79d0c4a62c
[ #25 ] Began moving test-class-implement over to new test case system
2011-11-02 22:32:45 -04:00
f15fa03a3b
[ #25 ] Began moving test-class-visibility over to new test case style
2011-11-02 22:04:53 -04:00
48dbfea990
[ #25 ] Began moving test-class_builder-visibility over to new test case format
2011-11-02 21:37:28 -04:00
de78a472f0
[ #25 ] MemberBuilder/MethodTest - removed unnecessary test
2011-11-02 19:12:15 -04:00
110d937838
[ #25 ] Began converting test-class_builder-const to test case
...
- Not yet renaming, as the conversion is not yet complete
2011-11-02 19:11:12 -04:00
a0ba2feb33
[ #25 ] Removed transfered tests from test-class_builder-const
2011-10-30 14:22:17 -04:00
b063a91e40
[ #25 ] Added visibility de-escalation and escalation tests to MemberBuilderValidator for getters/setters
2011-10-30 12:06:09 -04:00
91332353e9
[ #25 ] Added attachInstanceOf TODO
2011-10-30 11:56:54 -04:00
08cb663833
[ #25 ] Refactored quickVisChangeTest to share code between each of the member test cases
2011-10-29 10:08:08 -04:00
3c676de55d
[ #25 ] Combined buildGetter() and buildSetter()
...
This helped to get rid of some unnecessary duplicate code and should also help
to improve performance slightly for getter/setter definitions.
2011-10-29 08:25:51 -04:00
02cd52cfb7
[ #25 ] Began refactoring getter/setter building into a single method (util.propParse)
...
I'm unsure as to why I originally placed them in separate methods. propParse() will
always find a getter at the same time it finds a setter, and vice versa, should they
both have been defined on the object.
2011-10-29 08:08:02 -04:00
2ba8e2c8f0
[ #25 ] Refactored common getter/setter code into common method within MemberBuilder
2011-10-29 07:47:22 -04:00
8433511f56
[ #25 ] Added visibility [de-]escalation tests for properties
2011-10-28 20:22:53 -04:00
31a7980e37
[ #25 ] Moved bulk of visibility escalation test into common file to be shared with other member tests
2011-10-28 20:22:14 -04:00
93021f3dbc
[ #25 ] Moved getter/setter validation tests into new test case
...
Much more elegant a test case now.
2011-10-28 00:22:50 -04:00
ad0343fb9b
[ #25 ] Moved getter/setter validation logic into MemberBuilderValidator
...
- Tests have not yet been moved
2011-10-28 00:08:22 -04:00
05df0b485c
[ #25 ] Moved single access modifier getter/setter test to VisibilityTest
2011-10-27 20:46:30 -04:00
f19a62e733
[ #25 ] Moved public default getter/setter test to new location
2011-10-27 20:43:56 -04:00
a959e99b06
[ #25 ] Removed replaced vis tests from test-emmber_builder-gettersetter
2011-10-27 19:53:43 -04:00
5959956a27
[ #25 ] this => _self replacements in MemberBuilder/VisibilityTest
2011-10-27 19:52:43 -04:00
11020a9d2a
[ #25 ] Minor typo fix in MemberBuilder/VisibilityTest
2011-10-27 19:51:28 -04:00
1ba160e51c
[ #25 ] Added getter/setter vis test to MemberBuilder/VisibilityTest
2011-10-27 19:50:13 -04:00
ce7853965e
[ #25 ] Combined separate property and method vis test
2011-10-27 19:28:36 -04:00
6d1cc06c27
[ #25 ] Finished refactoring MemberBuilder/MethodTest and removed inc-member_builder-common (no longer needed)
...
Finally feels like things are starting to come together.
It's rather interesting looking back. Each time I begin writing a piece of
software, I think to myself, "This is the best way to do it." Well, generally.
Perhaps the implementation could have been better, but I may not have had the
time. However, the general concept remains.
Each time I look back months later and find that I disagree with certain
decisions. I find certain implementations to be messy or poorly constructed. Or
perhaps I was just being lazy to begin with. Whatever the case, it is
comforting. It shows that one is continuing to learn and evolve.
Now, in the case of ease.js, we're working with a number of different factors in
regards to my perception of prior code quality. Primarily, I'm looking at a
basic implementation (in this case, I'm referring to test cases) that served as
a foundation that could be later evolved. I didn't have the time to devote to a
stronger solution. However, since the project has evolved so far past my
original expectations, a more sophisticated solution is needed in order to
simplify the overall design. That is what happened here.
Of course, we're also looking at a year's worth of additional, intimate
experience with a language.
Regardless of the reason, I love to see software evolve. Especially my own. It's
as if I'm watching my child grow. From that, I can get a great deal of
satisfaction.
One shouldn't expect perfection. But one should certainly aim for it.
2011-10-26 23:39:03 -04:00
88cff48599
[ #25 ] Moved remaining tests in test-member_builder into MemberBuilder/VisibilityTest
2011-10-26 22:12:28 -04:00
2d494d577e
[ #25 ] Removed test-member_builder-prop; all tests have been moved
2011-10-26 00:03:26 -04:00
e90699c805
[ #25 ] Added test to MemberBuilder/Visibility test to ensure members will be declared public by default (if no access modifier is given)
2011-10-25 23:47:06 -04:00
f4b8eb3589
[ #25 ] Added test in MemberBuilder/VisibilityTest to ensure multiple access modifiers are not used
2011-10-25 23:30:57 -04:00
3482eb4cd7
[ #25 ] Removed method hiding test (can restore when reimplementing)
2011-10-25 22:29:03 -04:00
625f62bbf1
[ #25 ] Moved MemberBuilderValidator property tests into new test case
2011-10-23 01:14:13 -04:00
6fc3d05166
[ #25 ] Moved quick keyword validation into shared MemberBuilderValidator test module
2011-10-23 01:11:09 -04:00
a91cb01998
[ #25 ] Moved MethodBuilder property validation into MemberBuilderValidator
...
- Tests have not yet been moved
2011-10-23 00:43:08 -04:00
5e46298e39
[ #25 ] Moved MemberBuilderValidator's quickFailureTest into its own file to share with upcoming property tests
2011-10-23 00:27:25 -04:00
0d0372cb87
[ #25 ] Adding proper dirname to combined tests
2011-10-23 00:22:43 -04:00
9b629b8b61
[ #25 ] Removed tests from MemberBuilder/MethodTest that have been refactored into MemberBuilderValidator/MethodTest
2011-10-23 00:06:22 -04:00
9fe26e7582
[ #25 ] Moved MemberBuilderValidator/MethodTest's helper functions into caseSetUp()
2011-10-22 16:49:51 -04:00
2da2247c86
[ #25 ] Added successful test to MemberBuilderValidator's method tests to ensure successful functionality is also tested
2011-10-22 16:47:09 -04:00
8ebcc3f1b3
[ #25 ] Removed duplicate code from MemberBuilderValidator method test
2011-10-22 16:37:58 -04:00
cf99aa88e8
[ #25 ] Added README.todo
2011-10-22 16:32:55 -04:00
a5e2a507f2
[ #25 ] Throwing error instead of method hiding; will implement in future
2011-10-22 13:57:17 -04:00
6e7e031ff9
[ #25 ] [ #25 ] Re-added accidently removed portion of test
2011-10-22 11:06:03 -04:00
f9b951ddb2
[ #25 ] [ #25 ] Began moving MemberBuilder validation rules into MemberBuilderValidator (moved method rules)
2011-10-22 01:00:45 -04:00
e6830b741f
[ #25 ] Now using keywords to compare visibility levels in validations to eliminiate fallback inconsistencies
...
Ironic, considering the current refactoring (not yet committed) of MemberBuilder to split validation logic into MemberBuilderValidator was partially to be able to easily override the fallback logic. It's a useful refactoring nonetheless, but it could have waited.
2011-10-22 00:32:59 -04:00
f6369ba2c4
[ #25 ] No longer using util.isAbstractMethod() for method validation
2011-10-22 00:13:51 -04:00
4d2d95a99f
[ #25 ] Added test case error output for browser
2011-10-21 16:04:27 -04:00
aeff796332
[ #25 ] [ #25 ] Added member builder tests for private and protected members
2011-10-21 16:04:24 -04:00
ea972bdffc
[ #25 ] Added ability to manually increment assertion count for custom assertions
2011-10-21 12:10:53 -04:00
9ea60a18b0
[ #25 ] Added assertion count to testcase output
2011-10-21 12:10:53 -04:00
f7700f93e5
[ #25 ] Refactored MemberBuilder/VisibilityTest basic tests into reusable functions for upcoming tests in other access levels
2011-10-21 12:10:49 -04:00
bb9eb16fd3
[ #25 ] Began adding MemberBuilder/VisibilityTest to test MemberBuilder directly
...
As mentioned in a prior commit blog-like entry, many of the tests evolved into more of an integration or system-level type of test. Let's get away from that.
2011-10-21 12:09:00 -04:00
Mike Gerwitz