2010-12-27 23:04:55 -05:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* Tests property keyword parser
|
|
|
|
*
|
2013-12-20 01:11:26 -05:00
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2010, 2011, 2013 Mike Gerwitz
|
2010-12-27 23:04:55 -05:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This file is part of ease.js.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* ease.js is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the
|
Relicensed under the GPLv3+
This project was originally LGPLv+-licensed to encourage its use in a community
that is largely copyleft-phobic. After further reflection, that was a mistake,
as adoption is not the important factor here---software freedom is.
When submitting ease.js to the GNU project, it was asked if I would be willing
to relicense it under the GPLv3+; I agreed happily, because there is no reason
why we should provide proprietary software any sort of edge. Indeed, proprietary
JavaScript is a huge problem since it is automatically downloaded on the user's
PC generally without them even knowing, and is a current focus for the FSF. As
such, to remain firm in our stance against proprietary JavaScript, relicensing
made the most sense for GNU.
This is likely to upset current users of ease.js. I am not sure of their
number---I have only seen download counts periodically on npmjs.org---but I know
there are at least a small number. These users are free to continue using the
previous LGPL'd releases, but with the understanding that there will be no
further maintenance (not even bug fixes). If possible, users should use the
GPL-licensed versions and release their software as free software.
Here comes GNU ease.js.
2013-12-20 01:00:35 -05:00
|
|
|
* terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software
|
|
|
|
* Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later
|
|
|
|
* version.
|
2010-12-27 23:04:55 -05:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
|
|
|
|
* ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
|
Relicensed under the GPLv3+
This project was originally LGPLv+-licensed to encourage its use in a community
that is largely copyleft-phobic. After further reflection, that was a mistake,
as adoption is not the important factor here---software freedom is.
When submitting ease.js to the GNU project, it was asked if I would be willing
to relicense it under the GPLv3+; I agreed happily, because there is no reason
why we should provide proprietary software any sort of edge. Indeed, proprietary
JavaScript is a huge problem since it is automatically downloaded on the user's
PC generally without them even knowing, and is a current focus for the FSF. As
such, to remain firm in our stance against proprietary JavaScript, relicensing
made the most sense for GNU.
This is likely to upset current users of ease.js. I am not sure of their
number---I have only seen download counts periodically on npmjs.org---but I know
there are at least a small number. These users are free to continue using the
previous LGPL'd releases, but with the understanding that there will be no
further maintenance (not even bug fixes). If possible, users should use the
GPL-licensed versions and release their software as free software.
Here comes GNU ease.js.
2013-12-20 01:00:35 -05:00
|
|
|
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for
|
|
|
|
* more details.
|
2010-12-27 23:04:55 -05:00
|
|
|
*
|
Relicensed under the GPLv3+
This project was originally LGPLv+-licensed to encourage its use in a community
that is largely copyleft-phobic. After further reflection, that was a mistake,
as adoption is not the important factor here---software freedom is.
When submitting ease.js to the GNU project, it was asked if I would be willing
to relicense it under the GPLv3+; I agreed happily, because there is no reason
why we should provide proprietary software any sort of edge. Indeed, proprietary
JavaScript is a huge problem since it is automatically downloaded on the user's
PC generally without them even knowing, and is a current focus for the FSF. As
such, to remain firm in our stance against proprietary JavaScript, relicensing
made the most sense for GNU.
This is likely to upset current users of ease.js. I am not sure of their
number---I have only seen download counts periodically on npmjs.org---but I know
there are at least a small number. These users are free to continue using the
previous LGPL'd releases, but with the understanding that there will be no
further maintenance (not even bug fixes). If possible, users should use the
GPL-licensed versions and release their software as free software.
Here comes GNU ease.js.
2013-12-20 01:00:35 -05:00
|
|
|
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with
|
|
|
|
* this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
|
2010-12-27 23:04:55 -05:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* @author Mike Gerwitz
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var common = require( './common' ),
|
|
|
|
assert = require( 'assert' ),
|
2011-03-29 23:28:37 -04:00
|
|
|
parse = common.require( 'prop_parser' ).parseKeywords,
|
2010-12-27 23:04:55 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2011-06-08 01:21:07 -04:00
|
|
|
data = parse( 'virtual static abstract foo' ),
|
2011-03-29 23:28:37 -04:00
|
|
|
keywords = data.keywords
|
|
|
|
;
|
2010-12-27 23:04:55 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-29 23:28:37 -04:00
|
|
|
( function testProperlyRetrievesName()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
|
|
data.name,
|
|
|
|
'foo',
|
|
|
|
"Property keyword parser properly retrieves name"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
} )();
|
2010-12-27 23:04:55 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-29 23:28:37 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( function testProperlyRetrievesAllKeywords()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
2011-06-08 01:21:07 -04:00
|
|
|
( ( keywords['virtual'] === true )
|
2011-03-29 23:28:37 -04:00
|
|
|
&& ( keywords['static'] === true )
|
|
|
|
&& ( keywords['abstract'] === true )
|
|
|
|
),
|
|
|
|
"Property keyword parser properly retrieves all keywords"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
} )();
|
2010-12-27 23:04:55 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2011-05-22 22:11:57 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* In an effort to prevent unnecessary bugs, notify the user when they use a
|
|
|
|
* keyword that is not recognized.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
( function testOnlyPermitsKnownKeywords()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert.doesNotThrow( function()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// Odd seeing these all together, isn't it? Note that this is not at all
|
|
|
|
// valid, but the prop parser doesn't care what appears together.
|
2011-06-08 01:21:07 -04:00
|
|
|
parse( 'public protected private static virtual abstract const var' );
|
2011-05-22 22:11:57 -04:00
|
|
|
}, Error, "Known keywords are permitted by the parser" );
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var oddword = 'foobunny',
|
|
|
|
oddname = 'moobunny';
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
try
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// remember, the last part of the string is the var name and is not
|
|
|
|
// considered to be a keyword
|
|
|
|
parse( oddword + ' ' + oddname );
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
catch ( e )
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert.ok( e.message.search( oddword ) !== -1,
|
|
|
|
"Error message contains unrecognized keyword"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.ok( e.message.search( oddname ) !== -1,
|
|
|
|
"Error message contains name"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.fail( "Should not permit unknown keywords" );
|
|
|
|
} )();
|
|
|
|
|