2010-11-10 17:41:12 -05:00
|
|
|
/**
|
2010-11-10 20:45:33 -05:00
|
|
|
* Tests class module object creation
|
2010-11-10 17:41:12 -05:00
|
|
|
*
|
2013-12-20 01:11:26 -05:00
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2010, 2011, 2013 Mike Gerwitz
|
2010-11-10 17:41:12 -05:00
|
|
|
*
|
2013-12-22 09:37:21 -05:00
|
|
|
* This file is part of GNU ease.js.
|
2010-11-10 17:41:12 -05:00
|
|
|
*
|
2010-11-10 22:07:03 -05:00
|
|
|
* ease.js is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the
|
Relicensed under the GPLv3+
This project was originally LGPLv+-licensed to encourage its use in a community
that is largely copyleft-phobic. After further reflection, that was a mistake,
as adoption is not the important factor here---software freedom is.
When submitting ease.js to the GNU project, it was asked if I would be willing
to relicense it under the GPLv3+; I agreed happily, because there is no reason
why we should provide proprietary software any sort of edge. Indeed, proprietary
JavaScript is a huge problem since it is automatically downloaded on the user's
PC generally without them even knowing, and is a current focus for the FSF. As
such, to remain firm in our stance against proprietary JavaScript, relicensing
made the most sense for GNU.
This is likely to upset current users of ease.js. I am not sure of their
number---I have only seen download counts periodically on npmjs.org---but I know
there are at least a small number. These users are free to continue using the
previous LGPL'd releases, but with the understanding that there will be no
further maintenance (not even bug fixes). If possible, users should use the
GPL-licensed versions and release their software as free software.
Here comes GNU ease.js.
2013-12-20 01:00:35 -05:00
|
|
|
* terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software
|
|
|
|
* Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later
|
|
|
|
* version.
|
2010-11-10 17:41:12 -05:00
|
|
|
*
|
2010-11-10 22:07:03 -05:00
|
|
|
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
|
|
|
|
* ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
|
Relicensed under the GPLv3+
This project was originally LGPLv+-licensed to encourage its use in a community
that is largely copyleft-phobic. After further reflection, that was a mistake,
as adoption is not the important factor here---software freedom is.
When submitting ease.js to the GNU project, it was asked if I would be willing
to relicense it under the GPLv3+; I agreed happily, because there is no reason
why we should provide proprietary software any sort of edge. Indeed, proprietary
JavaScript is a huge problem since it is automatically downloaded on the user's
PC generally without them even knowing, and is a current focus for the FSF. As
such, to remain firm in our stance against proprietary JavaScript, relicensing
made the most sense for GNU.
This is likely to upset current users of ease.js. I am not sure of their
number---I have only seen download counts periodically on npmjs.org---but I know
there are at least a small number. These users are free to continue using the
previous LGPL'd releases, but with the understanding that there will be no
further maintenance (not even bug fixes). If possible, users should use the
GPL-licensed versions and release their software as free software.
Here comes GNU ease.js.
2013-12-20 01:00:35 -05:00
|
|
|
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for
|
|
|
|
* more details.
|
2010-11-10 22:07:03 -05:00
|
|
|
*
|
Relicensed under the GPLv3+
This project was originally LGPLv+-licensed to encourage its use in a community
that is largely copyleft-phobic. After further reflection, that was a mistake,
as adoption is not the important factor here---software freedom is.
When submitting ease.js to the GNU project, it was asked if I would be willing
to relicense it under the GPLv3+; I agreed happily, because there is no reason
why we should provide proprietary software any sort of edge. Indeed, proprietary
JavaScript is a huge problem since it is automatically downloaded on the user's
PC generally without them even knowing, and is a current focus for the FSF. As
such, to remain firm in our stance against proprietary JavaScript, relicensing
made the most sense for GNU.
This is likely to upset current users of ease.js. I am not sure of their
number---I have only seen download counts periodically on npmjs.org---but I know
there are at least a small number. These users are free to continue using the
previous LGPL'd releases, but with the understanding that there will be no
further maintenance (not even bug fixes). If possible, users should use the
GPL-licensed versions and release their software as free software.
Here comes GNU ease.js.
