Minor documentation correction (>= to >)
parent
4479ea84af
commit
d5ef3eb221
|
@ -1077,7 +1077,7 @@ we did not swap out the object, @var{_name} would be undefined when invoked on
|
||||||
Given this new information, the implementation would more formally be
|
Given this new information, the implementation would more formally be
|
||||||
represented as a collection of objects @var{V} for class @var{C} and each of its
|
represented as a collection of objects @var{V} for class @var{C} and each of its
|
||||||
supertypes as denoted by @var{C\_n}, with @var{C\_0} representing the class
|
supertypes as denoted by @var{C\_n}, with @var{C\_0} representing the class
|
||||||
having been instantiated and any integer @var{n} >= 0 representing the closest
|
having been instantiated and any integer @var{n} > 0 representing the closest
|
||||||
supertype, such that each @var{V\_n} is associated with @var{C\_n},
|
supertype, such that each @var{V\_n} is associated with @var{C\_n},
|
||||||
@var{V\_n\^x} is the visibility object bound to any method associated with class
|
@var{V\_n\^x} is the visibility object bound to any method associated with class
|
||||||
@var{C\_x} and each @var{V} shares the same prototype chain @var{P\_n} for any
|
@var{C\_x} and each @var{V} shares the same prototype chain @var{P\_n} for any
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue