1
0
Fork 0
easejs/test/Trait/DefinitionTest.js

157 lines
4.7 KiB
JavaScript
Raw Normal View History

/**
* Tests basic trait definition
*
* Copyright (C) 2014 Mike Gerwitz
*
* This file is part of GNU ease.js.
*
* ease.js is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
* the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
* (at your option) any later version.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
* along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*/
require( 'common' ).testCase(
{
caseSetUp: function()
{
this.Sut = this.require( 'Trait' );
this.Class = this.require( 'class' );
// means of creating anonymous traits
this.ctor = [
this.Sut.extend,
this.Sut,
];
},
/**
* We continue with the same concept used for class
* definitions---extending the Trait module itself will create an
* anonymous trait.
*/
'@each(ctor) Can extend Trait to create anonymous trait': function( T )
{
this.assertOk( this.Sut.isTrait( T( {} ) ) );
},
/**
* A trait can only be used by something else---it does not make sense
* to instantiate them directly, since they form an incomplete picture.
*/
'@each(ctor) Cannot instantiate trait without error': function( T )
{
this.assertThrows( function()
{
T( {} )();
}, Error );
},
/**
* One way that traits acquire meaning is by their use in creating
* classes. This also allows us to observe whether traits are actually
* working as intended without testing too closely to their
* implementation. This test simply ensures that the Class module will
* accept our traits.
*
* Classes consume traits as part of their definition using the `use'
* method. We should be able to then invoke the `extend' method to
* provide our own definition, without having to inherit from another
* class.
*/
'@each(ctor) Base class definition is applied when using traits':
function( T )
{
var expected = 'bar';
var C = this.Class.use( T( {} ) ).extend(
{
foo: expected,
} );
this.assertOk( this.Class.isClass( C ) );
this.assertEqual( C().foo, expected );
},
/**
* Traits contribute to the definition of the class that `use's them;
* therefore, it would stand to reason that we should still be able to
* inherit from a supertype while using traits.
*/
'@each(ctor) Supertype definition is applied when using traits':
function( T )
{
var expected = 'bar';
expected2 = 'baz';
Foo = this.Class( { foo: expected } ),
SubFoo = this.Class.use( T( {} ) )
.extend( Foo, { bar: expected2 } );
var inst = SubFoo();
this.assertOk( this.Class.isA( Foo, inst ) );
this.assertEqual( inst.foo, expected, "Supertype failure" );
this.assertEqual( inst.bar, expected2, "Subtype failure" );
},
/**
* The above tests have ensured that classes are still operable with
* traits; we can now test that traits are mixed into the class
* definition via `use' by asserting on the trait definitions.
*/
'@each(ctor) Trait definition is mixed into base class definition':
function( T )
{
var called = false;
var Trait = T( { foo: function() { called = true; } } ),
inst = this.Class.use( Trait ).extend( {} )();
// if mixin was successful, then we should have the `foo' method.
this.assertDoesNotThrow( function()
{
inst.foo();
}, Error, "Should have access to mixed in fields" );
// if our variable was not set, then it was a bs copy
this.assertOk( called, "Mixed in field copy error" );
},
/**
* The above test should apply just the same to subtypes.
*/
'@each(ctor) Trait definition is mixed into subtype definition':
function( T )
{
var called = false;
var Trait = T( { foo: function() { called = true; } } ),
Foo = this.Class( {} ),
inst = this.Class.use( Trait ).extend( Foo, {} )();
inst.foo();
this.assertOk( called );
},
//
// At this point, we assume that each ctor method is working as expected
// (that is---the same); we will proceed to test only a single method of
// construction under that assumption.
//
} );