2013-12-20 01:00:35 -05:00
|
|
|
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with
|
|
|
|
* this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
|
2010-11-10 17:41:12 -05:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* @author Mike Gerwitz
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-21 23:25:12 -05:00
|
|
|
var common = require( './common' ),
|
|
|
|
assert = require( 'assert' ),
|
|
|
|
Class = common.require( 'class' );
|
2010-11-10 17:41:12 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
|
|
( Class.extend instanceof Function ),
|
|
|
|
"Class module should provide an 'extend' method"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
2010-11-10 18:40:36 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2010-11-15 23:22:24 -05:00
|
|
|
var Foo = Class.extend(
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
value: 'foo',
|
|
|
|
});
|
2010-11-10 19:19:02 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2010-11-10 18:40:36 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
|
|
( Foo instanceof Object ),
|
|
|
|
"Extend method creates a new object"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-28 20:58:42 -05:00
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
|
|
( Class.isClass( Class.extend() ) ),
|
|
|
|
"Classes are considered by the system to be classes"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-29 21:18:03 -05:00
|
|
|
var inst = new Foo();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-28 20:58:42 -05:00
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// isClass
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
|
|
( !( Class.isClass( {} ) ) ),
|
|
|
|
"Only actual classes are considered to be classes"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
2010-12-29 21:18:03 -05:00
|
|
|
!( Class.isClass( inst ) ),
|
2010-12-28 20:58:42 -05:00
|
|
|
"Class instances are not considered to be classes (they are objects)"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// isClassInstance
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
2010-12-29 21:18:03 -05:00
|
|
|
( Class.isClassInstance( inst ) ),
|
2010-12-28 20:58:42 -05:00
|
|
|
"Class instances are considered to be classes instances"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
|
|
( !( Class.isClassInstance( Foo ) ) ),
|
|
|
|
"Classes are not considered to be class instances"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
|
|
( !( Class.isClassInstance( {} ) ) ),
|
|
|
|
"Other objects are not considered to be class instances"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-28 09:14:54 -05:00
|
|
|
// only perform check if supported by the engine
|
|
|
|
if ( Object.isFrozen )
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
|
|
Object.isFrozen( Foo ),
|
|
|
|
true,
|
|
|
|
"Generated class should be frozen"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-29 21:13:21 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// isInstanceOf
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
2010-12-29 21:18:03 -05:00
|
|
|
Class.isInstanceOf( Foo, inst ),
|
2010-12-29 21:13:21 -05:00
|
|
|
"Class instance is recognized by Class.isInstanceOf()"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
2011-11-15 22:22:24 -05:00
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
|
|
Class.isInstanceOf( Foo, undefined ) === false,
|
|
|
|
"Checking instance of undefined will not throw an error"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
|
|
Class.isInstanceOf( undefined, {} ) === false,
|
|
|
|
"Checking for instance of undefined will not throw an error"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-29 21:13:21 -05:00
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
|
|
!( Class.isInstanceOf( Foo, Foo ) ),
|
|
|
|
"Class is not an instance of itself when uninstantiated"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
2010-12-29 21:18:03 -05:00
|
|
|
!( Class.isInstanceOf( inst, Foo ) ),
|
2010-12-29 21:13:21 -05:00
|
|
|
"Class is not an instance of its instance"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-29 21:37:11 -05:00
|
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
|
|
Class.isInstanceOf,
|
|
|
|
Class.isA,
|
|
|
|
"isA() is an alias for isInstanceOf()"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-29 21:32:16 -05:00
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
|
|
( ( inst.isInstanceOf instanceof Function )
|
|
|
|
&& ( inst.isInstanceOf( Foo ) === true )
|
|
|
|
&& ( inst.isInstanceOf( inst ) === false )
|
|
|
|
),
|
|
|
|
"Class instance contains partially applied isInstanceOf method"
|
|
|
|
);
|
2010-12-29 21:18:03 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-29 21:37:11 -05:00
|
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
|
|
inst.isInstanceOf,
|
|
|
|
inst.isA,
|
|
|
|
"Class instance contains isA() alias for isInstanceOf() partially applied function"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
2011-01-04 00:37:54 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
|
|
( Foo.__cid !== undefined ),
|
|
|
|
"Class id available via class"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
|
|
( Foo.prototype.__cid !== undefined ),
|
|
|
|
"Class id available via class prototype"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|