without
escaping.
(a) (b) (c)
sec mem (B) sec B sec B
0:00.95 47896 -> 0:00.91 47988 -> 0:00.87 48288
0:00.40 30176 -> 0:00.37 25656 -> 0:00.36 25788
0:00.39 45672 -> 0:00.37 45756 -> 0:00.35 34952
0:00.39 20716 -> 0:00.38 19604 -> 0:00.36 19956
0:00.33 16836 -> 0:00.32 16988 -> 0:00.31 16892
0:00.23 15268 -> 0:00.23 15236 -> 0:00.22 15312
0:00.44 20780 -> 0:00.44 20048 -> 0:00.41 20148
0:00.54 44516 -> 0:00.50 36964 -> 0:00.49 36728
0:00.62 55976 -> 0:00.57 46204 -> 0:00.54 41468
0:00.31 28016 -> 0:00.30 27308 -> 0:00.28 23844
0:00.23 15388 -> 0:00.22 15316 -> 0:00.21 15304
0:00.05 4888 -> 0:00.05 4760 -> 0:00.05 4948
0:00.41 19756 -> 0:00.41 19852 -> 0:00.40 19992
0:00.47 20828 -> 0:00.46 20844 -> 0:00.44 20968
0:00.27 18152 -> 0:00.26 18184 -> 0:00.25 18312
Interestingly, the peak memory usage increases very slightly between the
second and third steps (though decreases from the first), likely because the
raw (encoded) is larger than the unencoded text (e.g. `>` takes more
space than `>`).
Fragments were previously represented by `String` to avoid the cost of
interning (hashing and copying). This change modifies it to use uninterned
symbols, which does still have a copy overhead but it does not hash.
Initial tests shows a small performance decrease of about 15% and a small
memory increase of similar proportion. However, once I realized that I was
not clearing buffers from quick_xml events and implemented that change in a
previous commit, this change ended up being approximately on par with
`String`, despite the copying of some pretty large fragments.
YMMV, though, and perhaps on less powerful systems time may increase
slightly.
The upcoming XIR (XML IR) was originally going to support both owned strings
and symbols, but now we'll just use uninterned symbols; I can't rationalize
complicating the API at this time when it will provide an almost
imperceivable performance benefit. If ever that changes in the future,
that change will be entertained.
The end result is that the fate of a fragment's underlying memory is
determined by whatever is processing the data, _not_ by the API itself---the
API was previously forcing use of a String, whereas now it's up to the
caller to determine whether we want comparable interns. For fragments,
that's not likely ever to be the case, especially considering that the
representation will change so drastically in the future.
This clears the buffers used by quick_xml, which was apparently forgotten
during initial development (I think I expected it to re-use the previously
allocated space automatically).
This has significant effects in some cases. For example, one of our UI
builds drops from ~9KiB to ~5KiB peak memory usage. Other builds for larger
suppliers are only slightly effected because of some of their massive
fragments.
This adds support for uninterned symbols. This came about as I was creating
Xir (not yet committed) where I had to decide if I wanted `SymbolId` for all
values, even though some values (e.g. large text blocks like compiled code
fragments for xmle files) will never be compared, and so would be wastefull
hashed.
Previous IRs used `String`, but that was clumsy; see documentation in this
commit for rationale.
Mike Gerwitz