design/tpl: Reposition disjunctive classification footnote
The original position made it look to much like d^2.master
parent
6dc0ca2454
commit
51c87f9938
|
@ -94,16 +94,16 @@ is equivalent to the proposition
|
|||
|
||||
\index{classification!disjunctive}
|
||||
\begin{definition}[\logor-Classification]\dfnlabel{classe}
|
||||
A disjunctive classification~$d$\footnote{%
|
||||
It is notationally convenient that~$c$ is a common prefix for both
|
||||
\underline{c}lassification \emph{and} \underline{c}onjunction,
|
||||
and also that~$d$ happens to follow~$c$ \emph{and} be the prefix for
|
||||
\underline{d}isjunction.
|
||||
This notation will only be used where such a distinction is relevant,
|
||||
and $c$~will otherwise refer generically to any type of
|
||||
classification.}
|
||||
with the attribute \xpath{@any="true"} performs disjunction on its match
|
||||
expressions $M_0\ldots M_n$.
|
||||
A disjunctive classification~$d$ with \xpath{@any="true"}
|
||||
performs disjunction on its match expressions
|
||||
$M_0\ldots M_n$.\footnote{%
|
||||
It is notationally convenient that~$c$ is a common prefix for both
|
||||
\underline{c}lassification \emph{and} \underline{c}onjunction,
|
||||
and also that~$d$ happens to follow~$c$ \emph{and} be the prefix for
|
||||
\underline{d}isjunction.
|
||||
This notation will only be used where such a distinction is relevant,
|
||||
and $c$~will otherwise refer generically to any type of
|
||||
classification.}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{alignat*}{2}
|
||||
&\xml{<classify as="} &&d\xml{" any="true" desc="$\ldots$">} \\
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue