2011-03-11 19:20:05 -05:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* Tests amount of time taken to invoke Class methods
|
|
|
|
*
|
2011-03-11 19:27:07 -05:00
|
|
|
* The expected results are as follows:
|
|
|
|
* - Method invocations are expected to be slower than invoking a method on a
|
|
|
|
* conventional constructor instance. This is because of the method wrapper
|
|
|
|
* used by ease.js.
|
|
|
|
* - Public methods externally should be invoked very quickly. They are part
|
|
|
|
* of the class's prototype and therefore easily accessible.
|
|
|
|
* - Public methods /internally/ are likely to be invoked slightly more
|
|
|
|
* slowly. This is because it takes one extra step down the prototype chain
|
|
|
|
* to access them. The difference should be minute.
|
|
|
|
* - Protected and private methods internally should be accessed fairly
|
|
|
|
* quickly since, like public methods externally, they are first on the
|
|
|
|
* prototype chain.
|
2011-03-12 23:48:38 -05:00
|
|
|
* - Protected members will be accessed more slowly than private members,
|
|
|
|
* because they are one step lower on the prototype chain. Future versions
|
|
|
|
* will remove this performance hit if the Class contains no private
|
|
|
|
* members.
|
2011-03-11 19:20:05 -05:00
|
|
|
*
|
2013-12-20 01:11:26 -05:00
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2011, 2013 Mike Gerwitz
|
2011-03-11 19:20:05 -05:00
|
|
|
*
|
2013-12-22 09:37:21 -05:00
|
|
|
* This file is part of GNU ease.js.
|
2011-03-11 19:20:05 -05:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* ease.js is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the
|
Relicensed under the GPLv3+
This project was originally LGPLv+-licensed to encourage its use in a community
that is largely copyleft-phobic. After further reflection, that was a mistake,
as adoption is not the important factor here---software freedom is.
When submitting ease.js to the GNU project, it was asked if I would be willing
to relicense it under the GPLv3+; I agreed happily, because there is no reason
why we should provide proprietary software any sort of edge. Indeed, proprietary
JavaScript is a huge problem since it is automatically downloaded on the user's
PC generally without them even knowing, and is a current focus for the FSF. As
such, to remain firm in our stance against proprietary JavaScript, relicensing
made the most sense for GNU.
This is likely to upset current users of ease.js. I am not sure of their
number---I have only seen download counts periodically on npmjs.org---but I know
there are at least a small number. These users are free to continue using the
previous LGPL'd releases, but with the understanding that there will be no
further maintenance (not even bug fixes). If possible, users should use the
GPL-licensed versions and release their software as free software.
Here comes GNU ease.js.
2013-12-20 01:00:35 -05:00
|
|
|
* terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software
|
|
|
|
* Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later
|
|
|
|
* version.
|
2011-03-11 19:20:05 -05:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
|
|
|
|
* ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
|
Relicensed under the GPLv3+
This project was originally LGPLv+-licensed to encourage its use in a community
that is largely copyleft-phobic. After further reflection, that was a mistake,
as adoption is not the important factor here---software freedom is.
When submitting ease.js to the GNU project, it was asked if I would be willing
to relicense it under the GPLv3+; I agreed happily, because there is no reason
why we should provide proprietary software any sort of edge. Indeed, proprietary
JavaScript is a huge problem since it is automatically downloaded on the user's
PC generally without them even knowing, and is a current focus for the FSF. As
such, to remain firm in our stance against proprietary JavaScript, relicensing
made the most sense for GNU.
This is likely to upset current users of ease.js. I am not sure of their
number---I have only seen download counts periodically on npmjs.org---but I know
there are at least a small number. These users are free to continue using the
previous LGPL'd releases, but with the understanding that there will be no
further maintenance (not even bug fixes). If possible, users should use the
GPL-licensed versions and release their software as free software.
Here comes GNU ease.js.
2013-12-20 01:00:35 -05:00
|
|
|
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for
|
|
|
|
* more details.
|
2011-03-11 19:20:05 -05:00
|
|
|
*
|
Relicensed under the GPLv3+
This project was originally LGPLv+-licensed to encourage its use in a community
that is largely copyleft-phobic. After further reflection, that was a mistake,
as adoption is not the important factor here---software freedom is.
When submitting ease.js to the GNU project, it was asked if I would be willing
to relicense it under the GPLv3+; I agreed happily, because there is no reason
why we should provide proprietary software any sort of edge. Indeed, proprietary
JavaScript is a huge problem since it is automatically downloaded on the user's
PC generally without them even knowing, and is a current focus for the FSF. As
such, to remain firm in our stance against proprietary JavaScript, relicensing
made the most sense for GNU.
This is likely to upset current users of ease.js. I am not sure of their
number---I have only seen download counts periodically on npmjs.org---but I know
there are at least a small number. These users are free to continue using the
previous LGPL'd releases, but with the understanding that there will be no
further maintenance (not even bug fixes). If possible, users should use the
GPL-licensed versions and release their software as free software.
Here comes GNU ease.js.
2013-12-20 01:00:35 -05:00
|
|
|
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with
|
|
|
|
* this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
|
2011-03-11 19:20:05 -05:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* @author Mike Gerwitz
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var common = require( __dirname + '/common.js' ),
|
|
|
|
Class = common.require( 'class' ),
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
count = 500000,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// used to ensure v8 doesn't optimize functions away
|
|
|
|
i = 0,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// instance of anonymous class
|
|
|
|
foo = Class( {
|
|
|
|
'public pub': function() { i++; },
|
|
|
|
'protected prot': function() { i++; },
|
|
|
|
'private priv': function() { i++; },
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'public testInternal': function()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
var _self = this;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
common.test( function()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
var i = count;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while ( i-- )
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
_self.pub();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}, count, 'Invoke public methods internally' );
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
common.test( function()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
var i = count;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while ( i-- )
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
_self.prot();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}, count, 'Invoke protected methods internally' );
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
common.test( function()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
var i = count;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while ( i-- )
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
_self.priv();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}, count, 'Invoke private methods internally' );
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
} )()
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
common.test( function()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
var i = count;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while ( i-- )
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
foo.pub();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}, count, 'Invoke public methods externally' );
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// run the same test internally
|
|
|
|
foo.testInternal();
|
|
|
|
|