design/tpl: Corrected conjunction/disjunction index placement
They were incorrectly placed at the quantifiers.master
parent
cb9ccfe5f3
commit
dfb013ca74
|
@ -37,10 +37,14 @@ We use $\implies$ in place of $\rightarrow$ for implication,
|
|||
We further use $\equiv$ in place of $\leftrightarrow$ to represent material
|
||||
equivalence.
|
||||
|
||||
\indexsym\logand{conjunction}
|
||||
\index{conjunction (\ensuremath{\logand})}
|
||||
\begin{definition}[Logical Conjunction]
|
||||
$p,q \infer (p\logand q)$.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
|
||||
\indexsym\logor{disjunction}
|
||||
\index{disjunction (\ensuremath{\logor})}
|
||||
\begin{definition}[Logical Disjunction]
|
||||
$p \infer (p\logor q)$ and $q \infer (p\logor q)$.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue