2011-05-22 13:57:56 -04:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* Wrapper permitting the definition of abstract classes
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This doesn't actually introduce any new functionality. Rather, it sets a flag
|
|
|
|
* to allow abstract methods within a class, forcing users to clearly state
|
|
|
|
* that a class is abstract.
|
|
|
|
*
|
2013-12-22 08:53:10 -05:00
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2010, 2011, 2013 Mike Gerwitz
|
2011-05-22 13:57:56 -04:00
|
|
|
*
|
2013-12-22 09:37:21 -05:00
|
|
|
* This file is part of GNU ease.js.
|
2011-05-22 13:57:56 -04:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* ease.js is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the
|
Relicensed under the GPLv3+
This project was originally LGPLv+-licensed to encourage its use in a community
that is largely copyleft-phobic. After further reflection, that was a mistake,
as adoption is not the important factor here---software freedom is.
When submitting ease.js to the GNU project, it was asked if I would be willing
to relicense it under the GPLv3+; I agreed happily, because there is no reason
why we should provide proprietary software any sort of edge. Indeed, proprietary
JavaScript is a huge problem since it is automatically downloaded on the user's
PC generally without them even knowing, and is a current focus for the FSF. As
such, to remain firm in our stance against proprietary JavaScript, relicensing
made the most sense for GNU.
This is likely to upset current users of ease.js. I am not sure of their
number---I have only seen download counts periodically on npmjs.org---but I know
there are at least a small number. These users are free to continue using the
previous LGPL'd releases, but with the understanding that there will be no
further maintenance (not even bug fixes). If possible, users should use the
GPL-licensed versions and release their software as free software.
Here comes GNU ease.js.
2013-12-20 01:00:35 -05:00
|
|
|
* terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software
|
|
|
|
* Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later
|
|
|
|
* version.
|
2011-05-22 13:57:56 -04:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
|
|
|
|
* ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
|
Relicensed under the GPLv3+
This project was originally LGPLv+-licensed to encourage its use in a community
that is largely copyleft-phobic. After further reflection, that was a mistake,
as adoption is not the important factor here---software freedom is.
When submitting ease.js to the GNU project, it was asked if I would be willing
to relicense it under the GPLv3+; I agreed happily, because there is no reason
why we should provide proprietary software any sort of edge. Indeed, proprietary
JavaScript is a huge problem since it is automatically downloaded on the user's
PC generally without them even knowing, and is a current focus for the FSF. As
such, to remain firm in our stance against proprietary JavaScript, relicensing
made the most sense for GNU.
This is likely to upset current users of ease.js. I am not sure of their
number---I have only seen download counts periodically on npmjs.org---but I know
there are at least a small number. These users are free to continue using the
previous LGPL'd releases, but with the understanding that there will be no
further maintenance (not even bug fixes). If possible, users should use the
GPL-licensed versions and release their software as free software.
Here comes GNU ease.js.
2013-12-20 01:00:35 -05:00
|
|
|
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for
|
|
|
|
* more details.
|
2011-05-22 13:57:56 -04:00
|
|
|
*
|
Relicensed under the GPLv3+
This project was originally LGPLv+-licensed to encourage its use in a community
that is largely copyleft-phobic. After further reflection, that was a mistake,
as adoption is not the important factor here---software freedom is.
When submitting ease.js to the GNU project, it was asked if I would be willing
to relicense it under the GPLv3+; I agreed happily, because there is no reason
why we should provide proprietary software any sort of edge. Indeed, proprietary
JavaScript is a huge problem since it is automatically downloaded on the user's
PC generally without them even knowing, and is a current focus for the FSF. As
such, to remain firm in our stance against proprietary JavaScript, relicensing
made the most sense for GNU.
This is likely to upset current users of ease.js. I am not sure of their
number---I have only seen download counts periodically on npmjs.org---but I know
there are at least a small number. These users are free to continue using the
previous LGPL'd releases, but with the understanding that there will be no
further maintenance (not even bug fixes). If possible, users should use the
GPL-licensed versions and release their software as free software.
