2011-08-28 17:36:27 -04:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* Tests MethodWrapperFactory prototype
|
|
|
|
*
|
2013-12-20 01:11:26 -05:00
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2011, 2012, 2013 Mike Gerwitz
|
2011-08-28 17:36:27 -04:00
|
|
|
*
|
2013-12-22 09:37:21 -05:00
|
|
|
* This file is part of GNU ease.js.
|
2011-08-28 17:36:27 -04:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* ease.js is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the
|
Relicensed under the GPLv3+
This project was originally LGPLv+-licensed to encourage its use in a community
that is largely copyleft-phobic. After further reflection, that was a mistake,
as adoption is not the important factor here---software freedom is.
When submitting ease.js to the GNU project, it was asked if I would be willing
to relicense it under the GPLv3+; I agreed happily, because there is no reason
why we should provide proprietary software any sort of edge. Indeed, proprietary
JavaScript is a huge problem since it is automatically downloaded on the user's
PC generally without them even knowing, and is a current focus for the FSF. As
such, to remain firm in our stance against proprietary JavaScript, relicensing
made the most sense for GNU.
This is likely to upset current users of ease.js. I am not sure of their
number---I have only seen download counts periodically on npmjs.org---but I know
there are at least a small number. These users are free to continue using the
previous LGPL'd releases, but with the understanding that there will be no
further maintenance (not even bug fixes). If possible, users should use the
GPL-licensed versions and release their software as free software.
Here comes GNU ease.js.
2013-12-20 01:00:35 -05:00
|
|
|
* terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software
|
|
|
|
* Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later
|
|
|
|
* version.
|
2011-08-28 17:36:27 -04:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
|
|
|
|
* ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
|
Relicensed under the GPLv3+
This project was originally LGPLv+-licensed to encourage its use in a community
that is largely copyleft-phobic. After further reflection, that was a mistake,
as adoption is not the important factor here---software freedom is.
When submitting ease.js to the GNU project, it was asked if I would be willing
to relicense it under the GPLv3+; I agreed happily, because there is no reason
why we should provide proprietary software any sort of edge. Indeed, proprietary
JavaScript is a huge problem since it is automatically downloaded on the user's
PC generally without them even knowing, and is a current focus for the FSF. As
such, to remain firm in our stance against proprietary JavaScript, relicensing
made the most sense for GNU.
This is likely to upset current users of ease.js. I am not sure of their
number---I have only seen download counts periodically on npmjs.org---but I know
there are at least a small number. These users are free to continue using the
previous LGPL'd releases, but with the understanding that there will be no
further maintenance (not even bug fixes). If possible, users should use the
GPL-licensed versions and release their software as free software.
Here comes GNU ease.js.
2013-12-20 01:00:35 -05:00
|
|
|
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for
|
|
|
|
* more details.
|
2011-08-28 17:36:27 -04:00
|
|
|
*
|
Relicensed under the GPLv3+
This project was originally LGPLv+-licensed to encourage its use in a community
that is largely copyleft-phobic. After further reflection, that was a mistake,
as adoption is not the important factor here---software freedom is.
When submitting ease.js to the GNU project, it was asked if I would be willing
to relicense it under the GPLv3+; I agreed happily, because there is no reason
why we should provide proprietary software any sort of edge. Indeed, proprietary
JavaScript is a huge problem since it is automatically downloaded on the user's
PC generally without them even knowing, and is a current focus for the FSF. As
such, to remain firm in our stance against proprietary JavaScript, relicensing
made the most sense for GNU.
This is likely to upset current users of ease.js. I am not sure of their
number---I have only seen download counts periodically on npmjs.org---but I know
there are at least a small number. These users are free to continue using the
previous LGPL'd releases, but with the understanding that there will be no
further maintenance (not even bug fixes). If possible, users should use the
GPL-licensed versions and release their software as free software.
Here comes GNU ease.js.
2013-12-20 01:00:35 -05:00
|
|
|
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with
|
|
|
|
* this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
|
2011-08-28 17:36:27 -04:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* @author Mike Gerwitz
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-05-03 17:21:37 -04:00
|
|
|
require( 'common' ).testCase(
|
2011-08-28 17:36:27 -04:00
|
|
|
{
|
2012-05-03 17:21:37 -04:00
|
|
|
caseSetUp: function()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
this.Sut = this.require( 'MethodWrapperFactory' );
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* To keep with the spirit of ease.js, we should be able to instantiate
|
|
|
|
* MethodWrapperFactory both with and without the 'new' keyword
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Consistency is key with these sorts of things.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
'Can instantiate with and without new keyword': function()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// with 'new' keyword
|
|
|
|
this.assertOk(
|
|
|
|
( new this.Sut() ) instanceof this.Sut,
|
|
|
|
"Should be able to instantiate MethodWrapperFactory with " +
|
|
|
|
"'new' keyword"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// without 'new' keyword
|
|
|
|
this.assertOk( ( this.Sut() instanceof this.Sut ),
|
|
|
|
"Should be able to instantiate MethodWrapperFactory " +
|
|
|
|
"without 'new' keyword"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* The factory itself is rather simple. The class should accept a factory
|
|
|
|
* function which should return the wrapped method.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
'Provided factory function is properly called': function()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
var _self = this,
|
|
|
|
called = false,
|
|
|
|
method = function() {},
|
|
|
|
super_method = function() {},
|
|
|
|
cid = 55,
|
|
|
|
getInst = function() {},
|
|
|
|
name = 'someMethod',
|
|
|
|
keywords = { 'static': true, 'public': true },
|
|
|
|
retval = 'foobar';
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var result = this.Sut(
|
|
|
|
function(
|
|
|
|
given_method, given_super, given_cid, givenGetInst, given_name,
|
|
|
|
given_keywords
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
called = true;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_self.assertEqual( given_method, method,
|
|
|
|
"Factory method should be provided with method to wrap"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_self.assertEqual( given_super, super_method,
|
|
|
|
"Factory method should be provided with super method"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_self.assertEqual( given_cid, cid,
|
|
|
|
"Factory method should be provided with cid"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_self.assertEqual( givenGetInst, getInst,
|
|
|
|
"Factory method should be provided with proper inst function"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_self.assertEqual( given_name, name,
|
|
|
|
"Factory method should be provided with proper method name"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_self.assertEqual( given_keywords, keywords,
|
|
|
|
"Factory method should be provided with proper keywords"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return retval;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
).wrapMethod( method, super_method, cid, getInst, name, keywords );
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// we'll include this in addition to the following assertion (which is
|
|
|
|
// redundant) to make debugging more clear
|
|
|
|
this.assertEqual( called, true,
|
|
|
|
"Given factory method should be called"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this.assertEqual( result, retval,
|
|
|
|
"Should return value from factory function"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
} );
|