1
0
Fork 0
easejs/test/Class/ConstructorTest.js

298 lines
9.0 KiB
JavaScript

/**
* Tests class module constructor creation
*
* Copyright (C) 2014, 2015, 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
*
* This file is part of GNU ease.js.
*
* ease.js is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
* the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
* (at your option) any later version.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
* along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*/
require( 'common' ).testCase(
{
caseSetUp: function()
{
// ease.js was written long before ES6 drafts began providing class
// support. Now that they do, we should support their constructor
// decision as well as our own.
this.ctors = [ '__construct', 'constructor' ];
// we only use ES3 features, thus this
this.mkctor = function( name, f )
{
var o = {};
o[ name ] = f;
return o;
};
},
setUp: function()
{
this.Sut = this.require( 'class' );
},
/**
* As a sanity check, ensure that the constructor is not invoked upon
* defining the class. (Note that the case of ensuring that it is not
* called when creating a subtype is handled by the ExtendTest case.)
*/
'@each(ctors) Should not be invoked before instantiation':
function( name )
{
var called = false,
dfn = {};
this.Sut.extend(
this.mkctor( name, function() { called = true; } )
);
this.assertNotEqual( called, true );
},
/**
* Since __construct is a special method that is not recognized by
* ECMAScript itself, we must ensure that it is invoked when the class
* is instantiated. Further, it should only be called a single time,
* which is particularly important if it produces side-effects.
*/
'@each(ctors) Should be invoked once upon instantiation':
function( name )
{
var called = 0;
var Foo = this.Sut.extend(
this.mkctor( name, function() { called++; } )
);
// note that we're not yet testing the more consise new-less
// invocation style
new Foo();
this.assertEqual( called, 1 );
},
/**
* Once invoked, the __construct method should be bound to the newly
* created instance.
*/
'@each(ctors) Should be invoked within context of new instance':
function( name )
{
var expected = Math.random();
var dfn = this.mkctor( name, function()
{
this.val = expected;
} );
dfn.val = null;
var Foo = this.Sut.extend( dfn );
// if `this' was bound to the instance, then __construct should set
// VAL to EXPECTED
var inst = new Foo();
this.assertEqual( inst.val, expected );
},
/**
* All arguments passed to the constructor (that is, by invoking the
* ``class'') should be passed to __construct, unchanged and
* uncopied---that is, references should be retained.
*/
'@each(ctors) Arguments should be passed unchanged to __construct':
function( name )
{
var args = [ "foo", { bar: 'baz' }, [ 'moo', 'cow' ] ],
given = null;
var Foo = this.Sut.extend(
this.mkctor( name, function()
{
given = Array.prototype.slice.call( arguments, 0 );
} )
);
new Foo( args[ 0 ], args[ 1 ], args[ 2 ] );
// make sure we have everything and didn't get anything extra
this.assertEqual( given.length, args.length );
var i = args.length;
while ( i-- )
{
this.assertStrictEqual( given[ i ], args[ i ],
"Ctor argument mismatch: " + i
);
}
},
/**
* If a subtype does not define its own constructor, then its parent's
* should be called by default. Note that this behavior---as is clear by
* the name __construct---is modelled after PHP; Java classes, for
* instance, do not inherit their parents' constructors.
*/
'@each(ctors)Parent constructor invoked for subtype if not overridden':
function( name )
{
var called = false;
var dfn = {};
dfn[ name ] = function() { called = true; };
var Sub = this.Sut.extend( dfn )
.extend( {} );
new Sub();
this.assertOk( called );
},
/**
* Classes created through ease.js do not require use of the `new'
* keyword, which allows for a much more natural, concise, and less
* error-prone syntax. Ensure that a new instance is created even when
* it is omitted.
*
* The rest of the tests above would then stand, since they use the
* `new' keyword and this concise format has no choice but to ultimately
* do the same; otherwise, it would not be recognized by instanceof.
*/
'Constructor does not require `new\' keyword': function()
{
var Foo = this.Sut.extend( {} );
this.assertOk( new Foo() instanceof Foo ); // sanity check
this.assertOk( Foo() instanceof Foo );
},
/**
* In certain OO languages, one would prevent a class from being
* instantiated by declaring the constructor as protected or private. To
* me (Mike Gerwitz), this is cryptic. A better method would simply be
* to throw an exception. Perhaps, in the future, an alternative will be
* provided for consistency.
*
* The constructor must be public. (It is for this reason that you will
* often see the convention of omitting visibility keywords entirely for
* __construct, since public is the default and there is no other
* option.)
*/
'@each(ctors) Constructor must be public': function( name )
{
var Sut = this.Sut;
this.assertThrows( function()
{
var dfn = {};
dfn[ 'protected ' + name ] = function() {};
Sut( dfn );
}, TypeError, "Constructor should not be able to be protected" );
this.assertThrows( function()
{
var dfn = {};
dfn[ 'private ' + name ] = function() {};
Sut( dfn );
}, TypeError, "Constructor should not be able to be private" );
},
/**
* This one is a bit of an interesting case. Information can be found
* in the manual, but for the sake of this test, all we need to know is
* that we should be able to override `__construct' without having
* provided the `virtual' keyword on the supertype. This differs from
* all other methods which are non-virtual by default.
*/
'@each(ctors) Constructor is virtual by default': function( name )
{
var _self = this;
this.assertDoesNotThrow( function()
{
var sub_called = false;
// not explicitly virtual
var base_dfn = {};
base_dfn[ name ] = function() {};
var sub_dfn = {};
sub_dfn[ 'override ' + name ] = function()
{
sub_called = true;
};
_self.Sut.extend( _self.Sut( base_dfn ), sub_dfn )();
// sanity check
_self.assertOk( sub_called );
}, Error );
},
/**
* When a constructor is instantiated conventionally in ECMAScript, the
* instance's `constructor' property is set to the constructor that was
* used to instantiate it. The same should be true for class instances.
*
* This will also be important for reflection.
*/
'`constructor\' property is properly set to class object': function()
{
var Foo = this.Sut.extend( {} );
this.assertStrictEqual( Foo().constructor, Foo );
},
/**
* We support multiple constructor styles; only one may be provided.
*
* This error should happen as a consequence of other method checks that
* prohibit redefinitions.
*/
'Cannot provide multiple constructor styles': function()
{
var Sut = this.Sut,
len = this.ctors.length;
// this will not test every permutation, but will hopefully be a
// reasonable test in the event that any additional constructors are
// added in the future (we start at 1 because it'll wrap modulo LEN)
for ( var i = 1; i < len; i++ )
{
var dfn = {},
a = this.ctors[ i ],
b = this.ctors[ ( i + 1 ) % len ];
dfn[ a ] = function() {};
dfn[ b ] = function() {};
this.assertThrows( function()
{
Sut( dfn );
}, Error, "Multiple constructors should not be permitted" );
}
},
} );