tame/tamer/src/parse.rs

659 lines
19 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

// Basic streaming parsing framework
tamer: xir:tree: Begin work on composable XIRT parser The XIRT parser was initially written for test cases, so that unit tests should assert more easily on generated token streams (XIR). While it was planned, it wasn't clear what the eventual needs would be, which were expected to differ. Indeed, loading everything into a generic tree representation in memory is not appropriate---we should prefer streaming and avoiding heap allocations when they’re not necessary, and we should parse into an IR rather than a generic format, which ensures that the data follow a proper grammar and are semantically valid. When parsing attributes in an isolated context became necessary for the aforementioned task, the state machine of the XIRT parser was modified to accommodate. The opposite approach should have been taken---instead of adding complexity and special cases to the parser, and from a complex parser extracting a simple one (an attribute parser), we should be composing the larger (full XIRT) parser from smaller ones (e.g. attribute, child elements). A combinator, when used in a functional sense, refers not to combinatory logic but to the composition of more complex systems from smaller ones. The changes made as part of this commit begin to work toward combinators, though it's not necessarily evident yet (to you, the reader) how that'll work, since the code for it hasn't yet been written; this is commit is simply getting my work thusfar introduced so I can do some light refactoring before continuing on it. TAMER does not aim to introduce a parser combinator framework in its usual sense---it favors, instead, striking a proper balance with Rust’s type system that permits the convenience of combinators only in situations where they are needed, to avoid having to write new parser boilerplate. Specifically: 1. Rust’s type system should be used as combinators, so that parsers are automatically constructed from the type definition. 2. Primitive parsers are written as explicit automata, not as primitive combinators. 3. Parsing should directly produce IRs as a lowering operation below XIRT, rather than producing XIRT itself. That is, target IRs should consume XIRT and produce parse themselves immediately, during streaming. In the future, if more combinators are needed, they will be added; maybe this will eventually evolve into a more generic parser combinator framework for TAME, but that is certainly a waste of time right now. And, to be honest, I’m hoping that won’t be necessary.
2021-12-06 11:26:53 -05:00
//
// Copyright (C) 2014-2023 Ryan Specialty, LLC.
tamer: xir:tree: Begin work on composable XIRT parser The XIRT parser was initially written for test cases, so that unit tests should assert more easily on generated token streams (XIR). While it was planned, it wasn't clear what the eventual needs would be, which were expected to differ. Indeed, loading everything into a generic tree representation in memory is not appropriate---we should prefer streaming and avoiding heap allocations when they’re not necessary, and we should parse into an IR rather than a generic format, which ensures that the data follow a proper grammar and are semantically valid. When parsing attributes in an isolated context became necessary for the aforementioned task, the state machine of the XIRT parser was modified to accommodate. The opposite approach should have been taken---instead of adding complexity and special cases to the parser, and from a complex parser extracting a simple one (an attribute parser), we should be composing the larger (full XIRT) parser from smaller ones (e.g. attribute, child elements). A combinator, when used in a functional sense, refers not to combinatory logic but to the composition of more complex systems from smaller ones. The changes made as part of this commit begin to work toward combinators, though it's not necessarily evident yet (to you, the reader) how that'll work, since the code for it hasn't yet been written; this is commit is simply getting my work thusfar introduced so I can do some light refactoring before continuing on it. TAMER does not aim to introduce a parser combinator framework in its usual sense---it favors, instead, striking a proper balance with Rust’s type system that permits the convenience of combinators only in situations where they are needed, to avoid having to write new parser boilerplate. Specifically: 1. Rust’s type system should be used as combinators, so that parsers are automatically constructed from the type definition. 2. Primitive parsers are written as explicit automata, not as primitive combinators. 3. Parsing should directly produce IRs as a lowering operation below XIRT, rather than producing XIRT itself. That is, target IRs should consume XIRT and produce parse themselves immediately, during streaming. In the future, if more combinators are needed, they will be added; maybe this will eventually evolve into a more generic parser combinator framework for TAME, but that is certainly a waste of time right now. And, to be honest, I’m hoping that won’t be necessary.
2021-12-06 11:26:53 -05:00
//
// This file is part of TAME.
//
// This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
// it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
// the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
// (at your option) any later version.
//
// This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
// but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
// MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
// GNU General Public License for more details.
//
// You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
// along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
//! Basic streaming parser framework for lowering operations.
//!
//! _TODO: Some proper docs and examples!_
tamer: xir:tree: Begin work on composable XIRT parser The XIRT parser was initially written for test cases, so that unit tests should assert more easily on generated token streams (XIR). While it was planned, it wasn't clear what the eventual needs would be, which were expected to differ. Indeed, loading everything into a generic tree representation in memory is not appropriate---we should prefer streaming and avoiding heap allocations when they’re not necessary, and we should parse into an IR rather than a generic format, which ensures that the data follow a proper grammar and are semantically valid. When parsing attributes in an isolated context became necessary for the aforementioned task, the state machine of the XIRT parser was modified to accommodate. The opposite approach should have been taken---instead of adding complexity and special cases to the parser, and from a complex parser extracting a simple one (an attribute parser), we should be composing the larger (full XIRT) parser from smaller ones (e.g. attribute, child elements). A combinator, when used in a functional sense, refers not to combinatory logic but to the composition of more complex systems from smaller ones. The changes made as part of this commit begin to work toward combinators, though it's not necessarily evident yet (to you, the reader) how that'll work, since the code for it hasn't yet been written; this is commit is simply getting my work thusfar introduced so I can do some light refactoring before continuing on it. TAMER does not aim to introduce a parser combinator framework in its usual sense---it favors, instead, striking a proper balance with Rust’s type system that permits the convenience of combinators only in situations where they are needed, to avoid having to write new parser boilerplate. Specifically: 1. Rust’s type system should be used as combinators, so that parsers are automatically constructed from the type definition. 2. Primitive parsers are written as explicit automata, not as primitive combinators. 3. Parsing should directly produce IRs as a lowering operation below XIRT, rather than producing XIRT itself. That is, target IRs should consume XIRT and produce parse themselves immediately, during streaming. In the future, if more combinators are needed, they will be added; maybe this will eventually evolve into a more generic parser combinator framework for TAME, but that is certainly a waste of time right now. And, to be honest, I’m hoping that won’t be necessary.
2021-12-06 11:26:53 -05:00
mod error;
mod lower;
mod parser;
mod state;
mod trace;
tamer: nir::desugar::interp: Generalize without NIR symbol types This is a shift in approach. My original idea was to try to keep NIR parsing the way it was, since it's already hard enough to reason about with the `ele_parse!` parser-generator macro mess. The idea was to produce an IR that would explicitly be denoted as "maybe sugared", and have a desugaring operation as part of the lowering pipeline that would perform interpolation and lower the symbol into a plain version. The problem with that is: 1. The use of the type was going to introduce a lot of mapping for all the NIR token variants there are going to be; and 2. _The types weren't even utilized for interpolation._ Instead, if we interpolated _as attributes are encountered_ while parsing NIR, then we'd be able to expand directly into that NIR token stream and handle _all_ symbols in a generic way, without any mapping beyond the definition of NIR's grammar using `ele_parse!`. This is a step in that direction---it removes `NirSymbolTy` and introduces a generic abstraction for the concept of expansion, which will be utilized soon by the attribute parser to allow replacing `TryFrom` with something akin to `ParseFrom`, or something like that, which is able to produce a token stream before finally yielding the value of the attribute (which will be either the original symbol or the replacement metavariable, in the case of interpolation). (Note that interpolation isn't yet finished---errors still need to be implemented. But I want a working vertical slice first.) DEV-13156
2022-11-10 12:14:56 -05:00
pub mod util;
pub use error::{FinalizeError, ParseError};
pub use lower::{
lowerable, terminal, FromParseError, Lower, LowerIter, LowerSource,
ParsedObject,
};
pub use parser::{FinalizedParser, Parsed, ParsedResult, Parser};
pub use state::{
context::{Context, Empty as EmptyContext, NoContext},
ClosedParseState, ParseResult, ParseState, ParseStatus, StateStack,
Transition, TransitionResult, Transitionable,
};
use crate::span::{Span, UNKNOWN_SPAN};
use std::{
error::Error,
fmt::{Debug, Display},
};
/// Prelude for TAME's parsing framework.
///
/// This contains the boilerplate types necessary for virtually every
/// parser.
pub mod prelude {
pub use super::{
util::SPair, ClosedParseState, Context, NoContext, Object, ParseError,
ParseState, ParseStatus, Parsed, ParsedResult, Token, Transition,
TransitionResult, Transitionable,
};
// Every `Token` must implement `Display`.
pub use std::fmt::Display;
}
/// A single datum from a streaming IR with an associated [`Span`].
///
/// A token may be a lexeme with associated data,
/// or a more structured object having been lowered from other IRs.
pub trait Token: Display + Debug + PartialEq {
tamer: parser::Parser: cfg(test) tracing This produces useful parse traces that are output as part of a failing test case. The parser generator macros can be a bit confusing to deal with when things go wrong, so this helps to clarify matters. This is _not_ intended to be machine-readable, but it does show that it would be possible to generate machine-readable output to visualize the entire lowering pipeline. Perhaps something for the future. I left these inline in Parser::feed_tok because they help to elucidate what is going on, just by reading what the trace would output---that is, it helps to make the method more self-documenting, albeit a tad bit more verbose. But with that said, it should probably be extracted at some point; I don't want this to set a precedent where composition is feasible. Here's an example from test cases: [Parser::feed_tok] (input IR: XIRF) | ==> Parser before tok is parsing attributes for `package`. | | Attrs_(SutAttrsState_ { ___ctx: (QName(None, LocalPart(NCName(SymbolId(46 "package")))), OpenSpan(Span { len: 0, offset: 0, ctx: Context(SymbolId(1 "#!DUMMY")) }, 10)), ___done: false }) | | ==> XIRF tok: `<unexpected>` | | Open(QName(None, LocalPart(NCName(SymbolId(82 "unexpected")))), OpenSpan(Span { len: 0, offset: 1, ctx: Context(SymbolId(1 "#!DUMMY")) }, 10), Depth(1)) | | ==> Parser after tok is expecting opening tag `<classify>`. | | ChildA(Expecting_) | | Lookahead: Some(Lookahead(Open(QName(None, LocalPart(NCName(SymbolId(82 "unexpected")))), OpenSpan(Span { len: 0, offset: 1, ctx: Context(SymbolId(1 "#!DUMMY")) }, 10), Depth(1)))) = note: this trace was output as a debugging aid because `cfg(test)`. [Parser::feed_tok] (input IR: XIRF) | ==> Parser before tok is expecting opening tag `<classify>`. | | ChildA(Expecting_) | | ==> XIRF tok: `<unexpected>` | | Open(QName(None, LocalPart(NCName(SymbolId(82 "unexpected")))), OpenSpan(Span { len: 0, offset: 1, ctx: Context(SymbolId(1 "#!DUMMY")) }, 10), Depth(1)) | | ==> Parser after tok is attempting to recover by ignoring element with unexpected name `unexpected` (expected `classify`). | | ChildA(RecoverEleIgnore_(QName(None, LocalPart(NCName(SymbolId(82 "unexpected")))), OpenSpan(Span { len: 0, offset: 1, ctx: Context(SymbolId(1 "#!DUMMY")) }, 10), Depth(1))) | | Lookahead: None = note: this trace was output as a debugging aid because `cfg(test)`. DEV-7145
2022-07-18 14:32:34 -04:00
/// Name of the intermediate representation (IR) this token represents.
///
/// This is used for diagnostic information,
/// primarily for debugging TAMER itself.
fn ir_name() -> &'static str;
/// Retrieve the [`Span`] representing the source location of the token.
fn span(&self) -> Span;
}
impl<T: Token> From<T> for Span {
fn from(tok: T) -> Self {
tok.span()
}
}
/// A type of [`Token`] that is not relevant.
///
/// This may be used when a [`Token`] type is required but only incidental,
/// such as for use with a [`ParseState`] in the context of a source of a
/// lowering operation.
#[derive(Debug, PartialEq)]
pub struct UnknownToken;
impl Token for UnknownToken {
fn span(&self) -> Span {
UNKNOWN_SPAN
}
tamer: parser::Parser: cfg(test) tracing This produces useful parse traces that are output as part of a failing test case. The parser generator macros can be a bit confusing to deal with when things go wrong, so this helps to clarify matters. This is _not_ intended to be machine-readable, but it does show that it would be possible to generate machine-readable output to visualize the entire lowering pipeline. Perhaps something for the future. I left these inline in Parser::feed_tok because they help to elucidate what is going on, just by reading what the trace would output---that is, it helps to make the method more self-documenting, albeit a tad bit more verbose. But with that said, it should probably be extracted at some point; I don't want this to set a precedent where composition is feasible. Here's an example from test cases: [Parser::feed_tok] (input IR: XIRF) | ==> Parser before tok is parsing attributes for `package`. | | Attrs_(SutAttrsState_ { ___ctx: (QName(None, LocalPart(NCName(SymbolId(46 "package")))), OpenSpan(Span { len: 0, offset: 0, ctx: Context(SymbolId(1 "#!DUMMY")) }, 10)), ___done: false }) | | ==> XIRF tok: `<unexpected>` | | Open(QName(None, LocalPart(NCName(SymbolId(82 "unexpected")))), OpenSpan(Span { len: 0, offset: 1, ctx: Context(SymbolId(1 "#!DUMMY")) }, 10), Depth(1)) | | ==> Parser after tok is expecting opening tag `<classify>`. | | ChildA(Expecting_) | | Lookahead: Some(Lookahead(Open(QName(None, LocalPart(NCName(SymbolId(82 "unexpected")))), OpenSpan(Span { len: 0, offset: 1, ctx: Context(SymbolId(1 "#!DUMMY")) }, 10), Depth(1)))) = note: this trace was output as a debugging aid because `cfg(test)`. [Parser::feed_tok] (input IR: XIRF) | ==> Parser before tok is expecting opening tag `<classify>`. | | ChildA(Expecting_) | | ==> XIRF tok: `<unexpected>` | | Open(QName(None, LocalPart(NCName(SymbolId(82 "unexpected")))), OpenSpan(Span { len: 0, offset: 1, ctx: Context(SymbolId(1 "#!DUMMY")) }, 10), Depth(1)) | | ==> Parser after tok is attempting to recover by ignoring element with unexpected name `unexpected` (expected `classify`). | | ChildA(RecoverEleIgnore_(QName(None, LocalPart(NCName(SymbolId(82 "unexpected")))), OpenSpan(Span { len: 0, offset: 1, ctx: Context(SymbolId(1 "#!DUMMY")) }, 10), Depth(1))) | | Lookahead: None = note: this trace was output as a debugging aid because `cfg(test)`. DEV-7145
2022-07-18 14:32:34 -04:00
fn ir_name() -> &'static str {
"<UNKNOWN IR>"
}
}
impl Display for UnknownToken {
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut std::fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result {
write!(f, "<unknown token>")
}
}
/// An IR object produced by a lowering operation on one or more [`Token`]s.
///
/// Note that an [`Object`] may also be a [`Token`] if it will be in turn
/// fed to another [`Parser`] for lowering.
///
/// This trait exists to disambiguate an otherwise unbounded type for
/// [`From`] conversions,
/// used in the [`Transition`] API to provide greater flexibility.
pub trait Object: Debug + PartialEq {}
tamer: Refactor asg_builder into obj::xmlo::lower and asg::air This finally uses `parse` all the way up to aggregation into the ASG, as can be seen by the mess in `poc`. This will be further simplified---I just need to get this committed so that I can mentally get it off my plate. I've been separating this commit into smaller commits, but there's a point where it's just not worth the effort anymore. I don't like making large changes such as this one. There is still work to do here. First, it's worth re-mentioning that `poc` means "proof-of-concept", and represents things that still need a proper home/abstraction. Secondly, `poc` is retrieving the context of two parsers---`LowerContext` and `Asg`. The latter is desirable, since it's the final aggregation point, but the former needs to be eliminated; in particular, packages need to be worked into the ASG so that `found` can be removed. Recursively loading `xmlo` files still happens in `poc`, but the compiler will need this as well. Once packages are on the ASG, along with their state, that responsibility can be generalized as well. That will then simplify lowering even further, to the point where hopefully everything has the same shape (once final aggregation has an abstraction), after which we can then create a final abstraction to concisely stitch everything together. Right now, Rust isn't able to infer `S` for `Lower<S, LS>`, which is unfortunate, but we'll be able to help it along with a more explicit abstraction. DEV-11864
2022-05-27 13:51:29 -04:00
impl Object for () {}
/// An infallible [`Token`] stream.
///
/// If the token stream originates from an operation that could potentially
/// fail and ought to be propagated,
/// use [`TokenResultStream`].
///
/// The name "stream" in place of "iterator" is intended to convey that this
/// type is expected to be processed in real-time as a stream,
/// not read into memory.
pub trait TokenStream<T: Token> = Iterator<Item = T>;
tamer: xir:tree: Begin work on composable XIRT parser The XIRT parser was initially written for test cases, so that unit tests should assert more easily on generated token streams (XIR). While it was planned, it wasn't clear what the eventual needs would be, which were expected to differ. Indeed, loading everything into a generic tree representation in memory is not appropriate---we should prefer streaming and avoiding heap allocations when they’re not necessary, and we should parse into an IR rather than a generic format, which ensures that the data follow a proper grammar and are semantically valid. When parsing attributes in an isolated context became necessary for the aforementioned task, the state machine of the XIRT parser was modified to accommodate. The opposite approach should have been taken---instead of adding complexity and special cases to the parser, and from a complex parser extracting a simple one (an attribute parser), we should be composing the larger (full XIRT) parser from smaller ones (e.g. attribute, child elements). A combinator, when used in a functional sense, refers not to combinatory logic but to the composition of more complex systems from smaller ones. The changes made as part of this commit begin to work toward combinators, though it's not necessarily evident yet (to you, the reader) how that'll work, since the code for it hasn't yet been written; this is commit is simply getting my work thusfar introduced so I can do some light refactoring before continuing on it. TAMER does not aim to introduce a parser combinator framework in its usual sense---it favors, instead, striking a proper balance with Rust’s type system that permits the convenience of combinators only in situations where they are needed, to avoid having to write new parser boilerplate. Specifically: 1. Rust’s type system should be used as combinators, so that parsers are automatically constructed from the type definition. 2. Primitive parsers are written as explicit automata, not as primitive combinators. 3. Parsing should directly produce IRs as a lowering operation below XIRT, rather than producing XIRT itself. That is, target IRs should consume XIRT and produce parse themselves immediately, during streaming. In the future, if more combinators are needed, they will be added; maybe this will eventually evolve into a more generic parser combinator framework for TAME, but that is certainly a waste of time right now. And, to be honest, I’m hoping that won’t be necessary.
2021-12-06 11:26:53 -05:00
/// A [`Token`] stream that may encounter errors during parsing.
///
/// If the stream cannot fail,
/// consider using [`TokenStream`].
pub trait TokenResultStream<T: Token, E: Error> = Iterator<Item = Result<T, E>>;
tamer: xir:tree: Begin work on composable XIRT parser The XIRT parser was initially written for test cases, so that unit tests should assert more easily on generated token streams (XIR). While it was planned, it wasn't clear what the eventual needs would be, which were expected to differ. Indeed, loading everything into a generic tree representation in memory is not appropriate---we should prefer streaming and avoiding heap allocations when they’re not necessary, and we should parse into an IR rather than a generic format, which ensures that the data follow a proper grammar and are semantically valid. When parsing attributes in an isolated context became necessary for the aforementioned task, the state machine of the XIRT parser was modified to accommodate. The opposite approach should have been taken---instead of adding complexity and special cases to the parser, and from a complex parser extracting a simple one (an attribute parser), we should be composing the larger (full XIRT) parser from smaller ones (e.g. attribute, child elements). A combinator, when used in a functional sense, refers not to combinatory logic but to the composition of more complex systems from smaller ones. The changes made as part of this commit begin to work toward combinators, though it's not necessarily evident yet (to you, the reader) how that'll work, since the code for it hasn't yet been written; this is commit is simply getting my work thusfar introduced so I can do some light refactoring before continuing on it. TAMER does not aim to introduce a parser combinator framework in its usual sense---it favors, instead, striking a proper balance with Rust’s type system that permits the convenience of combinators only in situations where they are needed, to avoid having to write new parser boilerplate. Specifically: 1. Rust’s type system should be used as combinators, so that parsers are automatically constructed from the type definition. 2. Primitive parsers are written as explicit automata, not as primitive combinators. 3. Parsing should directly produce IRs as a lowering operation below XIRT, rather than producing XIRT itself. That is, target IRs should consume XIRT and produce parse themselves immediately, during streaming. In the future, if more combinators are needed, they will be added; maybe this will eventually evolve into a more generic parser combinator framework for TAME, but that is certainly a waste of time right now. And, to be honest, I’m hoping that won’t be necessary.
2021-12-06 11:26:53 -05:00
#[cfg(test)]
pub mod test {
use super::*;
use crate::{
diagnose::{AnnotatedSpan, Diagnostic},
span::{dummy::DUMMY_SPAN as DS, UNKNOWN_SPAN},
sym::GlobalSymbolIntern,
};
use std::{assert_matches::assert_matches, iter::once};
tamer: xir:tree: Begin work on composable XIRT parser The XIRT parser was initially written for test cases, so that unit tests should assert more easily on generated token streams (XIR). While it was planned, it wasn't clear what the eventual needs would be, which were expected to differ. Indeed, loading everything into a generic tree representation in memory is not appropriate---we should prefer streaming and avoiding heap allocations when they’re not necessary, and we should parse into an IR rather than a generic format, which ensures that the data follow a proper grammar and are semantically valid. When parsing attributes in an isolated context became necessary for the aforementioned task, the state machine of the XIRT parser was modified to accommodate. The opposite approach should have been taken---instead of adding complexity and special cases to the parser, and from a complex parser extracting a simple one (an attribute parser), we should be composing the larger (full XIRT) parser from smaller ones (e.g. attribute, child elements). A combinator, when used in a functional sense, refers not to combinatory logic but to the composition of more complex systems from smaller ones. The changes made as part of this commit begin to work toward combinators, though it's not necessarily evident yet (to you, the reader) how that'll work, since the code for it hasn't yet been written; this is commit is simply getting my work thusfar introduced so I can do some light refactoring before continuing on it. TAMER does not aim to introduce a parser combinator framework in its usual sense---it favors, instead, striking a proper balance with Rust’s type system that permits the convenience of combinators only in situations where they are needed, to avoid having to write new parser boilerplate. Specifically: 1. Rust’s type system should be used as combinators, so that parsers are automatically constructed from the type definition. 2. Primitive parsers are written as explicit automata, not as primitive combinators. 3. Parsing should directly produce IRs as a lowering operation below XIRT, rather than producing XIRT itself. That is, target IRs should consume XIRT and produce parse themselves immediately, during streaming. In the future, if more combinators are needed, they will be added; maybe this will eventually evolve into a more generic parser combinator framework for TAME, but that is certainly a waste of time right now. And, to be honest, I’m hoping that won’t be necessary.
2021-12-06 11:26:53 -05:00
#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq, Clone)]
enum TestToken {
Close(Span),
MarkDone(Span),
Text(Span),
SetCtxVal(u8),
}
impl Display for TestToken {
tamer: parser::Parser: cfg(test) tracing This produces useful parse traces that are output as part of a failing test case. The parser generator macros can be a bit confusing to deal with when things go wrong, so this helps to clarify matters. This is _not_ intended to be machine-readable, but it does show that it would be possible to generate machine-readable output to visualize the entire lowering pipeline. Perhaps something for the future. I left these inline in Parser::feed_tok because they help to elucidate what is going on, just by reading what the trace would output---that is, it helps to make the method more self-documenting, albeit a tad bit more verbose. But with that said, it should probably be extracted at some point; I don't want this to set a precedent where composition is feasible. Here's an example from test cases: [Parser::feed_tok] (input IR: XIRF) | ==> Parser before tok is parsing attributes for `package`. | | Attrs_(SutAttrsState_ { ___ctx: (QName(None, LocalPart(NCName(SymbolId(46 "package")))), OpenSpan(Span { len: 0, offset: 0, ctx: Context(SymbolId(1 "#!DUMMY")) }, 10)), ___done: false }) | | ==> XIRF tok: `<unexpected>` | | Open(QName(None, LocalPart(NCName(SymbolId(82 "unexpected")))), OpenSpan(Span { len: 0, offset: 1, ctx: Context(SymbolId(1 "#!DUMMY")) }, 10), Depth(1)) | | ==> Parser after tok is expecting opening tag `<classify>`. | | ChildA(Expecting_) | | Lookahead: Some(Lookahead(Open(QName(None, LocalPart(NCName(SymbolId(82 "unexpected")))), OpenSpan(Span { len: 0, offset: 1, ctx: Context(SymbolId(1 "#!DUMMY")) }, 10), Depth(1)))) = note: this trace was output as a debugging aid because `cfg(test)`. [Parser::feed_tok] (input IR: XIRF) | ==> Parser before tok is expecting opening tag `<classify>`. | | ChildA(Expecting_) | | ==> XIRF tok: `<unexpected>` | | Open(QName(None, LocalPart(NCName(SymbolId(82 "unexpected")))), OpenSpan(Span { len: 0, offset: 1, ctx: Context(SymbolId(1 "#!DUMMY")) }, 10), Depth(1)) | | ==> Parser after tok is attempting to recover by ignoring element with unexpected name `unexpected` (expected `classify`). | | ChildA(RecoverEleIgnore_(QName(None, LocalPart(NCName(SymbolId(82 "unexpected")))), OpenSpan(Span { len: 0, offset: 1, ctx: Context(SymbolId(1 "#!DUMMY")) }, 10), Depth(1))) | | Lookahead: None = note: this trace was output as a debugging aid because `cfg(test)`. DEV-7145
2022-07-18 14:32:34 -04:00
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut std::fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result {
write!(f, "(test token)")
}
}
impl Token for TestToken {
tamer: parser::Parser: cfg(test) tracing This produces useful parse traces that are output as part of a failing test case. The parser generator macros can be a bit confusing to deal with when things go wrong, so this helps to clarify matters. This is _not_ intended to be machine-readable, but it does show that it would be possible to generate machine-readable output to visualize the entire lowering pipeline. Perhaps something for the future. I left these inline in Parser::feed_tok because they help to elucidate what is going on, just by reading what the trace would output---that is, it helps to make the method more self-documenting, albeit a tad bit more verbose. But with that said, it should probably be extracted at some point; I don't want this to set a precedent where composition is feasible. Here's an example from test cases: [Parser::feed_tok] (input IR: XIRF) | ==> Parser before tok is parsing attributes for `package`. | | Attrs_(SutAttrsState_ { ___ctx: (QName(None, LocalPart(NCName(SymbolId(46 "package")))), OpenSpan(Span { len: 0, offset: 0, ctx: Context(SymbolId(1 "#!DUMMY")) }, 10)), ___done: false }) | | ==> XIRF tok: `<unexpected>` | | Open(QName(None, LocalPart(NCName(SymbolId(82 "unexpected")))), OpenSpan(Span { len: 0, offset: 1, ctx: Context(SymbolId(1 "#!DUMMY")) }, 10), Depth(1)) | | ==> Parser after tok is expecting opening tag `<classify>`. | | ChildA(Expecting_) | | Lookahead: Some(Lookahead(Open(QName(None, LocalPart(NCName(SymbolId(82 "unexpected")))), OpenSpan(Span { len: 0, offset: 1, ctx: Context(SymbolId(1 "#!DUMMY")) }, 10), Depth(1)))) = note: this trace was output as a debugging aid because `cfg(test)`. [Parser::feed_tok] (input IR: XIRF) | ==> Parser before tok is expecting opening tag `<classify>`. | | ChildA(Expecting_) | | ==> XIRF tok: `<unexpected>` | | Open(QName(None, LocalPart(NCName(SymbolId(82 "unexpected")))), OpenSpan(Span { len: 0, offset: 1, ctx: Context(SymbolId(1 "#!DUMMY")) }, 10), Depth(1)) | | ==> Parser after tok is attempting to recover by ignoring element with unexpected name `unexpected` (expected `classify`). | | ChildA(RecoverEleIgnore_(QName(None, LocalPart(NCName(SymbolId(82 "unexpected")))), OpenSpan(Span { len: 0, offset: 1, ctx: Context(SymbolId(1 "#!DUMMY")) }, 10), Depth(1))) | | Lookahead: None = note: this trace was output as a debugging aid because `cfg(test)`. DEV-7145
2022-07-18 14:32:34 -04:00
fn ir_name() -> &'static str {
"<PARSE TEST IR>"
}
fn span(&self) -> Span {
use TestToken::*;
match self {
Close(span) | MarkDone(span) | Text(span) => *span,
_ => UNKNOWN_SPAN,
}
}
}
impl Object for TestToken {}
tamer: xir:tree: Begin work on composable XIRT parser The XIRT parser was initially written for test cases, so that unit tests should assert more easily on generated token streams (XIR). While it was planned, it wasn't clear what the eventual needs would be, which were expected to differ. Indeed, loading everything into a generic tree representation in memory is not appropriate---we should prefer streaming and avoiding heap allocations when they’re not necessary, and we should parse into an IR rather than a generic format, which ensures that the data follow a proper grammar and are semantically valid. When parsing attributes in an isolated context became necessary for the aforementioned task, the state machine of the XIRT parser was modified to accommodate. The opposite approach should have been taken---instead of adding complexity and special cases to the parser, and from a complex parser extracting a simple one (an attribute parser), we should be composing the larger (full XIRT) parser from smaller ones (e.g. attribute, child elements). A combinator, when used in a functional sense, refers not to combinatory logic but to the composition of more complex systems from smaller ones. The changes made as part of this commit begin to work toward combinators, though it's not necessarily evident yet (to you, the reader) how that'll work, since the code for it hasn't yet been written; this is commit is simply getting my work thusfar introduced so I can do some light refactoring before continuing on it. TAMER does not aim to introduce a parser combinator framework in its usual sense---it favors, instead, striking a proper balance with Rust’s type system that permits the convenience of combinators only in situations where they are needed, to avoid having to write new parser boilerplate. Specifically: 1. Rust’s type system should be used as combinators, so that parsers are automatically constructed from the type definition. 2. Primitive parsers are written as explicit automata, not as primitive combinators. 3. Parsing should directly produce IRs as a lowering operation below XIRT, rather than producing XIRT itself. That is, target IRs should consume XIRT and produce parse themselves immediately, during streaming. In the future, if more combinators are needed, they will be added; maybe this will eventually evolve into a more generic parser combinator framework for TAME, but that is certainly a waste of time right now. And, to be honest, I’m hoping that won’t be necessary.
2021-12-06 11:26:53 -05:00
#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq)]
enum EchoState {
Empty,
Done,
}
impl Default for EchoState {
fn default() -> Self {
Self::Empty
}
}
#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Default)]
struct StubContext {
val: u8,
}
impl ParseState for EchoState {
type Token = TestToken;
type Object = TestToken;
tamer: xir:tree: Begin work on composable XIRT parser The XIRT parser was initially written for test cases, so that unit tests should assert more easily on generated token streams (XIR). While it was planned, it wasn't clear what the eventual needs would be, which were expected to differ. Indeed, loading everything into a generic tree representation in memory is not appropriate---we should prefer streaming and avoiding heap allocations when they’re not necessary, and we should parse into an IR rather than a generic format, which ensures that the data follow a proper grammar and are semantically valid. When parsing attributes in an isolated context became necessary for the aforementioned task, the state machine of the XIRT parser was modified to accommodate. The opposite approach should have been taken---instead of adding complexity and special cases to the parser, and from a complex parser extracting a simple one (an attribute parser), we should be composing the larger (full XIRT) parser from smaller ones (e.g. attribute, child elements). A combinator, when used in a functional sense, refers not to combinatory logic but to the composition of more complex systems from smaller ones. The changes made as part of this commit begin to work toward combinators, though it's not necessarily evident yet (to you, the reader) how that'll work, since the code for it hasn't yet been written; this is commit is simply getting my work thusfar introduced so I can do some light refactoring before continuing on it. TAMER does not aim to introduce a parser combinator framework in its usual sense---it favors, instead, striking a proper balance with Rust’s type system that permits the convenience of combinators only in situations where they are needed, to avoid having to write new parser boilerplate. Specifically: 1. Rust’s type system should be used as combinators, so that parsers are automatically constructed from the type definition. 2. Primitive parsers are written as explicit automata, not as primitive combinators. 3. Parsing should directly produce IRs as a lowering operation below XIRT, rather than producing XIRT itself. That is, target IRs should consume XIRT and produce parse themselves immediately, during streaming. In the future, if more combinators are needed, they will be added; maybe this will eventually evolve into a more generic parser combinator framework for TAME, but that is certainly a waste of time right now. And, to be honest, I’m hoping that won’t be necessary.
2021-12-06 11:26:53 -05:00
type Error = EchoStateError;
type Context = StubContext;
fn parse_token(
self,
tok: TestToken,
ctx: &mut StubContext,
) -> TransitionResult<Self> {
tamer: xir:tree: Begin work on composable XIRT parser The XIRT parser was initially written for test cases, so that unit tests should assert more easily on generated token streams (XIR). While it was planned, it wasn't clear what the eventual needs would be, which were expected to differ. Indeed, loading everything into a generic tree representation in memory is not appropriate---we should prefer streaming and avoiding heap allocations when they’re not necessary, and we should parse into an IR rather than a generic format, which ensures that the data follow a proper grammar and are semantically valid. When parsing attributes in an isolated context became necessary for the aforementioned task, the state machine of the XIRT parser was modified to accommodate. The opposite approach should have been taken---instead of adding complexity and special cases to the parser, and from a complex parser extracting a simple one (an attribute parser), we should be composing the larger (full XIRT) parser from smaller ones (e.g. attribute, child elements). A combinator, when used in a functional sense, refers not to combinatory logic but to the composition of more complex systems from smaller ones. The changes made as part of this commit begin to work toward combinators, though it's not necessarily evident yet (to you, the reader) how that'll work, since the code for it hasn't yet been written; this is commit is simply getting my work thusfar introduced so I can do some light refactoring before continuing on it. TAMER does not aim to introduce a parser combinator framework in its usual sense---it favors, instead, striking a proper balance with Rust’s type system that permits the convenience of combinators only in situations where they are needed, to avoid having to write new parser boilerplate. Specifically: 1. Rust’s type system should be used as combinators, so that parsers are automatically constructed from the type definition. 2. Primitive parsers are written as explicit automata, not as primitive combinators. 3. Parsing should directly produce IRs as a lowering operation below XIRT, rather than producing XIRT itself. That is, target IRs should consume XIRT and produce parse themselves immediately, during streaming. In the future, if more combinators are needed, they will be added; maybe this will eventually evolve into a more generic parser combinator framework for TAME, but that is certainly a waste of time right now. And, to be honest, I’m hoping that won’t be necessary.
2021-12-06 11:26:53 -05:00
match tok {
TestToken::MarkDone(..) => Transition(Self::Done).ok(tok),
TestToken::Close(..) => {
Transition(self).err(EchoStateError::InnerError(tok))
tamer: xir:tree: Begin work on composable XIRT parser The XIRT parser was initially written for test cases, so that unit tests should assert more easily on generated token streams (XIR). While it was planned, it wasn't clear what the eventual needs would be, which were expected to differ. Indeed, loading everything into a generic tree representation in memory is not appropriate---we should prefer streaming and avoiding heap allocations when they’re not necessary, and we should parse into an IR rather than a generic format, which ensures that the data follow a proper grammar and are semantically valid. When parsing attributes in an isolated context became necessary for the aforementioned task, the state machine of the XIRT parser was modified to accommodate. The opposite approach should have been taken---instead of adding complexity and special cases to the parser, and from a complex parser extracting a simple one (an attribute parser), we should be composing the larger (full XIRT) parser from smaller ones (e.g. attribute, child elements). A combinator, when used in a functional sense, refers not to combinatory logic but to the composition of more complex systems from smaller ones. The changes made as part of this commit begin to work toward combinators, though it's not necessarily evident yet (to you, the reader) how that'll work, since the code for it hasn't yet been written; this is commit is simply getting my work thusfar introduced so I can do some light refactoring before continuing on it. TAMER does not aim to introduce a parser combinator framework in its usual sense---it favors, instead, striking a proper balance with Rust’s type system that permits the convenience of combinators only in situations where they are needed, to avoid having to write new parser boilerplate. Specifically: 1. Rust’s type system should be used as combinators, so that parsers are automatically constructed from the type definition. 2. Primitive parsers are written as explicit automata, not as primitive combinators. 3. Parsing should directly produce IRs as a lowering operation below XIRT, rather than producing XIRT itself. That is, target IRs should consume XIRT and produce parse themselves immediately, during streaming. In the future, if more combinators are needed, they will be added; maybe this will eventually evolve into a more generic parser combinator framework for TAME, but that is certainly a waste of time right now. And, to be honest, I’m hoping that won’t be necessary.
2021-12-06 11:26:53 -05:00
}
TestToken::Text(..) => Transition(self).dead(tok),
TestToken::SetCtxVal(val) => {
ctx.val = val;
Transition(Self::Done).incomplete()
}
tamer: xir:tree: Begin work on composable XIRT parser The XIRT parser was initially written for test cases, so that unit tests should assert more easily on generated token streams (XIR). While it was planned, it wasn't clear what the eventual needs would be, which were expected to differ. Indeed, loading everything into a generic tree representation in memory is not appropriate---we should prefer streaming and avoiding heap allocations when they’re not necessary, and we should parse into an IR rather than a generic format, which ensures that the data follow a proper grammar and are semantically valid. When parsing attributes in an isolated context became necessary for the aforementioned task, the state machine of the XIRT parser was modified to accommodate. The opposite approach should have been taken---instead of adding complexity and special cases to the parser, and from a complex parser extracting a simple one (an attribute parser), we should be composing the larger (full XIRT) parser from smaller ones (e.g. attribute, child elements). A combinator, when used in a functional sense, refers not to combinatory logic but to the composition of more complex systems from smaller ones. The changes made as part of this commit begin to work toward combinators, though it's not necessarily evident yet (to you, the reader) how that'll work, since the code for it hasn't yet been written; this is commit is simply getting my work thusfar introduced so I can do some light refactoring before continuing on it. TAMER does not aim to introduce a parser combinator framework in its usual sense---it favors, instead, striking a proper balance with Rust’s type system that permits the convenience of combinators only in situations where they are needed, to avoid having to write new parser boilerplate. Specifically: 1. Rust’s type system should be used as combinators, so that parsers are automatically constructed from the type definition. 2. Primitive parsers are written as explicit automata, not as primitive combinators. 3. Parsing should directly produce IRs as a lowering operation below XIRT, rather than producing XIRT itself. That is, target IRs should consume XIRT and produce parse themselves immediately, during streaming. In the future, if more combinators are needed, they will be added; maybe this will eventually evolve into a more generic parser combinator framework for TAME, but that is certainly a waste of time right now. And, to be honest, I’m hoping that won’t be necessary.
2021-12-06 11:26:53 -05:00
}
}
fn is_accepting(&self, _: &Self::Context) -> bool {
tamer: xir:tree: Begin work on composable XIRT parser The XIRT parser was initially written for test cases, so that unit tests should assert more easily on generated token streams (XIR). While it was planned, it wasn't clear what the eventual needs would be, which were expected to differ. Indeed, loading everything into a generic tree representation in memory is not appropriate---we should prefer streaming and avoiding heap allocations when they’re not necessary, and we should parse into an IR rather than a generic format, which ensures that the data follow a proper grammar and are semantically valid. When parsing attributes in an isolated context became necessary for the aforementioned task, the state machine of the XIRT parser was modified to accommodate. The opposite approach should have been taken---instead of adding complexity and special cases to the parser, and from a complex parser extracting a simple one (an attribute parser), we should be composing the larger (full XIRT) parser from smaller ones (e.g. attribute, child elements). A combinator, when used in a functional sense, refers not to combinatory logic but to the composition of more complex systems from smaller ones. The changes made as part of this commit begin to work toward combinators, though it's not necessarily evident yet (to you, the reader) how that'll work, since the code for it hasn't yet been written; this is commit is simply getting my work thusfar introduced so I can do some light refactoring before continuing on it. TAMER does not aim to introduce a parser combinator framework in its usual sense---it favors, instead, striking a proper balance with Rust’s type system that permits the convenience of combinators only in situations where they are needed, to avoid having to write new parser boilerplate. Specifically: 1. Rust’s type system should be used as combinators, so that parsers are automatically constructed from the type definition. 2. Primitive parsers are written as explicit automata, not as primitive combinators. 3. Parsing should directly produce IRs as a lowering operation below XIRT, rather than producing XIRT itself. That is, target IRs should consume XIRT and produce parse themselves immediately, during streaming. In the future, if more combinators are needed, they will be added; maybe this will eventually evolve into a more generic parser combinator framework for TAME, but that is certainly a waste of time right now. And, to be honest, I’m hoping that won’t be necessary.
2021-12-06 11:26:53 -05:00
*self == Self::Done
}
}
impl Display for EchoState {
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut std::fmt::Formatter) -> std::fmt::Result {
write!(f, "<EchoState as Display>::fmt")
}
}
tamer: xir::tree: Integrate AttrParserState into Stack Note that AttrParse{r=>}State needs renaming, and Stack will get a better name down the line too. This commit message is accurate, but confusing. This performs the long-awaited task of trying to observe, concretely, how to combine two automata. This has the effect of stitching together the state machines, such that the union of the two is equivalent to the original monolith. The next step will be to abstract this away. There are some important things to note here. First, this introduces a new "dead" state concept, where here a dead state is defined as an _accepting_ state that has no state transitions for the given input token. This is more strict than a dead state as defined in, for example, the Dragon Book, where backtracking may occur. The reason I chose for a Dead state to be accepting is simple: it represents a lookahead situation. It says, "I don't know what this token is, but I've done my job, so it may be useful in a parent context". The "I've done my job" part is only applicable in an accepting state. If the parser is _not_ in an accepting state, then an unknown token is simply an error; we should _not_ try to backtrack or anything of the sort, because we want only a single token of lookahead. The reason this was done is because it's otherwise difficult to compose the two parsers without requiring that AttrEnd exist in every XIR stream; this has always been an awkward delimiter that was introduced to make the parser LL(0), but I tried to compromise by saying that it was optional. Of course, I knew that decision caused awkward inconsistencies, I had just hoped that those inconsistencies wouldn't manifest in practical issues. Well, now it did, and the benefits of AttrEnd that we had in the previous construction do not exist in this one. Consequently, it makes more sense to simply go from LL(0) to LL(1), which makes AttrEnd unnecessary, and a future commit will remove it entirely. All of this information will be documented, but I want to get further in the implementation first to make sure I don't change course again and therefore waste my time on docs. DEV-11268
2021-12-16 09:44:02 -05:00
#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq)]
tamer: xir:tree: Begin work on composable XIRT parser The XIRT parser was initially written for test cases, so that unit tests should assert more easily on generated token streams (XIR). While it was planned, it wasn't clear what the eventual needs would be, which were expected to differ. Indeed, loading everything into a generic tree representation in memory is not appropriate---we should prefer streaming and avoiding heap allocations when they’re not necessary, and we should parse into an IR rather than a generic format, which ensures that the data follow a proper grammar and are semantically valid. When parsing attributes in an isolated context became necessary for the aforementioned task, the state machine of the XIRT parser was modified to accommodate. The opposite approach should have been taken---instead of adding complexity and special cases to the parser, and from a complex parser extracting a simple one (an attribute parser), we should be composing the larger (full XIRT) parser from smaller ones (e.g. attribute, child elements). A combinator, when used in a functional sense, refers not to combinatory logic but to the composition of more complex systems from smaller ones. The changes made as part of this commit begin to work toward combinators, though it's not necessarily evident yet (to you, the reader) how that'll work, since the code for it hasn't yet been written; this is commit is simply getting my work thusfar introduced so I can do some light refactoring before continuing on it. TAMER does not aim to introduce a parser combinator framework in its usual sense---it favors, instead, striking a proper balance with Rust’s type system that permits the convenience of combinators only in situations where they are needed, to avoid having to write new parser boilerplate. Specifically: 1. Rust’s type system should be used as combinators, so that parsers are automatically constructed from the type definition. 2. Primitive parsers are written as explicit automata, not as primitive combinators. 3. Parsing should directly produce IRs as a lowering operation below XIRT, rather than producing XIRT itself. That is, target IRs should consume XIRT and produce parse themselves immediately, during streaming. In the future, if more combinators are needed, they will be added; maybe this will eventually evolve into a more generic parser combinator framework for TAME, but that is certainly a waste of time right now. And, to be honest, I’m hoping that won’t be necessary.
2021-12-06 11:26:53 -05:00
enum EchoStateError {
InnerError(TestToken),
tamer: xir:tree: Begin work on composable XIRT parser The XIRT parser was initially written for test cases, so that unit tests should assert more easily on generated token streams (XIR). While it was planned, it wasn't clear what the eventual needs would be, which were expected to differ. Indeed, loading everything into a generic tree representation in memory is not appropriate---we should prefer streaming and avoiding heap allocations when they’re not necessary, and we should parse into an IR rather than a generic format, which ensures that the data follow a proper grammar and are semantically valid. When parsing attributes in an isolated context became necessary for the aforementioned task, the state machine of the XIRT parser was modified to accommodate. The opposite approach should have been taken---instead of adding complexity and special cases to the parser, and from a complex parser extracting a simple one (an attribute parser), we should be composing the larger (full XIRT) parser from smaller ones (e.g. attribute, child elements). A combinator, when used in a functional sense, refers not to combinatory logic but to the composition of more complex systems from smaller ones. The changes made as part of this commit begin to work toward combinators, though it's not necessarily evident yet (to you, the reader) how that'll work, since the code for it hasn't yet been written; this is commit is simply getting my work thusfar introduced so I can do some light refactoring before continuing on it. TAMER does not aim to introduce a parser combinator framework in its usual sense---it favors, instead, striking a proper balance with Rust’s type system that permits the convenience of combinators only in situations where they are needed, to avoid having to write new parser boilerplate. Specifically: 1. Rust’s type system should be used as combinators, so that parsers are automatically constructed from the type definition. 2. Primitive parsers are written as explicit automata, not as primitive combinators. 3. Parsing should directly produce IRs as a lowering operation below XIRT, rather than producing XIRT itself. That is, target IRs should consume XIRT and produce parse themselves immediately, during streaming. In the future, if more combinators are needed, they will be added; maybe this will eventually evolve into a more generic parser combinator framework for TAME, but that is certainly a waste of time right now. And, to be honest, I’m hoping that won’t be necessary.
2021-12-06 11:26:53 -05:00
}
impl Display for EchoStateError {
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut std::fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result {
write!(f, "test EchoStateError")
tamer: xir:tree: Begin work on composable XIRT parser The XIRT parser was initially written for test cases, so that unit tests should assert more easily on generated token streams (XIR). While it was planned, it wasn't clear what the eventual needs would be, which were expected to differ. Indeed, loading everything into a generic tree representation in memory is not appropriate---we should prefer streaming and avoiding heap allocations when they’re not necessary, and we should parse into an IR rather than a generic format, which ensures that the data follow a proper grammar and are semantically valid. When parsing attributes in an isolated context became necessary for the aforementioned task, the state machine of the XIRT parser was modified to accommodate. The opposite approach should have been taken---instead of adding complexity and special cases to the parser, and from a complex parser extracting a simple one (an attribute parser), we should be composing the larger (full XIRT) parser from smaller ones (e.g. attribute, child elements). A combinator, when used in a functional sense, refers not to combinatory logic but to the composition of more complex systems from smaller ones. The changes made as part of this commit begin to work toward combinators, though it's not necessarily evident yet (to you, the reader) how that'll work, since the code for it hasn't yet been written; this is commit is simply getting my work thusfar introduced so I can do some light refactoring before continuing on it. TAMER does not aim to introduce a parser combinator framework in its usual sense---it favors, instead, striking a proper balance with Rust’s type system that permits the convenience of combinators only in situations where they are needed, to avoid having to write new parser boilerplate. Specifically: 1. Rust’s type system should be used as combinators, so that parsers are automatically constructed from the type definition. 2. Primitive parsers are written as explicit automata, not as primitive combinators. 3. Parsing should directly produce IRs as a lowering operation below XIRT, rather than producing XIRT itself. That is, target IRs should consume XIRT and produce parse themselves immediately, during streaming. In the future, if more combinators are needed, they will be added; maybe this will eventually evolve into a more generic parser combinator framework for TAME, but that is certainly a waste of time right now. And, to be honest, I’m hoping that won’t be necessary.
2021-12-06 11:26:53 -05:00
}
}
impl Error for EchoStateError {
fn source(&self) -> Option<&(dyn Error + 'static)> {
None
}
}
impl Diagnostic for EchoStateError {
fn describe(&self) -> Vec<AnnotatedSpan> {
vec![]
}
}
type Sut<I> = Parser<EchoState, I>;
tamer: xir:tree: Begin work on composable XIRT parser The XIRT parser was initially written for test cases, so that unit tests should assert more easily on generated token streams (XIR). While it was planned, it wasn't clear what the eventual needs would be, which were expected to differ. Indeed, loading everything into a generic tree representation in memory is not appropriate---we should prefer streaming and avoiding heap allocations when they’re not necessary, and we should parse into an IR rather than a generic format, which ensures that the data follow a proper grammar and are semantically valid. When parsing attributes in an isolated context became necessary for the aforementioned task, the state machine of the XIRT parser was modified to accommodate. The opposite approach should have been taken---instead of adding complexity and special cases to the parser, and from a complex parser extracting a simple one (an attribute parser), we should be composing the larger (full XIRT) parser from smaller ones (e.g. attribute, child elements). A combinator, when used in a functional sense, refers not to combinatory logic but to the composition of more complex systems from smaller ones. The changes made as part of this commit begin to work toward combinators, though it's not necessarily evident yet (to you, the reader) how that'll work, since the code for it hasn't yet been written; this is commit is simply getting my work thusfar introduced so I can do some light refactoring before continuing on it. TAMER does not aim to introduce a parser combinator framework in its usual sense---it favors, instead, striking a proper balance with Rust’s type system that permits the convenience of combinators only in situations where they are needed, to avoid having to write new parser boilerplate. Specifically: 1. Rust’s type system should be used as combinators, so that parsers are automatically constructed from the type definition. 2. Primitive parsers are written as explicit automata, not as primitive combinators. 3. Parsing should directly produce IRs as a lowering operation below XIRT, rather than producing XIRT itself. That is, target IRs should consume XIRT and produce parse themselves immediately, during streaming. In the future, if more combinators are needed, they will be added; maybe this will eventually evolve into a more generic parser combinator framework for TAME, but that is certainly a waste of time right now. And, to be honest, I’m hoping that won’t be necessary.
2021-12-06 11:26:53 -05:00
#[test]
fn successful_parse_in_accepting_state_with_spans() {
// EchoState is placed into a Done state given Comment.
let tok = TestToken::MarkDone(DS);
let mut toks = once(tok.clone());
tamer: xir:tree: Begin work on composable XIRT parser The XIRT parser was initially written for test cases, so that unit tests should assert more easily on generated token streams (XIR). While it was planned, it wasn't clear what the eventual needs would be, which were expected to differ. Indeed, loading everything into a generic tree representation in memory is not appropriate---we should prefer streaming and avoiding heap allocations when they’re not necessary, and we should parse into an IR rather than a generic format, which ensures that the data follow a proper grammar and are semantically valid. When parsing attributes in an isolated context became necessary for the aforementioned task, the state machine of the XIRT parser was modified to accommodate. The opposite approach should have been taken---instead of adding complexity and special cases to the parser, and from a complex parser extracting a simple one (an attribute parser), we should be composing the larger (full XIRT) parser from smaller ones (e.g. attribute, child elements). A combinator, when used in a functional sense, refers not to combinatory logic but to the composition of more complex systems from smaller ones. The changes made as part of this commit begin to work toward combinators, though it's not necessarily evident yet (to you, the reader) how that'll work, since the code for it hasn't yet been written; this is commit is simply getting my work thusfar introduced so I can do some light refactoring before continuing on it. TAMER does not aim to introduce a parser combinator framework in its usual sense---it favors, instead, striking a proper balance with Rust’s type system that permits the convenience of combinators only in situations where they are needed, to avoid having to write new parser boilerplate. Specifically: 1. Rust’s type system should be used as combinators, so that parsers are automatically constructed from the type definition. 2. Primitive parsers are written as explicit automata, not as primitive combinators. 3. Parsing should directly produce IRs as a lowering operation below XIRT, rather than producing XIRT itself. That is, target IRs should consume XIRT and produce parse themselves immediately, during streaming. In the future, if more combinators are needed, they will be added; maybe this will eventually evolve into a more generic parser combinator framework for TAME, but that is certainly a waste of time right now. And, to be honest, I’m hoping that won’t be necessary.
2021-12-06 11:26:53 -05:00
let mut sut = Sut::from(&mut toks);
// The first token should be processed normally.
// EchoState proxies the token back.
assert_eq!(Some(Ok(Parsed::Object(tok))), sut.next());
tamer: xir:tree: Begin work on composable XIRT parser The XIRT parser was initially written for test cases, so that unit tests should assert more easily on generated token streams (XIR). While it was planned, it wasn't clear what the eventual needs would be, which were expected to differ. Indeed, loading everything into a generic tree representation in memory is not appropriate---we should prefer streaming and avoiding heap allocations when they’re not necessary, and we should parse into an IR rather than a generic format, which ensures that the data follow a proper grammar and are semantically valid. When parsing attributes in an isolated context became necessary for the aforementioned task, the state machine of the XIRT parser was modified to accommodate. The opposite approach should have been taken---instead of adding complexity and special cases to the parser, and from a complex parser extracting a simple one (an attribute parser), we should be composing the larger (full XIRT) parser from smaller ones (e.g. attribute, child elements). A combinator, when used in a functional sense, refers not to combinatory logic but to the composition of more complex systems from smaller ones. The changes made as part of this commit begin to work toward combinators, though it's not necessarily evident yet (to you, the reader) how that'll work, since the code for it hasn't yet been written; this is commit is simply getting my work thusfar introduced so I can do some light refactoring before continuing on it. TAMER does not aim to introduce a parser combinator framework in its usual sense---it favors, instead, striking a proper balance with Rust’s type system that permits the convenience of combinators only in situations where they are needed, to avoid having to write new parser boilerplate. Specifically: 1. Rust’s type system should be used as combinators, so that parsers are automatically constructed from the type definition. 2. Primitive parsers are written as explicit automata, not as primitive combinators. 3. Parsing should directly produce IRs as a lowering operation below XIRT, rather than producing XIRT itself. That is, target IRs should consume XIRT and produce parse themselves immediately, during streaming. In the future, if more combinators are needed, they will be added; maybe this will eventually evolve into a more generic parser combinator framework for TAME, but that is certainly a waste of time right now. And, to be honest, I’m hoping that won’t be necessary.
