2010-12-16 23:15:42 -05:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* Tests util.clone
|
|
|
|
*
|
2013-12-20 01:11:26 -05:00
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2010, 2011, 2013 Mike Gerwitz
|
2010-12-16 23:15:42 -05:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This file is part of ease.js.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* ease.js is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the
|
Relicensed under the GPLv3+
This project was originally LGPLv+-licensed to encourage its use in a community
that is largely copyleft-phobic. After further reflection, that was a mistake,
as adoption is not the important factor here---software freedom is.
When submitting ease.js to the GNU project, it was asked if I would be willing
to relicense it under the GPLv3+; I agreed happily, because there is no reason
why we should provide proprietary software any sort of edge. Indeed, proprietary
JavaScript is a huge problem since it is automatically downloaded on the user's
PC generally without them even knowing, and is a current focus for the FSF. As
such, to remain firm in our stance against proprietary JavaScript, relicensing
made the most sense for GNU.
This is likely to upset current users of ease.js. I am not sure of their
number---I have only seen download counts periodically on npmjs.org---but I know
there are at least a small number. These users are free to continue using the
previous LGPL'd releases, but with the understanding that there will be no
further maintenance (not even bug fixes). If possible, users should use the
GPL-licensed versions and release their software as free software.
Here comes GNU ease.js.
2013-12-20 01:00:35 -05:00
|
|
|
* terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software
|
|
|
|
* Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later
|
|
|
|
* version.
|
2010-12-16 23:15:42 -05:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
|
|
|
|
* ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
|
Relicensed under the GPLv3+
This project was originally LGPLv+-licensed to encourage its use in a community
that is largely copyleft-phobic. After further reflection, that was a mistake,
as adoption is not the important factor here---software freedom is.
When submitting ease.js to the GNU project, it was asked if I would be willing
to relicense it under the GPLv3+; I agreed happily, because there is no reason
why we should provide proprietary software any sort of edge. Indeed, proprietary
JavaScript is a huge problem since it is automatically downloaded on the user's
PC generally without them even knowing, and is a current focus for the FSF. As
such, to remain firm in our stance against proprietary JavaScript, relicensing
made the most sense for GNU.
This is likely to upset current users of ease.js. I am not sure of their
number---I have only seen download counts periodically on npmjs.org---but I know
there are at least a small number. These users are free to continue using the
previous LGPL'd releases, but with the understanding that there will be no
further maintenance (not even bug fixes). If possible, users should use the
GPL-licensed versions and release their software as free software.
Here comes GNU ease.js.
2013-12-20 01:00:35 -05:00
|
|
|
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for
|
|
|
|
* more details.
|
2010-12-16 23:15:42 -05:00
|
|
|
*
|
Relicensed under the GPLv3+
This project was originally LGPLv+-licensed to encourage its use in a community
that is largely copyleft-phobic. After further reflection, that was a mistake,
as adoption is not the important factor here---software freedom is.
When submitting ease.js to the GNU project, it was asked if I would be willing
to relicense it under the GPLv3+; I agreed happily, because there is no reason
why we should provide proprietary software any sort of edge. Indeed, proprietary
JavaScript is a huge problem since it is automatically downloaded on the user's
PC generally without them even knowing, and is a current focus for the FSF. As
such, to remain firm in our stance against proprietary JavaScript, relicensing
made the most sense for GNU.
This is likely to upset current users of ease.js. I am not sure of their
number---I have only seen download counts periodically on npmjs.org---but I know
there are at least a small number. These users are free to continue using the
previous LGPL'd releases, but with the understanding that there will be no
further maintenance (not even bug fixes). If possible, users should use the
GPL-licensed versions and release their software as free software.
Here comes GNU ease.js.
2013-12-20 01:00:35 -05:00
|
|
|
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with
|
|
|
|
* this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
|
2010-12-16 23:15:42 -05:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* @author Mike Gerwitz
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-21 23:25:12 -05:00
|
|
|
var common = require( './common' ),
|
|
|
|
assert = require( 'assert' ),
|
|
|
|
util = common.require( 'util' );
|
2010-12-16 23:15:42 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var arr = [ 1, 2, 3 ],
|
|
|
|
obj = { a: 1, b: 2 };
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var arr2 = util.clone( arr ),
|
|
|
|
obj2 = util.clone( obj );
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
|
|
( arr !== arr2 ),
|
|
|
|
"Cloned array is not the same object as the original"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
|
|
( obj !== obj2 ),
|
|
|
|
"Cloned object is not the same object as the original"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// ensure array was properly cloned
|
|
|
|
for ( var i = 0, len = arr.length; i < len; i++ )
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
|
|
arr2[ i ],
|
|
|
|
arr[ i ],
|
|
|
|
"Array data is properly cloned"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// ensure object was properly cloned
|
2011-12-10 11:06:34 -05:00
|
|
|
for ( var prop in obj )
|
2010-12-16 23:15:42 -05:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
|
|
obj2[ prop ],
|
|
|
|
obj[ prop ],
|
|
|
|
"Object data is properly cloned"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2011-01-09 01:38:40 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// deep clone
|
2011-01-09 01:46:46 -05:00
|
|
|
var deep_arr = [ [ 1, 2 ], [ 3, 4 ], [ 5, [ 6, 7 ] ], { a: 1 } ],
|
|
|
|
deep_obj = { a: [ 1 ], b: [ 2 ], c: { d: 3 } },
|
|
|
|
|
2011-01-09 01:38:40 -05:00
|
|
|
deep_arr2 = util.clone( deep_arr, true ),
|
2011-01-09 01:46:46 -05:00
|
|
|
deep_obj2 = util.clone( deep_obj, true ),
|
2011-01-09 01:38:40 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
deep_i = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// ensure that the cloned values still match
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
|
|
deep_arr2,
|
|
|
|
deep_arr,
|
|
|
|
"Deep cloned values are equal"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
2011-01-09 01:46:46 -05:00
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
|
|
deep_obj2,
|
|
|
|
deep_obj,
|
|
|
|
"Deep cloned values are equal"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
2011-01-09 01:38:40 -05:00
|
|
|
deep_i = deep_arr.length;
|
|
|
|
while ( deep_i-- )
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
|
|
( deep_arr2[ i ] !== deep_arr[ i ] ),
|
|
|
|
"Deep cloned array's values are cloned"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2011-12-10 11:06:34 -05:00
|
|
|
for ( var prop in deep_obj )
|
2011-01-09 01:46:46 -05:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
|
|
( deep_obj2[ prop ] !== deep_obj[ prop ] ),
|
|
|
|
"Deep cloned object's values are cloned (" + prop + ")"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2011-04-05 23:47:08 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* "Cloning" functions doesn't necessarily make sense. It can, depending on how
|
|
|
|
* you think about it. We can do a toSource() in many circumstances and create a
|
|
|
|
* new function from that. But what's the point? It still does the same thing.
|
|
|
|
* As such, functions will not be cloned. They'll be returned by reference.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
( function testCloneDoesNothingWithFunctions()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
var func = function() {},
|
|
|
|
obj = { foo: func };
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.ok( func === util.clone( obj, true ).foo,
|
|
|
|
"Functions should not be cloned"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
} )();
|
|
|
|
|
2011-12-22 09:37:34 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* Primitives cannot be cloned, so we should expect that they are simply
|
|
|
|
* returned
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
( function testPrimitivesAreProperlyReturnedByClone()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// we don't try NaN because NaN != NaN; we'll try it separately
|
|
|
|
var prim = [ null, 1, true, false, undefined ],
|
|
|
|
i = prim.length;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while ( i-- )
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
var val = prim[ i ];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.equal( val, util.clone( val ),
|
|
|
|
'Failed to clone primitive value: ' + val
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// test NaN separately
|
|
|
|
assert.ok( isNaN( util.clone( NaN ) ) );
|
|
|
|
} )();
|
|
|
|
|