1
0
Fork 0

[#25] Began moving test-class-implement over to new test case system

closure/master
Mike Gerwitz 2011-11-02 22:32:45 -04:00
parent f15fa03a3b
commit 79d0c4a62c
1 changed files with 205 additions and 195 deletions

View File

@ -45,207 +45,217 @@ var Type = Interface.extend( {
; ;
( function testClassExportsContainImplementMethodToExtendFromNoBaseClass() require( 'common' ).testCase(
{ {
assert.ok( 'Class exports contain implement method for no base class': function()
( Class.implement instanceof Function ),
"Class provides method to implement interfaces"
);
} )();
( function testClassObjectsContainImplementMethodToImplementUsingItselfAsABase()
{
assert.ok(
( PlainFoo.implement instanceof Function ),
"Classes contain an implement() method"
);
} )();
( function testCanImplementInterfaceFromAnEmptyBase()
{
assert.doesNotThrow( function()
{ {
Class.implement( Type, Type2 ); this.assertOk(
}, Error, "Class can implement interfaces" ); ( Class.implement instanceof Function ),
} )(); "Class provides method to implement interfaces"
);
},
/** 'Clsss object contains implement method for self as base': function()
* Initially, the implement() method returned an abstract class. However, it
* doesn't make sense to create a class without any actual definition (and
* there's other implementation considerations that caused this route to be
* taken). One wouldn't do "class Foo implements Type", and not provide any
* body.
*
* Therefore, implement() should return nothing useful until extend() is called
* on it.
*/
( function testResultOfImplementIsNotUsableAsAClass()
{
var result = Class.implement( Type );
assert.equal(
( Class.isClass( result ) ),
false,
"Result of implement operation on class is not usable as a Class"
);
} )();
/**
* As a consequence of the above, we must extend with an empty definition
* (base) in order to get our abstract class.
*/
( function testAbstractMethodsCopiedIntoNewClassUsingEmptyBase()
{
Foo = AbstractClass.implement( Type, Type2 ).extend( {} );
assert.ok(
( ( Foo.prototype.foo instanceof Function )
&& ( Foo.prototype.foo2 instanceof Function )
),
"Abstract methods are copied into the new class prototype (empty base)"
);
} )();
( function testCanImplementInterfaceAtopAnExistingClass()
{
assert.doesNotThrow( function()
{ {
PlainFoo.implement( Type, Type2 ); this.assertOk(
}, Error, "Classes can implement interfaces" ); ( PlainFoo.implement instanceof Function ),
} )(); "Classes contain an implement() method"
);
},
/** 'Can implement interface from an empty base': function()
* Ensure the same system mentioned above also applies to the extend() method on
* existing classes
*/
( function testImplementingInterfaceAtopExistingClassIsNotUsableByDefault()
{
var result = PlainFoo.implement( Type );
assert.equal(
( Class.isClass( result ) ),
false,
"Result of implementing interfaces on an existing base is not " +
"usable as a Class"
);
} )();
( function testAbstractMethodsCopiedIntoNewClassUsingExistingBase()
{
PlainFoo2 = AbstractClass.implement( Type, Type2 ).extend( PlainFoo, {} );
assert.ok(
( ( PlainFoo2.prototype.foo instanceof Function )
&& ( PlainFoo2.prototype.foo2 instanceof Function )
),
"Abstract methods are copied into the new class prototype (concrete base)"
);
} )();
/**
* Since interfaces can contain only abstract methods, it stands to reason that
* any class implementing an interface without providing any concrete methods
* should be abstract by default.
*/
( function testClassesImplementingInterfacesAreConsideredAbstractByDefault()
{
assert.equal(
( Foo.isAbstract() && PlainFoo2.isAbstract() ),
true,
"Classes that implements interface(s) are considered abstract if the " +
"implemented methods have no concrete implementations"
);
} ) ();
( function testInstancesOfClassesAreInstancesOfTheirImplementedInterfaces()
{
// concrete implementation so that we can instantiate it
var ConcreteFoo = Foo.extend(
{
'foo': function() {},
'foo2': function() {},
}),
concrete_inst = ConcreteFoo()
;
assert.ok(
( concrete_inst.isInstanceOf( Type )
&& concrete_inst.isInstanceOf( Type2 )
),
"Instances of classes implementing interfaces are considered to be " +
"instances of the implemented interfaces"
);
assert.equal(
ConcreteFoo.isAbstract(),
false,
"Concrete implementations are not considered to be abstract"
);
} )();
/**
* Consider the following scenario:
*
* MyClass.implement( Type ).extend( MyOtherClass, {} );
*
* What the above is essentially saying is: "I'd like to extend MyClass by
* implementing Type. Oh, no, wait, I'd actually like it to extend
* MyOtherClass." That doesn't make sense! Likely, it's unintended. Prevent
* confusion and bugs. Throw an error.
*/
( function testCannotSpecifyParentAfterImplementingAtopExistingClass()
{
assert.throws( function()
{
// should not be permitted
PlainFoo.implement( Type, Type2 ).extend( PlainFoo2, {} );
},
Error,
"Cannot specify new parent for extend() when implementing from " +
"existing class"
);
} )();
/**
* Opposite of the above test. If a parent wasn't specified to begin with, then
* we're fine to specify it in extend().
*/
( function testCanSpecifyParentIfImplementingAtopEmptyClass()
{
assert.doesNotThrow(
function()
{
// this /should/ work
AbstractClass.implement( Type ).extend( PlainFoo, {} );
},
Error,
"Can specify parent for exetnd() when implementing atop an " +
"empty base"
);
} )();
/**
* If more than two arguments are given to extend(), then the developer likely
* does not understand the API. Throw an error to prevent some bugs/confusion.
*/
( function testThrowsExceptionIfExtendContainsTooManyArguments()
{
assert.throws( function()
{ {
Class.implement( Type ).extend( PlainFoo, {}, 'extra' ); this.assertDoesNotThrow( function()
}, Error, "extend() after implementing accepts no more than two args" ); {
} )(); Class.implement( Type, Type2 );
}, Error, "Class can implement interfaces" );
},
/**
* Initially, the implement() method returned an abstract class. However, it
* doesn't make sense to create a class without any actual definition (and
* there's other implementation considerations that caused this route to be
* taken). One wouldn't do "class Foo implements Type", and not provide any
* body.
*
* Therefore, implement() should return nothing useful until extend() is
* called on it.
*/
'Result of implement is not usable as a class': function()
{
var result = Class.implement( Type );
this.assertEqual(
( Class.isClass( result ) ),
false,
"Result of implement operation on class is not usable as a Class"
);
},
/**
* As a consequence of the above, we must extend with an empty definition
* (base) in order to get our abstract class.
*/
'Abstract methods are copied into new class using empty base': function()
{
Foo = AbstractClass.implement( Type, Type2 ).extend( {} );
this.assertOk(
( ( Foo.prototype.foo instanceof Function )
&& ( Foo.prototype.foo2 instanceof Function )
),
"Abstract methods are copied into the new class prototype " +
"(empty base)"
);
},
'Can implement interface atop an exist class': function()
{
this.assertDoesNotThrow( function()
{
PlainFoo.implement( Type, Type2 );
}, Error, "Classes can implement interfaces" );
},
/**
* Ensure the same system mentioned above also applies to the extend()
* method on existing classes
*/
'Implementing interface atop existing class not usable by default':
function()
{
var result = PlainFoo.implement( Type );
this.assertEqual(
( Class.isClass( result ) ),
false,
"Result of implementing interfaces on an existing base is not " +
"usable as a Class"
);
},
'Abstract method copied into new class using existing base': function()
{
PlainFoo2 = AbstractClass.implement( Type, Type2 )
.extend( PlainFoo, {} );
this.assertOk(
( ( PlainFoo2.prototype.foo instanceof Function )
&& ( PlainFoo2.prototype.foo2 instanceof Function )
),
"Abstract methods are copied into the new class prototype " +
"(concrete base)"
);
},
/**
* Since interfaces can contain only abstract methods, it stands to reason
* that any class implementing an interface without providing any concrete
* methods should be abstract by default.
*/
'Classes implementing interfaces are considered abstract by default':
function()
{
this.assertEqual(
( Foo.isAbstract() && PlainFoo2.isAbstract() ),
true,
"Classes that implements interface(s) are considered abstract if " +
"the implemented methods have no concrete implementations"
);
},
'Instances of classes are instances of their implemented interfaces':
function()
{
// concrete implementation so that we can instantiate it
var ConcreteFoo = Foo.extend(
{
'foo': function() {},
'foo2': function() {},
}),
concrete_inst = ConcreteFoo()
;
this.assertOk(
( concrete_inst.isInstanceOf( Type )
&& concrete_inst.isInstanceOf( Type2 )
),
"Instances of classes implementing interfaces are considered to " +
"be instances of the implemented interfaces"
);
this.assertEqual(
ConcreteFoo.isAbstract(),
false,
"Concrete implementations are not considered to be abstract"
);
},
/**
* Consider the following scenario:
*
* MyClass.implement( Type ).extend( MyOtherClass, {} );
*
* What the above is essentially saying is: "I'd like to extend MyClass by
* implementing Type. Oh, no, wait, I'd actually like it to extend
* MyOtherClass." That doesn't make sense! Likely, it's unintended. Prevent
* confusion and bugs. Throw an error.
*/
'Cannot specify parent after implementing atop existing class': function()
{
this.assertThrows( function()
{
// should not be permitted
PlainFoo.implement( Type, Type2 ).extend( PlainFoo2, {} );
},
Error,
"Cannot specify new parent for extend() when implementing from " +
"existing class"
);
},
/**
* Opposite of the above test. If a parent wasn't specified to begin with,
* then we're fine to specify it in extend().
*/
'Can specify parent if implementing atop empty class': function()
{
this.assertDoesNotThrow(
function()
{
// this /should/ work
AbstractClass.implement( Type ).extend( PlainFoo, {} );
},
Error,
"Can specify parent for exetnd() when implementing atop an " +
"empty base"
);
},
/**
* If more than two arguments are given to extend(), then the developer
* likely does not understand the API. Throw an error to prevent some
* bugs/confusion.
*/
'Throws exception if extend contains too many arguments': function()
{
this.assertThrows( function()
{
Class.implement( Type ).extend( PlainFoo, {}, 'extra' );
}, Error, "extend() after implementing accepts no more than two args" );
},
} );