2021-12-06 11:26:53 -05:00
// This is now the end of the token stream,
// which should be okay provided that the first token put us into
// a proper accepting state.
assert_eq!(None, sut.next());
// Further, finalizing should work in this state.
assert!(sut.finalize().is_ok());
}
#[test]
fn fails_on_end_of_stream_when_not_in_accepting_state() {
let span = Span::new(10, 20, "ctx".intern());
let mut toks = [TestToken::Close(span)].into_iter();
tamer: xir:tree: Begin work on composable XIRT parser The XIRT parser was initially written for test cases, so that unit tests should assert more easily on generated token streams (XIR). While it was planned, it wasn't clear what the eventual needs would be, which were expected to differ. Indeed, loading everything into a generic tree representation in memory is not appropriate---we should prefer streaming and avoiding heap allocations when they’re not necessary, and we should parse into an IR rather than a generic format, which ensures that the data follow a proper grammar and are semantically valid. When parsing attributes in an isolated context became necessary for the aforementioned task, the state machine of the XIRT parser was modified to accommodate. The opposite approach should have been taken---instead of adding complexity and special cases to the parser, and from a complex parser extracting a simple one (an attribute parser), we should be composing the larger (full XIRT) parser from smaller ones (e.g. attribute, child elements). A combinator, when used in a functional sense, refers not to combinatory logic but to the composition of more complex systems from smaller ones. The changes made as part of this commit begin to work toward combinators, though it's not necessarily evident yet (to you, the reader) how that'll work, since the code for it hasn't yet been written; this is commit is simply getting my work thusfar introduced so I can do some light refactoring before continuing on it. TAMER does not aim to introduce a parser combinator framework in its usual sense---it favors, instead, striking a proper balance with Rust’s type system that permits the convenience of combinators only in situations where they are needed, to avoid having to write new parser boilerplate. Specifically: 1. Rust’s type system should be used as combinators, so that parsers are automatically constructed from the type definition. 2. Primitive parsers are written as explicit automata, not as primitive combinators. 3. Parsing should directly produce IRs as a lowering operation below XIRT, rather than producing XIRT itself. That is, target IRs should consume XIRT and produce parse themselves immediately, during streaming. In the future, if more combinators are needed, they will be added; maybe this will eventually evolve into a more generic parser combinator framework for TAME, but that is certainly a waste of time right now. And, to be honest, I’m hoping that won’t be necessary.
2021-12-06 11:26:53 -05:00
let mut sut = Sut::from(&mut toks);
// The first token is fine,
// and allows us to acquire our most recent span.
sut.next();
tamer: xir:tree: Begin work on composable XIRT parser The XIRT parser was initially written for test cases, so that unit tests should assert more easily on generated token streams (XIR). While it was planned, it wasn't clear what the eventual needs would be, which were expected to differ. Indeed, loading everything into a generic tree representation in memory is not appropriate---we should prefer streaming and avoiding heap allocations when they’re not necessary, and we should parse into an IR rather than a generic format, which ensures that the data follow a proper grammar and are semantically valid. When parsing attributes in an isolated context became necessary for the aforementioned task, the state machine of the XIRT parser was modified to accommodate. The opposite approach should have been taken---instead of adding complexity and special cases to the parser, and from a complex parser extracting a simple one (an attribute parser), we should be composing the larger (full XIRT) parser from smaller ones (e.g. attribute, child elements). A combinator, when used in a functional sense, refers not to combinatory logic but to the composition of more complex systems from smaller ones. The changes made as part of this commit begin to work toward combinators, though it's not necessarily evident yet (to you, the reader) how that'll work, since the code for it hasn't yet been written; this is commit is simply getting my work thusfar introduced so I can do some light refactoring before continuing on it. TAMER does not aim to introduce a parser combinator framework in its usual sense---it favors, instead, striking a proper balance with Rust’s type system that permits the convenience of combinators only in situations where they are needed, to avoid having to write new parser boilerplate. Specifically: 1. Rust’s type system should be used as combinators, so that parsers are automatically constructed from the type definition. 2. Primitive parsers are written as explicit automata, not as primitive combinators. 3. Parsing should directly produce IRs as a lowering operation below XIRT, rather than producing XIRT itself. That is, target IRs should consume XIRT and produce parse themselves immediately, during streaming. In the future, if more combinators are needed, they will be added; maybe this will eventually evolve into a more generic parser combinator framework for TAME, but that is certainly a waste of time right now. And, to be honest, I’m hoping that won’t be necessary.
2021-12-06 11:26:53 -05:00
// Given that we have no tokens,
// and that EchoState::default does not start in an accepting
// state,
// we must fail when we encounter the end of the stream.
assert_eq!(
Some(Err(ParseError::FinalizeError(
FinalizeError::UnexpectedEof(
span.endpoints().1.unwrap(),
// All the states have the same string
// (at time of writing).
EchoState::default().to_string(),
)
))),
sut.next()
);
tamer: xir:tree: Begin work on composable XIRT parser The XIRT parser was initially written for test cases, so that unit tests should assert more easily on generated token streams (XIR). While it was planned, it wasn't clear what the eventual needs would be, which were expected to differ. Indeed, loading everything into a generic tree representation in memory is not appropriate---we should prefer streaming and avoiding heap allocations when they’re not necessary, and we should parse into an IR rather than a generic format, which ensures that the data follow a proper grammar and are semantically valid. When parsing attributes in an isolated context became necessary for the aforementioned task, the state machine of the XIRT parser was modified to accommodate. The opposite approach should have been taken---instead of adding complexity and special cases to the parser, and from a complex parser extracting a simple one (an attribute parser), we should be composing the larger (full XIRT) parser from smaller ones (e.g. attribute, child elements). A combinator, when used in a functional sense, refers not to combinatory logic but to the composition of more complex systems from smaller ones. The changes made as part of this commit begin to work toward combinators, though it's not necessarily evident yet (to you, the reader) how that'll work, since the code for it hasn't yet been written; this is commit is simply getting my work thusfar introduced so I can do some light refactoring before continuing on it. TAMER does not aim to introduce a parser combinator framework in its usual sense---it favors, instead, striking a proper balance with Rust’s type system that permits the convenience of combinators only in situations where they are needed, to avoid having to write new parser boilerplate. Specifically: 1. Rust’s type system should be used as combinators, so that parsers are automatically constructed from the type definition. 2. Primitive parsers are written as explicit automata, not as primitive combinators. 3. Parsing should directly produce IRs as a lowering operation below XIRT, rather than producing XIRT itself. That is, target IRs should consume XIRT and produce parse themselves immediately, during streaming. In the future, if more combinators are needed, they will be added; maybe this will eventually evolve into a more generic parser combinator framework for TAME, but that is certainly a waste of time right now. And, to be honest, I’m hoping that won’t be necessary.
2021-12-06 11:26:53 -05:00
}
#[test]
fn returns_state_specific_error() {
// TestToken::Close causes EchoState to produce an error.
let errtok = TestToken::Close(DS);
tamer: xir:tree: Begin work on composable XIRT parser The XIRT parser was initially written for test cases, so that unit tests should assert more easily on generated token streams (XIR). While it was planned, it wasn't clear what the eventual needs would be, which were expected to differ. Indeed, loading everything into a generic tree representation in memory is not appropriate---we should prefer streaming and avoiding heap allocations when they’re not necessary, and we should parse into an IR rather than a generic format, which ensures that the data follow a proper grammar and are semantically valid. When parsing attributes in an isolated context became necessary for the aforementioned task, the state machine of the XIRT parser was modified to accommodate. The opposite approach should have been taken---instead of adding complexity and special cases to the parser, and from a complex parser extracting a simple one (an attribute parser), we should be composing the larger (full XIRT) parser from smaller ones (e.g. attribute, child elements). A combinator, when used in a functional sense, refers not to combinatory logic but to the composition of more complex systems from smaller ones. The changes made as part of this commit begin to work toward combinators, though it's not necessarily evident yet (to you, the reader) how that'll work, since the code for it hasn't yet been written; this is commit is simply getting my work thusfar introduced so I can do some light refactoring before continuing on it. TAMER does not aim to introduce a parser combinator framework in its usual sense---it favors, instead, striking a proper balance with Rust’s type system that permits the convenience of combinators only in situations where they are needed, to avoid having to write new parser boilerplate. Specifically: 1. Rust’s type system should be used as combinators, so that parsers are automatically constructed from the type definition. 2. Primitive parsers are written as explicit automata, not as primitive combinators. 3. Parsing should directly produce IRs as a lowering operation below XIRT, rather than producing XIRT itself. That is, target IRs should consume XIRT and produce parse themselves immediately, during streaming. In the future, if more combinators are needed, they will be added; maybe this will eventually evolve into a more generic parser combinator framework for TAME, but that is certainly a waste of time right now. And, to be honest, I’m hoping that won’t be necessary.
2021-12-06 11:26:53 -05:00
let mut toks = [errtok.clone()].into_iter();
let mut sut = Sut::from(&mut toks);
assert_eq!(
Some(Err(ParseError::StateError(EchoStateError::InnerError(
errtok
)))),
sut.next()
);
// The token must have been consumed.
// It is up to a recovery process to either bail out or provide
// recovery tokens;
// continuing without recovery is unlikely to make sense.
assert_eq!(0, toks.len());
}
#[test]
fn fails_when_parser_is_finalized_in_non_accepting_state() {
let span = Span::new(10, 10, "ctx".intern());
tamer: xir:tree: Begin work on composable XIRT parser The XIRT parser was initially written for test cases, so that unit tests should assert more easily on generated token streams (XIR). While it was planned, it wasn't clear what the eventual needs would be, which were expected to differ. Indeed, loading everything into a generic tree representation in memory is not appropriate---we should prefer streaming and avoiding heap allocations when they’re not necessary, and we should parse into an IR rather than a generic format, which ensures that the data follow a proper grammar and are semantically valid. When parsing attributes in an isolated context became necessary for the aforementioned task, the state machine of the XIRT parser was modified to accommodate. The opposite approach should have been taken---instead of adding complexity and special cases to the parser, and from a complex parser extracting a simple one (an attribute parser), we should be composing the larger (full XIRT) parser from smaller ones (e.g. attribute, child elements). A combinator, when used in a functional sense, refers not to combinatory logic but to the composition of more complex systems from smaller ones. The changes made as part of this commit begin to work toward combinators, though it's not necessarily evident yet (to you, the reader) how that'll work, since the code for it hasn't yet been written; this is commit is simply getting my work thusfar introduced so I can do some light refactoring before continuing on it. TAMER does not aim to introduce a parser combinator framework in its usual sense---it favors, instead, striking a proper balance with Rust’s type system that permits the convenience of combinators only in situations where they are needed, to avoid having to write new parser boilerplate. Specifically: 1. Rust’s type system should be used as combinators, so that parsers are automatically constructed from the type definition. 2. Primitive parsers are written as explicit automata, not as primitive combinators. 3. Parsing should directly produce IRs as a lowering operation below XIRT, rather than producing XIRT itself. That is, target IRs should consume XIRT and produce parse themselves immediately, during streaming. In the future, if more combinators are needed, they will be added; maybe this will eventually evolve into a more generic parser combinator framework for TAME, but that is certainly a waste of time right now. And, to be honest, I’m hoping that won’t be necessary.
