GNU
/
easejs
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity
easejs/package.json

42 lines
767 B
JSON
Raw Normal View History

Basic package.json
2011-03-07 23:08:01 -05:00
{
Began updating package.json - Added additional information, including dev deps, license, test script and 'engines'
2011-05-24 22:30:49 -04:00
"name": "easejs",
Updated package.json to remove deps and correct license Growing much closer to releasing. Hopefully in the next couple of days; I just don't want to rush it. Though, at the same time, I've been noticing projects popping up with very similar / exact names to this one. A project named "ease" was added to the npm repository and another "ease.js" is on GitHub, although it's made no progress. As such, I want to ensure I reserve the name in npm. I've been testing the new library and work and noticed only a couple minor issues, primiarly due to misuse of the library. Looking good.
2011-12-13 21:22:52 -05:00
"description": "A Classical Object-Oriented Framework for JavaScript",
0.1.0-pre in package.json until 0.1.0 tag to avoid npm confusion
2011-06-10 14:21:22 -04:00
"version": "0.1.0-pre",
Began updating package.json - Added additional information, including dev deps, license, test script and 'engines'
2011-05-24 22:30:49 -04:00
"author": "Mike Gerwitz <mike@mikegerwitz.com> (http://mikegerwitz.com)",
"homepage": "http://easejs.org",
Basic package.json
2011-03-07 23:08:01 -05:00
Began updating package.json - Added additional information, including dev deps, license, test script and 'engines'
2011-05-24 22:30:49 -04:00
"repository": {
"type": "git",
"url": "git://github.com/mikegerwitz/easejs.git"
},
Basic package.json
2011-03-07 23:08:01 -05:00
Began updating package.json - Added additional information, including dev deps, license, test script and 'engines'
2011-05-24 22:30:49 -04:00
"engines": {
"node": ">0.0.0"
},
"dependencies": {},
Updated package.json to remove deps and correct license Growing much closer to releasing. Hopefully in the next couple of days; I just don't want to rush it. Though, at the same time, I've been noticing projects popping up with very similar / exact names to this one. A project named "ease" was added to the npm repository and another "ease.js" is on GitHub, although it's made no progress. As such, I want to ensure I reserve the name in npm. I've been testing the new library and work and noticed only a couple minor issues, primiarly due to misuse of the library. Looking good.
2011-12-13 21:22:52 -05:00
"devDependencies": {},
Began updating package.json - Added additional information, including dev deps, license, test script and 'engines'
2011-05-24 22:30:49 -04:00
"licenses": [
{
Updated package.json to remove deps and correct license Growing much closer to releasing. Hopefully in the next couple of days; I just don't want to rush it. Though, at the same time, I've been noticing projects popping up with very similar / exact names to this one. A project named "ease" was added to the npm repository and another "ease.js" is on GitHub, although it's made no progress. As such, I want to ensure I reserve the name in npm. I've been testing the new library and work and noticed only a couple minor issues, primiarly due to misuse of the library. Looking good.
2011-12-13 21:22:52 -05:00
"type": "LGPLv3+",
"url": "http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html"
Began updating package.json - Added additional information, including dev deps, license, test script and 'engines'
2011-05-24 22:30:49 -04:00
}
],
"scripts": {
"test": "make test"
},
"tags": [
"object oriented",
"oo",
"oop",
"classes",
"classical",
"interfaces",
"protected members",
"inheritance"
]
Basic package.json
2011-03-07 23:08:01 -05:00
}