GNU
/
easejs
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity
easejs/package.json.in

42 lines
783 B
JSON
Raw Permalink Normal View History

Basic package.json
2011-03-07 23:08:01 -05:00
{
Began updating package.json - Added additional information, including dev deps, license, test script and 'engines'
2011-05-24 22:30:49 -04:00
"name": "easejs",
Updated package.json to remove deps and correct license Growing much closer to releasing. Hopefully in the next couple of days; I just don't want to rush it. Though, at the same time, I've been noticing projects popping up with very similar / exact names to this one. A project named "ease" was added to the npm repository and another "ease.js" is on GitHub, although it's made no progress. As such, I want to ensure I reserve the name in npm. I've been testing the new library and work and noticed only a couple minor issues, primiarly due to misuse of the library. Looking good.
2011-12-13 21:22:52 -05:00
"description": "A Classical Object-Oriented Framework for JavaScript",
package.json is now generated by configure script and included in distribution
2013-12-22 00:20:21 -05:00
"version": "@VERSION@",
Began updating package.json - Added additional information, including dev deps, license, test script and 'engines'
2011-05-24 22:30:49 -04:00
"author": "Mike Gerwitz <mike@mikegerwitz.com> (http://mikegerwitz.com)",
Updated homepage and git repo URLs
2014-03-20 23:42:53 -04:00
"homepage": "https://www.gnu.org/software/easejs/",
Basic package.json
2011-03-07 23:08:01 -05:00
Began updating package.json - Added additional information, including dev deps, license, test script and 'engines'
2011-05-24 22:30:49 -04:00
"repository": {
"type": "git",
Updated homepage and git repo URLs
2014-03-20 23:42:53 -04:00
"url": "git://git.savannah.gnu.org/easejs.git "
Began updating package.json - Added additional information, including dev deps, license, test script and 'engines'
2011-05-24 22:30:49 -04:00
},
Basic package.json
2011-03-07 23:08:01 -05:00
Began updating package.json - Added additional information, including dev deps, license, test script and 'engines'
2011-05-24 22:30:49 -04:00
"engines": {
"node": ">0.0.0"
},
"dependencies": {},
Updated package.json to remove deps and correct license Growing much closer to releasing. Hopefully in the next couple of days; I just don't want to rush it. Though, at the same time, I've been noticing projects popping up with very similar / exact names to this one. A project named "ease" was added to the npm repository and another "ease.js" is on GitHub, although it's made no progress. As such, I want to ensure I reserve the name in npm. I've been testing the new library and work and noticed only a couple minor issues, primiarly due to misuse of the library. Looking good.
2011-12-13 21:22:52 -05:00
"devDependencies": {},
Began updating package.json - Added additional information, including dev deps, license, test script and 'engines'
2011-05-24 22:30:49 -04:00
"licenses": [
{
Relicensed under the GPLv3+ This project was originally LGPLv+-licensed to encourage its use in a community that is largely copyleft-phobic. After further reflection, that was a mistake, as adoption is not the important factor here---software freedom is. When submitting ease.js to the GNU project, it was asked if I would be willing to relicense it under the GPLv3+; I agreed happily, because there is no reason why we should provide proprietary software any sort of edge. Indeed, proprietary JavaScript is a huge problem since it is automatically downloaded on the user's PC generally without them even knowing, and is a current focus for the FSF. As such, to remain firm in our stance against proprietary JavaScript, relicensing made the most sense for GNU. This is likely to upset current users of ease.js. I am not sure of their number---I have only seen download counts periodically on npmjs.org---but I know there are at least a small number. These users are free to continue using the previous LGPL'd releases, but with the understanding that there will be no further maintenance (not even bug fixes). If possible, users should use the GPL-licensed versions and release their software as free software. Here comes GNU ease.js.
2013-12-20 01:00:35 -05:00
"type": "GPLv3+",
"url": "http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html"
Began updating package.json - Added additional information, including dev deps, license, test script and 'engines'
2011-05-24 22:30:49 -04:00
}
],
"scripts": {
"test": "make test"
},
"tags": [
"object oriented",
"oo",
"oop",
"classes",
"classical",
"interfaces",
"protected members",
"inheritance"
]
Basic package.json
2011-03-07 23:08:01 -05:00
}