From 90aa74d0cb3bb0bd344a0de25699052e9c2e70fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Gerwitz <mtg@gnu.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:37:24 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ES6-style constructor added to documentation

---
 doc/classes.texi | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/classes.texi b/doc/classes.texi
index 7f5c28b..748b3bb 100644
--- a/doc/classes.texi
+++ b/doc/classes.texi
@@ -323,17 +323,22 @@ class is causing the issue.
 
 @node Constructors
 @subsection Constructors
-In JavaScript, we are used to functions themselves being a constructor
-because only constructors can be instantiated. With ease.js, constructors
-are handled in a manner similar to most other languages, by providing a
-separate method. The implementation ease.js chose is very similar to that of
-PHP's (@pxref{Constructor Implementation}).
+A ``constructor'' in JavaScript is simply a function---whether or not
+it actually constructs a new object depends on whether the @code{tt}
+keyword is used.  With ease.js, constructors are handled in a manner
+similar to most other languages: by providing a separate method.
+
+Until the release of ECMAScript@tie{}6, which introduced the @code{class}
+keyword, there was no convention for constructors defined in this
+manner.  The implementation ease.js chose is very similar to that of
+PHP's (@pxref{Constructor Implementation}):
 
 @float Figure, f:constructor
 @verbatim
     var Foo = Class( 'Foo',
     {
-        'public __construct': function( name )
+        // may also use `construct`; see below
+        __construct: function( name )
         {
             console.log( 'Hello, ' + name + '!' );
         }
@@ -348,6 +353,31 @@ PHP's (@pxref{Constructor Implementation}).
 @caption{Declaring constructors using ease.js}
 @end float
 
+ease.js introduced the @code{constructor} method in version@tie{}0.2.7
+to match the ES6 ``class'' implementation; it is an alias for
+@code{__construct}.  This method name may be used prior to ES6.
+
+@float Figure, f:constructor-es6
+@verbatim
+    // ECMAScript 6 syntax
+    let Foo = Class( 'Foo',
+    {
+        // you may still use __construct
+        constructor( name )
+        {
+            console.log( 'Hello, ' + name + '!' );
+        }
+    } );
+
+    // instantiate the class, invoking the constructor
+    Foo( 'World' );
+
+    // Output:
+    // Hello, World!
+@end verbatim
+@caption{Declaring constructors in an ECMAScript 6 style}
+@end float
+
 When the class is instantiated, the constructor is invoked, permitting you
 do to any necessary initialization tasks before the class can be used. The
 constructor operates exactly how you would expect a constructor to in

From 0e26f9fd0f5c98748d54f5237eedac343df14f1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Gerwitz <mtg@gnu.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:38:04 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Strip `public` keyword from __construct in docs

It must be public, so by convention, I don't include it anymore.  But this
is personal preference.
---
 doc/classes.texi | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/classes.texi b/doc/classes.texi
index 748b3bb..d35fc04 100644
--- a/doc/classes.texi
+++ b/doc/classes.texi
@@ -1178,7 +1178,7 @@ Therefore, we will use a static property of class @var{BigBang}.
          *
          * @return  {undefined}
          */
-        'public __construct': function( type, data )
+        __construct: function( type, data )
         {
             this._type = type;
 
@@ -1343,7 +1343,7 @@ mounts from @file{/etc/fstab}:
         'private _mountPoints': [],
 
 
-        'public __construct': function()
+        __construct: function()
         {
             var data = fs.readFileSync( this.$('_PATH') );
             this._parseMountPoints( data );