1
0
Fork 0

Correct trait->class calling context on class supertype

See test cases for more information.  This was a pretty unfortunate and
nasty bug that I discovered while working on a project that uses easejs; it
wasn't something that was found previously because this support was only
added relatively recently, and this problem does not exist if an interface
is used.

* lib/Trait.js (bindSuperCtx): Add function.
  (tctor): Use it.

* test/Trait/ScopeTest.js: Add calling context tests.
master
Mike Gerwitz 2016-12-29 02:33:01 -05:00
parent 748ceaf0bf
commit 04e98e682e
Signed by: mikegerwitz
GPG Key ID: 8C917B7F5DC51BA2
2 changed files with 253 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -908,6 +908,10 @@ function tctor( tc, base, privsym )
// the intimate relationship // the intimate relationship
this[ f ] = C( base, this[ privsym ].vis )[ privsym ].vis; this[ f ] = C( base, this[ privsym ].vis )[ privsym ].vis;
// rebind trait's supertype context (if any) to our own, causing us
// to share state
bindSuperCtx( this[ f ], this, privsym );
// this has been previously validated to ensure that it is a // this has been previously validated to ensure that it is a
// function // function
this[ f ].__mixin && this[ f ].__mixin.apply( this[ f ].__mixin && this[ f ].__mixin.apply(
@ -920,6 +924,34 @@ function tctor( tc, base, privsym )
}; };
/**
* Bind the supertype context to that of another instance
*
* The source instance FROM is expected to have a `___$$super$$' property
* holding a reference to the supertype. The context associated with the
* supertype's class id X in FROM will then be reassigned by reference to
* the context X of instance TO.
*
* This has the effect of ensuring that, whenever a call enters the
* supertype's context in FROM, it will use all state from the context of
* TO. For mixins, this means that---despite the trait itself inheriting
* from the class---we will use the private state of the _mixer_, not our
* own.
*
* This is all done without any loss in performance, since calling context
* is immediately bound rather than resolved during each method call.
*
* TODO: make into a standard API for class manipulation
*/
function bindSuperCtx( from, to, privsym )
{
var ctx = from[ privsym ].vis,
cid = ctx.___$$super$$.__cid;
ctx[ privsym ].vis[ cid ] = to[ privsym ].vis[ cid ];
}
/** /**
* Create trait constructor * Create trait constructor
* *

View File

@ -17,14 +17,19 @@
* *
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
* along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. * along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*
* These tests could possibly duplicate tests elsewhere; that's fine, as
* this is a vital concept that wouldn't hurt to be reiterated in a
* different context (no pun intended).
*/ */
require( 'common' ).testCase( require( 'common' ).testCase(
{ {
caseSetUp: function() caseSetUp: function()
{ {
this.Sut = this.require( 'Trait' ); this.Sut = this.require( 'Trait' );
this.Class = this.require( 'class' ); this.Class = this.require( 'class' );
this.Interface = this.require( 'interface' );
}, },
@ -149,4 +154,218 @@ require( 'common' ).testCase(
} )().callFoo(); } )().callFoo();
} ); } );
}, },
/**
* When a class makes a call to a trait method, the calling context
* should be that of the trait itself (that is, the trait has its own
* internal state).
*/
'Class->trait calling context binds to trait': function()
{
var T = this.Sut(
{
'private _foo': [],
_givenMixin: null,
// must be properly bound before mixin
__mixin: function()
{
this._givenMixin = this.get();
},
push: function( item )
{
this._foo.push( item );
},
// make sure calling context is preserved on override
'virtual overridePush': function( item )
{
this._foo.push( item );
},
get: function()
{
return this._foo;
},
getGivenMixin: function()
{
return this._givenMixin;
},
} );
var inst = this.Class.use( T ).extend(
{
// ensure calling context on T
superPush: function( item )
{
this.push( item );
},
'override overridePush': function( item )
{
this.__super( item );
},
} )();
inst.push( 'a' );
inst.superPush( 'b' );
inst.overridePush( 'c' );
this.assertDeepEqual( [ 'a', 'b', 'c' ], inst.get() );
this.assertStrictEqual( inst.get(), inst.getGivenMixin() );
},
/**
* This test focuses on an implementation detail: that traits extending
* classes literally extend that class. The problem there is that,
* because of this detail, calling one of the supertypes methods is
* going to apply the method within the context of _that
* trait_. Remember: each object has private state associated with each
* class in its hierarchy. So the class C containing the mixin of trait
* T has it's own state S_c, and T has its own state T_c because of the
* extension. Given C#Foo, calling T#Foo applies T_c rather than the
* intended C_c. That is, without proper care.
*
* This tests to make sure the context has been properly rebound to the
* mixer.
*/
'Trait->class calling context binds to class': function()
{
var C = this.Class(
{
'private _stack': [],
'virtual push': function( item )
{
this._stack.push( item );
},
// non-virtual, test fall-through
getStack: function()
{
return this._stack;
},
} );
var T = this.Sut.extend( C,
{
_givenMixin: null,
// proper context set before __mixin
__mixin: function()
{
this._givenMixin = this.getStack();
},
// proper context to __super
'override push': function( item )
{
this.__super( item );
},
// proper context to parent `getStack'
getSuperStack: function()
{
return this.getStack();
},
getGivenMixin: function()
{
return this._givenMixin;
},
} );
var stack = C.use( T )();
stack.push( 'a' );
// proper context to parent method call (non-__super)
this.assertStrictEqual( stack.getStack(), stack.getSuperStack() );
// proper context to __super
this.assertDeepEqual( [ 'a' ], stack.getStack() );
// context available before __mixin
this.assertStrictEqual( stack.getStack(), stack.getGivenMixin() );
},
/**
* Similar to the above, except that we extend an interface rather than
* a base class.
*
* Notice how T here implements I rather than extending C, and
* consequently uses `abstract override' in place of `override'.
*
* What is interesting in this case is whether this test fails when the
* previous does not, or vice-versa (such was the case when this test
* was introduced).
*/
'Trait->interface calling context binds to implementing class': function()
{
var I = this.Interface(
{
push: [ 'item' ],
getStack: [],
} );
var C = this.Class.implement( I ).extend(
{
'private _stack': [],
'virtual push': function( item )
{
this._stack.push( item );
},
// non-virtual, test fall-through
getStack: function()
{
return this._stack;
},
} );
var T = this.Sut.implement( I ).extend(
{
_givenMixin: null,
// proper context set before __mixin
__mixin: function()
{
this._givenMixin = this.getStack();
},
// proper context to __super
'abstract override push': function( item )
{
this.__super( item );
},
// proper context to parent `getStack'
getSuperStack: function()
{
return this.getStack();
},
getGivenMixin: function()
{
return this._givenMixin;
},
} );
var stack = C.use( T )();
stack.push( 'a' );
// proper context to parent method call (non-__super)
this.assertStrictEqual( stack.getStack(), stack.getSuperStack() );
// proper context to __super
this.assertDeepEqual( [ 'a' ], stack.getStack() );
// context available before __mixin
this.assertStrictEqual( stack.getStack(), stack.getGivenMixin() );
},
} ); } );