2011-03-13 22:08:08 -04:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* Tests combined file, attempting to emulate a pre-ECMAScript5 environment.
|
|
|
|
* This will ensure fallbacks will work properly on older browsers, such as IE6.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This is /not/ an alternative to running the test suite in the browser of your
|
|
|
|
* choice. It is intended to catch errors early, to ensure bugs are not
|
|
|
|
* committed between browser tests.
|
|
|
|
*
|
2013-12-20 01:11:26 -05:00
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2011, 2013 Mike Gerwitz
|
2011-03-13 22:08:08 -04:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This file is part of ease.js.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* ease.js is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the
|
Relicensed under the GPLv3+
This project was originally LGPLv+-licensed to encourage its use in a community
that is largely copyleft-phobic. After further reflection, that was a mistake,
as adoption is not the important factor here---software freedom is.
When submitting ease.js to the GNU project, it was asked if I would be willing
to relicense it under the GPLv3+; I agreed happily, because there is no reason
why we should provide proprietary software any sort of edge. Indeed, proprietary
JavaScript is a huge problem since it is automatically downloaded on the user's
PC generally without them even knowing, and is a current focus for the FSF. As
such, to remain firm in our stance against proprietary JavaScript, relicensing
made the most sense for GNU.
This is likely to upset current users of ease.js. I am not sure of their
number---I have only seen download counts periodically on npmjs.org---but I know
there are at least a small number. These users are free to continue using the
previous LGPL'd releases, but with the understanding that there will be no
further maintenance (not even bug fixes). If possible, users should use the
GPL-licensed versions and release their software as free software.
Here comes GNU ease.js.
2013-12-20 01:00:35 -05:00
|
|
|
* terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software
|
|
|
|
* Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later
|
|
|
|
* version.
|
2011-03-13 22:08:08 -04:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
|
|
|
|
* ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
|
Relicensed under the GPLv3+
This project was originally LGPLv+-licensed to encourage its use in a community
that is largely copyleft-phobic. After further reflection, that was a mistake,
as adoption is not the important factor here---software freedom is.
When submitting ease.js to the GNU project, it was asked if I would be willing
to relicense it under the GPLv3+; I agreed happily, because there is no reason
why we should provide proprietary software any sort of edge. Indeed, proprietary
JavaScript is a huge problem since it is automatically downloaded on the user's
PC generally without them even knowing, and is a current focus for the FSF. As
such, to remain firm in our stance against proprietary JavaScript, relicensing
made the most sense for GNU.
This is likely to upset current users of ease.js. I am not sure of their
number---I have only seen download counts periodically on npmjs.org---but I know
there are at least a small number. These users are free to continue using the
previous LGPL'd releases, but with the understanding that there will be no
further maintenance (not even bug fixes). If possible, users should use the
GPL-licensed versions and release their software as free software.
Here comes GNU ease.js.
2013-12-20 01:00:35 -05:00
|
|
|
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for
|
|
|
|
* more details.
|
2011-03-13 22:08:08 -04:00
|
|
|
*
|
Relicensed under the GPLv3+
This project was originally LGPLv+-licensed to encourage its use in a community
that is largely copyleft-phobic. After further reflection, that was a mistake,
as adoption is not the important factor here---software freedom is.
When submitting ease.js to the GNU project, it was asked if I would be willing
to relicense it under the GPLv3+; I agreed happily, because there is no reason
why we should provide proprietary software any sort of edge. Indeed, proprietary
JavaScript is a huge problem since it is automatically downloaded on the user's
PC generally without them even knowing, and is a current focus for the FSF. As
such, to remain firm in our stance against proprietary JavaScript, relicensing
made the most sense for GNU.
This is likely to upset current users of ease.js. I am not sure of their
number---I have only seen download counts periodically on npmjs.org---but I know
there are at least a small number. These users are free to continue using the
previous LGPL'd releases, but with the understanding that there will be no
further maintenance (not even bug fixes). If possible, users should use the
GPL-licensed versions and release their software as free software.
Here comes GNU ease.js.
2013-12-20 01:00:35 -05:00
|
|
|
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with
|
|
|
|
* this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
|
2011-03-13 22:08:08 -04:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* @author Mike Gerwitz
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var common = require( './common' ),
|
|
|
|
assert = require( 'assert' ),
|
2011-12-04 12:50:01 -05:00
|
|
|
vm = require( 'vm' ),
|
2011-03-13 22:08:08 -04:00
|
|
|
Class = common.require( 'class' ),
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// sandbox in which combined script will be run
|
2011-12-04 12:50:01 -05:00
|
|
|
sandbox = vm.createContext( {
|
2011-03-13 22:08:08 -04:00
|
|
|
// stub document.write() so we don't blow up
|
|
|
|
document: { write: function() {} },
|
2011-12-04 12:50:01 -05:00
|
|
|
runTests: null,
|
|
|
|
} );
|
2011-03-13 22:08:08 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var file = 'ease-full.js';
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// attempt to read the combined file
|
|
|
|
try
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
var data = require( 'fs' )
|
|
|
|
.readFileSync( ( __dirname + '/../build/' + file ), 'ascii' );
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
catch ( e )
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// if the file doesn't exit, just skip the test
|
|
|
|
console.log(
|
|
|
|
"Combined file not found. Test skipped. Please run `make combined`."
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
process.exit( 0 );
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Let's take this bitch back in time (this is not a complete list, but
|
|
|
|
// satisfies what we need).
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// It is important to note that we prepend this to the script that we'll be
|
|
|
|
// executing, because the script will be executed within a new scope. Any
|
|
|
|
// clobbering we do in our scope will not affect it, nor will any clobbering we
|
|
|
|
// do to it affect us.
|
|
|
|
data = "delete Object.defineProperty;" +
|
|
|
|
"delete Array.prototype.forEach;" +
|
|
|
|
data
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// run the script (if this fails to compile, the generated code is invalid)
|
2011-12-04 12:50:01 -05:00
|
|
|
vm.runInNewContext( data, sandbox );
|
2011-03-13 22:08:08 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// cross your fingers
|
|
|
|
sandbox.easejs.runTests();
|
|
|
|
|