2569dacf15
Override keyword is now required to override a virtual method ( #19 )
2011-08-04 00:32:10 -04:00
db18a61d30
[ #19 ] Began implementing method hiding (added warning for implicit hiding)
2011-07-06 19:35:00 -04:00
8b83e85c43
[ #19 ] Implemented 'virtual' keyword
...
- Baby steps. 'override' keyword is not yet necessary.
- Final not yet removed
2011-06-08 01:11:53 -04:00
63a4f95f65
Fix for overriding protected with protected
...
- A better solution may be explored
2011-04-13 14:48:20 -04:00
1abf127ccc
Protected property values, when set by the parent, are now available to subtypes
2011-04-02 10:58:26 -04:00
61f2f7e22d
Methods can now be properly overridden when visibility is escalated
2011-04-01 06:28:45 -04:00
7070e55254
Added test to ensure same visibility de-escalation rules apply to concrete implementations of Interface methods
2011-03-18 23:55:56 -04:00
10ef0b2139
Added test to ensure __super() works properly with protected method overrides
2011-03-18 23:49:28 -04:00
ce736bea55
Visibility de-escalation no longer permitted
2011-03-18 23:42:07 -04:00
d05652f880
Fixed visibility issues in IE6
...
- Wasn't properly falling back
2011-03-13 21:47:40 -04:00
e1bb48a8d9
Added visibility test to ensure supertypes do not have access to private members of subtypes when invoked
2011-03-13 15:39:14 -04:00
e03c081cfd
Fixed bug that made private members of a supertype inaccessible to methods that have not been overridden by a subtype
...
- In doing so, abandoned the super identifier (sid) for a more elegant solution with class ids (cid's)
- This permits fast and easy private member swapping via getMethodInstance() in class.js
2011-03-13 04:51:00 -04:00
e0fb37daa0
Overridden methods now property return instance when returning 'this'
...
- There may be a cleaner way to do this. This is a quick fix.
2011-03-10 12:40:55 -05:00
84363aca45
Added test to ensure correct instance is returned when returning 'this' from a parent method
2011-03-10 12:24:59 -05:00
7427958ec0
Returning 'this' from a method will now return the object instance, not the internal property object
2011-03-10 12:19:39 -05:00
4e2f174667
Added test for good measure to ensure class instances do not share protected member values
2011-03-07 00:19:56 -05:00
e05a65d5fa
Initial concept of inheriting protected/private members
2011-03-07 00:14:43 -05:00
30bfde50cd
Tada! Private members.
2011-03-06 23:03:39 -05:00
c1765cd720
Using visibility fallback for browsers that do not support getters/setters
2011-03-06 22:43:14 -05:00
bc9e2bb7b2
Fix setting public properties
...
- This currently only works with ES5 engines
- Fallback to follow so this will work with pre-ES5 engines
- As such, I do not recommend using this commit outside of ES5-compliant engines that work properly with getters/setters
- This does NOT include IE8, as IE8 only works with getters/setters on DOM elements
2011-03-02 23:21:10 -05:00
74c2fc57c1
Initial implementation of protected members
...
- This was quite the pain in the ass
- There are additional considerations. I DO NOT recommend using this commit. Check out a later commit.
2011-03-02 20:43:24 -05:00
02d0c07f98
Extended existing visibility tests to include methods
2011-01-27 22:39:52 -05:00
38c16048cb
Began adding protected/private member support
...
- No longer adding ANY properties to prototype
- protected/private members no longer part of the public access level
2011-01-27 22:35:40 -05:00
Mike Gerwitz