Here comes GNU ease.js.
2013-12-20 01:00:35 -05:00
|
|
|
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with
|
|
|
|
* this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
|
2011-05-22 13:57:56 -04:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* @author Mike Gerwitz
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var Class = require( __dirname + '/class' );
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-05-22 19:15:19 -04:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* Creates an abstract class
|
|
|
|
*
|
2011-12-13 21:19:14 -05:00
|
|
|
* @return {Function} abstract class
|
2011-05-22 19:15:19 -04:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2011-05-22 13:57:56 -04:00
|
|
|
module.exports = exports = function()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
markAbstract( arguments );
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// forward everything to Class
|
2011-05-22 21:05:46 -04:00
|
|
|
var result = Class.apply( this, arguments );
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// if we're using the temporary object, then override its methods to permit
|
|
|
|
// abstract classes
|
|
|
|
if ( !Class.isClass( result ) )
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
abstractOverride( result );
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return result;
|
2011-05-22 13:57:56 -04:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-05-22 19:15:19 -04:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* Creates an abstract class from a class extend operation
|
|
|
|
*
|
2011-12-13 21:19:14 -05:00
|
|
|
* @return {Function} abstract class
|
2011-05-22 19:15:19 -04:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2011-05-22 13:57:56 -04:00
|
|
|
exports.extend = function()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
markAbstract( arguments );
|
|
|
|
return Class.extend.apply( this, arguments );
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-05-22 19:15:19 -04:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* Creates an abstract class implementing the given members
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Simply wraps the class module's implement() method.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* @return {Object} abstract class
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2011-05-22 13:57:56 -04:00
|
|
|
exports.implement = function()
|
|
|
|
{
|
2011-05-22 21:05:46 -04:00
|
|
|
var impl = Class.implement.apply( this, arguments );
|
2011-05-22 13:57:56 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2011-05-22 21:05:46 -04:00
|
|
|
abstractOverride( impl );
|
2011-05-22 13:57:56 -04:00
|
|
|
return impl;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-05-22 19:15:19 -04:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* Causes a definition to be flagged as abstract
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This function assumes the last argument to be the definition, which is the
|
|
|
|
* common case, and modifies the object referenced by that argument.
|
|
|
|
*
|
2011-12-13 21:19:14 -05:00
|
|
|
* @param {Arguments} args arguments to parse
|
2011-05-22 19:15:19 -04:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* @return {undefined}
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2011-05-22 13:57:56 -04:00
|
|
|
function markAbstract( args )
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// the last argument _should_ be the definition
|
|
|
|
var dfn = args[ args.length - 1 ];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if ( typeof dfn === 'object' )
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// mark as abstract
|
|
|
|
dfn.___$$abstract$$ = true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2011-05-22 21:05:46 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* Overrides object members to permit abstract classes
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* @param {Object} obj object to override
|
|
|
|
*
|
2011-12-20 20:06:38 -05:00
|
|
|
* @return {Object} obj
|
2011-05-22 21:05:46 -04:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
function abstractOverride( obj )
|
|
|
|
{
|
2011-12-20 20:06:38 -05:00
|
|
|
var extend = obj.extend,
|
|
|
|
impl = obj.implement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// wrap and apply the abstract flag, only if the method is defined (it may
|
|
|
|
// not be under all circumstances, e.g. after an implement())
|
|
|
|
impl && ( obj.implement = function()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return abstractOverride( impl.apply( this, arguments ) );
|
|
|
|
} );
|
2011-05-22 21:05:46 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// wrap extend, applying the abstract flag
|
|
|
|
obj.extend = function()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
markAbstract( arguments );
|
|
|
|
return extend.apply( this, arguments );
|
|
|
|
};
|
2011-12-20 20:06:38 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return obj;
|
2011-05-22 21:05:46 -04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|