2021-12-06 11:26:53 -05:00
// Set up so that we have a single token that we can use for
// recovery as part of the same iterator.
let recovery = TestToken::MarkDone(DS);
let mut toks = [
// Used purely to populate a Span.
TestToken::Close(span),
// Recovery token here:
recovery.clone(),
]
.into_iter();
tamer: xir:tree: Begin work on composable XIRT parser The XIRT parser was initially written for test cases, so that unit tests should assert more easily on generated token streams (XIR). While it was planned, it wasn't clear what the eventual needs would be, which were expected to differ. Indeed, loading everything into a generic tree representation in memory is not appropriate---we should prefer streaming and avoiding heap allocations when they’re not necessary, and we should parse into an IR rather than a generic format, which ensures that the data follow a proper grammar and are semantically valid. When parsing attributes in an isolated context became necessary for the aforementioned task, the state machine of the XIRT parser was modified to accommodate. The opposite approach should have been taken---instead of adding complexity and special cases to the parser, and from a complex parser extracting a simple one (an attribute parser), we should be composing the larger (full XIRT) parser from smaller ones (e.g. attribute, child elements). A combinator, when used in a functional sense, refers not to combinatory logic but to the composition of more complex systems from smaller ones. The changes made as part of this commit begin to work toward combinators, though it's not necessarily evident yet (to you, the reader) how that'll work, since the code for it hasn't yet been written; this is commit is simply getting my work thusfar introduced so I can do some light refactoring before continuing on it. TAMER does not aim to introduce a parser combinator framework in its usual sense---it favors, instead, striking a proper balance with Rust’s type system that permits the convenience of combinators only in situations where they are needed, to avoid having to write new parser boilerplate. Specifically: 1. Rust’s type system should be used as combinators, so that parsers are automatically constructed from the type definition. 2. Primitive parsers are written as explicit automata, not as primitive combinators. 3. Parsing should directly produce IRs as a lowering operation below XIRT, rather than producing XIRT itself. That is, target IRs should consume XIRT and produce parse themselves immediately, during streaming. In the future, if more combinators are needed, they will be added; maybe this will eventually evolve into a more generic parser combinator framework for TAME, but that is certainly a waste of time right now. And, to be honest, I’m hoping that won’t be necessary.
2021-12-06 11:26:53 -05:00
let mut sut = Sut::from(&mut toks);
// Populate our most recently seen token's span.
sut.next();
tamer: xir:tree: Begin work on composable XIRT parser The XIRT parser was initially written for test cases, so that unit tests should assert more easily on generated token streams (XIR). While it was planned, it wasn't clear what the eventual needs would be, which were expected to differ. Indeed, loading everything into a generic tree representation in memory is not appropriate---we should prefer streaming and avoiding heap allocations when they’re not necessary, and we should parse into an IR rather than a generic format, which ensures that the data follow a proper grammar and are semantically valid. When parsing attributes in an isolated context became necessary for the aforementioned task, the state machine of the XIRT parser was modified to accommodate. The opposite approach should have been taken---instead of adding complexity and special cases to the parser, and from a complex parser extracting a simple one (an attribute parser), we should be composing the larger (full XIRT) parser from smaller ones (e.g. attribute, child elements). A combinator, when used in a functional sense, refers not to combinatory logic but to the composition of more complex systems from smaller ones. The changes made as part of this commit begin to work toward combinators, though it's not necessarily evident yet (to you, the reader) how that'll work, since the code for it hasn't yet been written; this is commit is simply getting my work thusfar introduced so I can do some light refactoring before continuing on it. TAMER does not aim to introduce a parser combinator framework in its usual sense---it favors, instead, striking a proper balance with Rust’s type system that permits the convenience of combinators only in situations where they are needed, to avoid having to write new parser boilerplate. Specifically: 1. Rust’s type system should be used as combinators, so that parsers are automatically constructed from the type definition. 2. Primitive parsers are written as explicit automata, not as primitive combinators. 3. Parsing should directly produce IRs as a lowering operation below XIRT, rather than producing XIRT itself. That is, target IRs should consume XIRT and produce parse themselves immediately, during streaming. In the future, if more combinators are needed, they will be added; maybe this will eventually evolve into a more generic parser combinator framework for TAME, but that is certainly a waste of time right now. And, to be honest, I’m hoping that won’t be necessary.
2021-12-06 11:26:53 -05:00
// Attempting to finalize now in a non-accepting state should fail
// in the same way that encountering an end-of-stream does,
// since we're effectively saying "we're done with the stream"
// and the parser will have no further opportunity to reach an
// accepting state.
let result = sut.finalize();
assert_matches!(
result,
Err((_, FinalizeError::UnexpectedEof(s, _)))
if s == span.endpoints().1.unwrap()
);
tamer: xir:tree: Begin work on composable XIRT parser The XIRT parser was initially written for test cases, so that unit tests should assert more easily on generated token streams (XIR). While it was planned, it wasn't clear what the eventual needs would be, which were expected to differ. Indeed, loading everything into a generic tree representation in memory is not appropriate---we should prefer streaming and avoiding heap allocations when they’re not necessary, and we should parse into an IR rather than a generic format, which ensures that the data follow a proper grammar and are semantically valid. When parsing attributes in an isolated context became necessary for the aforementioned task, the state machine of the XIRT parser was modified to accommodate. The opposite approach should have been taken---instead of adding complexity and special cases to the parser, and from a complex parser extracting a simple one (an attribute parser), we should be composing the larger (full XIRT) parser from smaller ones (e.g. attribute, child elements). A combinator, when used in a functional sense, refers not to combinatory logic but to the composition of more complex systems from smaller ones. The changes made as part of this commit begin to work toward combinators, though it's not necessarily evident yet (to you, the reader) how that'll work, since the code for it hasn't yet been written; this is commit is simply getting my work thusfar introduced so I can do some light refactoring before continuing on it. TAMER does not aim to introduce a parser combinator framework in its usual sense---it favors, instead, striking a proper balance with Rust’s type system that permits the convenience of combinators only in situations where they are needed, to avoid having to write new parser boilerplate. Specifically: 1. Rust’s type system should be used as combinators, so that parsers are automatically constructed from the type definition. 2. Primitive parsers are written as explicit automata, not as primitive combinators. 3. Parsing should directly produce IRs as a lowering operation below XIRT, rather than producing XIRT itself. That is, target IRs should consume XIRT and produce parse themselves immediately, during streaming. In the future, if more combinators are needed, they will be added; maybe this will eventually evolve into a more generic parser combinator framework for TAME, but that is certainly a waste of time right now. And, to be honest, I’m hoping that won’t be necessary.
2021-12-06 11:26:53 -05:00
// The sut should have been re-returned,
// allowing for attempted error recovery if the caller can manage
// to produce a sequence of tokens that will be considered valid.
// `toks` above is set up already for this,
// which allows us to assert that we received back the same `sut`.
let mut sut = result.unwrap_err().0;
assert_eq!(Some(Ok(Parsed::Object(recovery))), sut.next());
tamer: xir:tree: Begin work on composable XIRT parser The XIRT parser was initially written for test cases, so that unit tests should assert more easily on generated token streams (XIR). While it was planned, it wasn't clear what the eventual needs would be, which were expected to differ. Indeed, loading everything into a generic tree representation in memory is not appropriate---we should prefer streaming and avoiding heap allocations when they’re not necessary, and we should parse into an IR rather than a generic format, which ensures that the data follow a proper grammar and are semantically valid. When parsing attributes in an isolated context became necessary for the aforementioned task, the state machine of the XIRT parser was modified to accommodate. The opposite approach should have been taken---instead of adding complexity and special cases to the parser, and from a complex parser extracting a simple one (an attribute parser), we should be composing the larger (full XIRT) parser from smaller ones (e.g. attribute, child elements). A combinator, when used in a functional sense, refers not to combinatory logic but to the composition of more complex systems from smaller ones. The changes made as part of this commit begin to work toward combinators, though it's not necessarily evident yet (to you, the reader) how that'll work, since the code for it hasn't yet been written; this is commit is simply getting my work thusfar introduced so I can do some light refactoring before continuing on it. TAMER does not aim to introduce a parser combinator framework in its usual sense---it favors, instead, striking a proper balance with Rust’s type system that permits the convenience of combinators only in situations where they are needed, to avoid having to write new parser boilerplate. Specifically: 1. Rust’s type system should be used as combinators, so that parsers are automatically constructed from the type definition. 2. Primitive parsers are written as explicit automata, not as primitive combinators. 3. Parsing should directly produce IRs as a lowering operation below XIRT, rather than producing XIRT itself. That is, target IRs should consume XIRT and produce parse themselves immediately, during streaming. In the future, if more combinators are needed, they will be added; maybe this will eventually evolve into a more generic parser combinator framework for TAME, but that is certainly a waste of time right now. And, to be honest, I’m hoping that won’t be necessary.
2021-12-06 11:26:53 -05:00
// And so we should now be in an accepting state,
// able to finalize.
assert!(sut.finalize().is_ok());
}
tamer: xir::tree: Integrate AttrParserState into Stack Note that AttrParse{r=>}State needs renaming, and Stack will get a better name down the line too. This commit message is accurate, but confusing. This performs the long-awaited task of trying to observe, concretely, how to combine two automata. This has the effect of stitching together the state machines, such that the union of the two is equivalent to the original monolith. The next step will be to abstract this away. There are some important things to note here. First, this introduces a new "dead" state concept, where here a dead state is defined as an _accepting_ state that has no state transitions for the given input token. This is more strict than a dead state as defined in, for example, the Dragon Book, where backtracking may occur. The reason I chose for a Dead state to be accepting is simple: it represents a lookahead situation. It says, "I don't know what this token is, but I've done my job, so it may be useful in a parent context". The "I've done my job" part is only applicable in an accepting state. If the parser is _not_ in an accepting state, then an unknown token is simply an error; we should _not_ try to backtrack or anything of the sort, because we want only a single token of lookahead. The reason this was done is because it's otherwise difficult to compose the two parsers without requiring that AttrEnd exist in every XIR stream; this has always been an awkward delimiter that was introduced to make the parser LL(0), but I tried to compromise by saying that it was optional. Of course, I knew that decision caused awkward inconsistencies, I had just hoped that those inconsistencies wouldn't manifest in practical issues. Well, now it did, and the benefits of AttrEnd that we had in the previous construction do not exist in this one. Consequently, it makes more sense to simply go from LL(0) to LL(1), which makes AttrEnd unnecessary, and a future commit will remove it entirely. All of this information will be documented, but I want to get further in the implementation first to make sure I don't change course again and therefore waste my time on docs. DEV-11268
2021-12-16 09:44:02 -05:00
#[test]
fn unhandled_dead_state_results_in_error() {
// A Text will cause our parser to return Dead.
let tok = TestToken::Text(DS);
tamer: xir::tree: Integrate AttrParserState into Stack Note that AttrParse{r=>}State needs renaming, and Stack will get a better name down the line too. This commit message is accurate, but confusing. This performs the long-awaited task of trying to observe, concretely, how to combine two automata. This has the effect of stitching together the state machines, such that the union of the two is equivalent to the original monolith. The next step will be to abstract this away. There are some important things to note here. First, this introduces a new "dead" state concept, where here a dead state is defined as an _accepting_ state that has no state transitions for the given input token. This is more strict than a dead state as defined in, for example, the Dragon Book, where backtracking may occur. The reason I chose for a Dead state to be accepting is simple: it represents a lookahead situation. It says, "I don't know what this token is, but I've done my job, so it may be useful in a parent context". The "I've done my job" part is only applicable in an accepting state. If the parser is _not_ in an accepting state, then an unknown token is simply an error; we should _not_ try to backtrack or anything of the sort, because we want only a single token of lookahead. The reason this was done is because it's otherwise difficult to compose the two parsers without requiring that AttrEnd exist in every XIR stream; this has always been an awkward delimiter that was introduced to make the parser LL(0), but I tried to compromise by saying that it was optional. Of course, I knew that decision caused awkward inconsistencies, I had just hoped that those inconsistencies wouldn't manifest in practical issues. Well, now it did, and the benefits of AttrEnd that we had in the previous construction do not exist in this one. Consequently, it makes more sense to simply go from LL(0) to LL(1), which makes AttrEnd unnecessary, and a future commit will remove it entirely. All of this information will be documented, but I want to get further in the implementation first to make sure I don't change course again and therefore waste my time on docs. DEV-11268
2021-12-16 09:44:02 -05:00
let mut toks = once(tok.clone());
let mut sut = Sut::from(&mut toks);
// Our parser returns a Dead status,
// which is unhandled by any parent context
// (since we're not composing parsers),
// which causes an error due to an unhandled Dead state.
assert_eq!(
sut.next(),
Some(Err(ParseError::UnexpectedToken(
tok,
EchoState::default().to_string()
))),
);
tamer: xir::tree: Integrate AttrParserState into Stack Note that AttrParse{r=>}State needs renaming, and Stack will get a better name down the line too. This commit message is accurate, but confusing. This performs the long-awaited task of trying to observe, concretely, how to combine two automata. This has the effect of stitching together the state machines, such that the union of the two is equivalent to the original monolith. The next step will be to abstract this away. There are some important things to note here. First, this introduces a new "dead" state concept, where here a dead state is defined as an _accepting_ state that has no state transitions for the given input token. This is more strict than a dead state as defined in, for example, the Dragon Book, where backtracking may occur. The reason I chose for a Dead state to be accepting is simple: it represents a lookahead situation. It says, "I don't know what this token is, but I've done my job, so it may be useful in a parent context". The "I've done my job" part is only applicable in an accepting state. If the parser is _not_ in an accepting state, then an unknown token is simply an error; we should _not_ try to backtrack or anything of the sort, because we want only a single token of lookahead. The reason this was done is because it's otherwise difficult to compose the two parsers without requiring that AttrEnd exist in every XIR stream; this has always been an awkward delimiter that was introduced to make the parser LL(0), but I tried to compromise by saying that it was optional. Of course, I knew that decision caused awkward inconsistencies, I had just hoped that those inconsistencies wouldn't manifest in practical issues. Well, now it did, and the benefits of AttrEnd that we had in the previous construction do not exist in this one. Consequently, it makes more sense to simply go from LL(0) to LL(1), which makes AttrEnd unnecessary, and a future commit will remove it entirely. All of this information will be documented, but I want to get further in the implementation first to make sure I don't change course again and therefore waste my time on docs. DEV-11268
2021-12-16 09:44:02 -05:00
}
// A context can be both retrieved from a finished parser and provided
// to a new one.
#[test]
fn provide_and_retrieve_context() {
// First, verify that it's initialized to a default context.
let mut toks = vec![TestToken::MarkDone(DS)].into_iter();
let mut sut = Sut::from(&mut toks);
sut.next().unwrap().unwrap();
let ctx = sut.finalize().unwrap().into_context();
assert_eq!(ctx, Default::default());
// Next, verify that the context that is manipulated is the context
// that is returned to us.
let val = 5;
let mut toks = vec![TestToken::SetCtxVal(5)].into_iter();
let mut sut = Sut::from(&mut toks);
sut.next().unwrap().unwrap();
let ctx = sut.finalize().unwrap().into_context();
assert_eq!(ctx, StubContext { val });
// Finally, verify that the context provided is the context that is
// used.
let val = 10;
let given_ctx = StubContext { val };
let mut toks = vec![TestToken::MarkDone(DS)].into_iter();
let mut sut = EchoState::parse_with_context(&mut toks, given_ctx);
sut.next().unwrap().unwrap();
let ctx = sut.finalize().unwrap().into_context();
assert_eq!(ctx, StubContext { val });
}
// This healthy block of mostly-boilerplate verifies that the practical
// use case of the trampoline system actually type-checks,
// and was used during development as a simpler example than having
// to content with the mammoth `ele_parse!`.
// There is no runtime test;
// it will fail to compile if there's a problem.
mod superst {
use crate::span::dummy::S1;
use super::*;
#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq)]
enum Sup {
SubA(SubA),
SubB(SubB),
}
#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq)]
enum SubA {
A,
}
#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq)]
enum SubB {
B,
}
impl Display for Sup {
fn fmt(&self, _f: &mut std::fmt::Formatter) -> std::fmt::Result {
unimplemented!()
}
}
impl Display for SubA {
fn fmt(&self, _f: &mut std::fmt::Formatter) -> std::fmt::Result {
unimplemented!()
}
}
impl Display for SubB {
fn fmt(&self, _f: &mut std::fmt::Formatter) -> std::fmt::Result {
unimplemented!()
}
}
impl From<SubA> for Sup {
fn from(sub: SubA) -> Self {
Self::SubA(sub)
}
}
impl From<SubB> for Sup {
fn from(sub: SubB) -> Self {
Self::SubB(sub)
}
}
#[derive(Debug, PartialEq)]
enum SupError {
SubA(SubAError),
SubB(SubBError),
}
#[derive(Debug, PartialEq)]
enum SubAError {}
#[derive(Debug, PartialEq)]
enum SubBError {}
impl Error for SupError {
fn source(&self) -> Option<&(dyn Error + 'static)> {
None
}
}
impl Display for SupError {
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut std::fmt::Formatter) -> std::fmt::Result {
write!(f, "SupError")
}
}
impl Diagnostic for SupError {
fn describe(&self) -> Vec<AnnotatedSpan> {
vec![]
}
}
impl Error for SubAError {
fn source(&self) -> Option<&(dyn Error + 'static)> {
None
}
}
impl Display for SubAError {
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut std::fmt::Formatter) -> std::fmt::Result {
write!(f, "SubAError")
}
}
impl Diagnostic for SubAError {
fn describe(&self) -> Vec<AnnotatedSpan> {
vec![]
}
}
impl Error for SubBError {
fn source(&self) -> Option<&(dyn Error + 'static)> {
None
}
}
impl Display for SubBError {
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut std::fmt::Formatter) -> std::fmt::Result {
write!(f, "SubBError")
}
}
impl Diagnostic for SubBError {
fn describe(&self) -> Vec<AnnotatedSpan> {
vec![]
}
}
impl From<SubAError> for SupError {
fn from(sub: SubAError) -> Self {
Self::SubA(sub)
}
}
impl From<SubBError> for SupError {
fn from(sub: SubBError) -> Self {
Self::SubB(sub)
}
}
#[allow(dead_code)] // Used only for type checking atm.
#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq)]
enum SupToken {
ToA,
ToB,
}
impl Token for SupToken {
fn ir_name() -> &'static str {
"SupTest"
}
fn span(&self) -> Span {
S1
}
}
impl Display for SupToken {
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut std::fmt::Formatter) -> std::fmt::Result {
write!(f, "SupToken")
}
}
#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq)]
enum SupObject {
FromA(SupToken),
FromB(SupToken),
}
impl Object for SupObject {}
impl ParseState for Sup {
type Token = SupToken;
type Object = SupObject;
type Error = SupError;
fn parse_token(
self,
tok: Self::Token,
ctx: &mut Self::Context,
) -> TransitionResult<Self> {
match self {
Self::SubA(st) => st.parse_token(tok, ctx),
Self::SubB(st) => st.parse_token(tok, ctx),
}
}
fn is_accepting(&self, _: &Self::Context) -> bool {
true
}
}
impl ParseState for SubA {
type Token = SupToken;
type Object = SupObject;
type Error = SubAError;
type Super = Sup;
fn parse_token(
self,
tok: Self::Token,
_ctx: &mut Self::Context,
) -> TransitionResult<Self::Super> {
match tok {
SupToken::ToA => Transition(self).ok(SupObject::FromA(tok)),
SupToken::ToB => {
Transition(SubB::B).ok(SupObject::FromA(tok))
}
}
}
fn is_accepting(&self, _: &Self::Context) -> bool {
true
}
}
impl ParseState for SubB {
type Token = SupToken;
type Object = SupObject;
type Error = SubBError;
type Super = Sup;
fn parse_token(
self,
tok: Self::Token,
_ctx: &mut Self::Context,
) -> TransitionResult<Self::Super> {
match tok {
SupToken::ToA => Transition(self).ok(SupObject::FromB(tok)),
SupToken::ToB => {
Transition(SubA::A).ok(SupObject::FromB(tok))
}
}
}
fn is_accepting(&self, _: &Self::Context) -> bool {
true
}
}
}
tamer: xir:tree: Begin work on composable XIRT parser The XIRT parser was initially written for test cases, so that unit tests should assert more easily on generated token streams (XIR). While it was planned, it wasn't clear what the eventual needs would be, which were expected to differ. Indeed, loading everything into a generic tree representation in memory is not appropriate---we should prefer streaming and avoiding heap allocations when they’re not necessary, and we should parse into an IR rather than a generic format, which ensures that the data follow a proper grammar and are semantically valid. When parsing attributes in an isolated context became necessary for the aforementioned task, the state machine of the XIRT parser was modified to accommodate. The opposite approach should have been taken---instead of adding complexity and special cases to the parser, and from a complex parser extracting a simple one (an attribute parser), we should be composing the larger (full XIRT) parser from smaller ones (e.g. attribute, child elements). A combinator, when used in a functional sense, refers not to combinatory logic but to the composition of more complex systems from smaller ones. The changes made as part of this commit begin to work toward combinators, though it's not necessarily evident yet (to you, the reader) how that'll work, since the code for it hasn't yet been written; this is commit is simply getting my work thusfar introduced so I can do some light refactoring before continuing on it. TAMER does not aim to introduce a parser combinator framework in its usual sense---it favors, instead, striking a proper balance with Rust’s type system that permits the convenience of combinators only in situations where they are needed, to avoid having to write new parser boilerplate. Specifically: 1. Rust’s type system should be used as combinators, so that parsers are automatically constructed from the type definition. 2. Primitive parsers are written as explicit automata, not as primitive combinators. 3. Parsing should directly produce IRs as a lowering operation below XIRT, rather than producing XIRT itself. That is, target IRs should consume XIRT and produce parse themselves immediately, during streaming. In the future, if more combinators are needed, they will be added; maybe this will eventually evolve into a more generic parser combinator framework for TAME, but that is certainly a waste of time right now. And, to be honest, I’m hoping that won’t be necessary.
2021-12-06 11:26:53 -05:00
}